User talk:Giggy/Archive/March 2008

GA reviews

Hi there,

I've been hanging around the GA noms page for a little, and I want to help with reviewing them. I haven't been at Wikipedia long, so I'm apprehensive about reviewing one myself -- I don't want to make a mistake and cause a problem, really. I was wondering next time you review an article, if I could maybe review it with you so I know exactly what to do? I've noticed you review a lot of them so I'm sure you know what makes (and doesn't make) a GA. If you are interested please let me know :) Thanks -- Galaxy250 (talk) 17:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure, happy to help. Gimme a yell when you're reviewing one and I'll take a look. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 08:40, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll get to reviewing one in the next few days, and I'll let you know! — Galaxy250 (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Sounds like a plan! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 04:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Melee

I think I've addressed all your concerns adequately about the "Reception" section now. If there's anything else, please let me know. Thanks. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 11:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Looking pretty damn good. Tell me when you go to FAC so I can support! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 11:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

The only thing standing in our way now is some tenacious POV-pushing IP. I'll keep you updated. Your help has been great. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 11:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

It's at FAC now. Thanks for the help. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 19:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Planet Relief

Hi there!

I've carried out most of the recommendations you asked for. In relation to the image, it is hard to find one, seeing as the article relates to something which in theory never happened. However, would it be suitable to use an image of one of the people involved in Planet Relief before it was cancelled, such as Ricky Gervais?

Thanks,

ISD (talk) 13:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

That image idea sounds good. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 04:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for passing! Cheers. ISD (talk) 07:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Correction

Ta orthographe en français (sur ta page d'utilisateur) été assez mauvaise—j'ai corrigé. Je suis désolé si qu'il été trop bold. (Actualement, la Wikipédia française utilise n'hésitez pas, mais…). --Kakofonous (talk) 14:49, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Vous etes tres (yes, I forget how to do accents on my keyboard) intelligent! :( - I can spell that normally :P dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 04:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Hilary Duff FAC

Hi there...sentence issues raised by User:indopug have been reworded and addressed. Well u requested for LoCE but i myself am a member of LoCE and had copyedited the article in november 2007 before listing it for GAC which it eventually passed. Some minor rewording has been done by me again after u and indopug pointed out the sentences. Now to address ur queries:

• Early life and career is short because it talks abt her career till she attained the age of 8-9 yrs. Later accomplishments are covered in Television section->Early work. Also her early career features her ballet performance and few TV commercials. Her TV career is chronicled separately so that the article structure is maintained. "..and career" in the section title refers to her performance as a kid in the ballet and TV commercials.
• Content is the "Further reading" section is properly formatted now. If u have any other suggestions then pls suggest.
• Images of her during her acting days are a bit difficult to find but i'll try. But i dont think that lack of acting career image should be an issue for it to being promoted to FA.

Anyways i would appreciate it if u could review the article again and leave a feedback. You can do so at FAC page or my talk page....thanx Gprince007 (talk) 15:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll look at the FAC again. The issue with copyediting is that you need to get some eyes that aren't used to the text to look at it. I could sign up for LOCE and start copyediting my articles, or I could just copyedit them; it's the same thing in that regard. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 04:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Gethin Jones: GA on hold

Hi, thanks for taking the time to review the article. I've made some changes to the article as suggested by you, and have put some comments on the article's talk page. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 20:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

On my way there now. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 04:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Home... already!

Hey Alex. Surprisingly 4 days after the operation, I've been sent home on the grounds that I keep myself healthy and free of pain. Look forward to my next 6-8 weeks of school to recover and I look forward to return to editing shortly. Thanks for your support! — E ^talk 12:47, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

That's surprising but excellent news! Considering the state of your back at the meetup I'm really surprised...enjoy school mate! Take it easy, and have a cookie from me. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 23:58, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter

The March 2008 issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is ready! Dr. Cash (talk) 05:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Giggy got funny mouth

This made me laugh (out loud btw). You're a funny guy. Regarding your last RfA, I said I'd support some time in the future. Just letting you know your efforts around here of late have "earned" my support, whatever that's worth these days :) Until you chose to run again... Cheers. -- Longhair\^talk 11:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

If you want to run, give me a poke and I'll nominate you. Despite this. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 23:44, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

The sooner that stops coming up the better! :) I don't plan to run anytime in the near future anyways. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 00:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

• Strong Oppose, for quitting WP:TSQUAD in favor of the WP:BRC. · AndonicO ^Hail! 02:59, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Next GA newsletter

If you have some ideas on topics to write about, I'd be interested in hearing them (or if you want to write an article, that would be great, too)! The article in this month's issue was literally put together over the weekend, so I haven't really been making plans for articles/topics too far out so far. Dr. Cash (talk) 16:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll probably end up doing DHMO's guide to being an awesome GA reviewer. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 22:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: GA Review

Thanks! I'm sure most of the WP:GM project can't wait for some feedback, the article has really encouraged teamwork recently. ^┌_Joshii^┐_└^chat_┘ 18:36, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Hopefully I'll get it done today. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 22:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

