User talk:Guivon

Note

Please, all discussion carry on the relevant to the article talk pages--Guivon 01:11, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uncivil edit summary

Here is an example, there are more to be had by just browsing your history. The "demonstrated lack of civilty" you refer to on my talk is yours, not mine. Please try to be collegial in your interactions with other editors. Lar: t/c 23:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting talk pages

Hi, Please, do not delete "Uncivil edit summary" cause it is against the rules.

Regards, Ante Perkovic 12:29, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Guivon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

False accusation - the check user did not confirm that

Decline reason:

CheckUser is not needed to spot a sock. —[[Animum | talk]] 01:17, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.