 Done The GM team have hopefully addressed all of your points on Talk:Greater Manchester if you would like to take a look. ^┌_Joshii^┐_└^chat_┘ 17:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

DYK

On March 4, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tim Whitten, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 05:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

FAC Comments

I believe I have addressed your comments at Rise of Nations: T&P's FAC. Hello32020 (talk) 00:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou

I should like to thankyou for {{User:Dihydrogen Monoxide/Wikidrama}}. It sits on my talkpage at User talk:Newbyguesses#Don't go there. Once the /Mantanmoreland arbitration case is over though, I think i might retire it, I don't think I do actually like "drama" at all. Would you be interested in designing a template that said something along the lines of "This user contributes to Fringe theories/ PseudoSciences - ie. Wikipediaspace", if you see what i am getting at. Thanks, again. Newbyguesses - Talk 03:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

How about "This user contributes to articles"? Although, somehow I think that wouldn't be used much :P Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 09:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 4, Issue 10	3 March 2008	About the Signpost

Wales' relationship, breakup with journalist Rachel Marsden raises questions about possible improprieties	Eleven users apply for bureaucratship
Signpost interview: Domas Mituzas	Role of hidden categories under discussion
Book review: Wikipedia: The Missing Manual	Military history WikiProject elections conclude, nine elected
Best of WikiWorld: "Extreme ironing"	News and notes: Encyclopedia of Life, Wikipedian dies, milestones
Dispatches: April Fools mainpage featured article	WikiProject Report: Football
Tutorial: How to use an ImageMap	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

File:David,larry.JPG		My RFA
		Thank you muchly for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth! Kidding btw. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Do those exist? I should say I looked for a pic of a big ice cube, but none I came across were satisfactory. Sad day! Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 12:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Patti Smith

Go for it, I haven't had time to do an in-depth review. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 12:24, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Damageplan

All done, thanks for the review. M3tal H3ad (talk) 01:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

FAC

Thanks for the notice, I would feel bad taking credit for an article that you've worked so hard on, please let me know if there's anything I can do to help fix things. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 03:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Heya!

I noticed your comment here, and, ordinarily, I would have responded inline. However, you requested a talkpage message, so, here I am :P

Anyhow -- I wanted to mention, and, I understand that this isn't exactly a HUGE number (although, I think, for Cobi... or even me :P it would be.)

• Last RfA, he had 307 mainspace edits
• This RfA, he's at 713 mainspace edits

Not a huge increase, but, 400 , or, more than doubled. Not to mention, not everyone's great at articles. I'm not, and, I barely touch them. Folks like Cobi and I, and many many others, contribute in other ways. We make it easier for the article-writers to focus on the articles. In this respect, I firmly believe that this actually makes Cobi very well suited for the toolbox.

I'm also curious, what's changed your opinion since his last 2 RfA's? (You supported both).

Anyhow, I thought I'd drop you a note, per your request :) Have a good one, SQL^{Query me!} 09:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

It's all vandalfighting which is mainly what concerns me, and my attitude has changed somewhat since his last RfA (and, incidentally, since yours). That said, I'm going to strike my oppose because you know I think highly of you, and may move on to supporting at some stage in the week. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 09:42, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Favor?

rofl. Maybe I should take it easy on pants, they do have some uses, apparently. Funny to get a note from you, I was just writing you one (here comes the bad news). I wondered if I could ask you a favor. You've written a ton of GA's, could you look at concussion and tell me what you think needs to be done to get it up to GA? I was thinking of putting it up. If it's a long way away, that's useful information too. Hate to bug you but I could really use the help. Thanks much. Peace, delldot talk 10:08, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Ironically, I was just looking at it (OK, this is weird). I need to run now, but at a glance it seemed good; be bold and nominate it! I'll try and review it (cough this isn't canvassing for a GA review cough!) in the next few days. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 10:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Spooky! Yeah, I dunno if it's good enough yet, e.g. the prose lists under Concussion#Signs and symptoms. But I really didn't know, which is why I wanted to hear your opinion. I don't want to jump ahead in line and ask you for an actual review, but it's very nice of you to kind of offer XD Thanks a ton. delldot talk 10:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh well, I ended up reading and starting a review. It'll take me a while though, so tell me when it's at GAN. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 23:17, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Will do, thanks much. delldot talk 05:27, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, I went ahead and nominated it. I haven't found a replacement image for the boxing one yet, but other than that I think I've addressed (or explained why I failed to address) everything else you brought up so far. Thanks again for all the help, I sure appreciate it. Peace, delldot talk 10:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

A small correction

Hi Alex, I noticed your comment "A fi de acord cu Husond" in RfA just wanted to drop a line that it sounds better if you say "Sunt de acord cu Husond", infinitive is almost never used in Romanian. How you wrote would translate to "to be of accord with Husond" which doesn't sound good in English either. Sorry, I don't mean to go about correcting people, my English needs lots of revision too, but I saw that and I thought is funny that you wrote in Romanian and I just wanted to say "hi" and be useful at the same time. -- AdrianTM (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, and "Ni hao" (no, sorry that's as much as I speak too) -- AdrianTM (talk) 05:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey Adrian, thanks for that. As you can see my Romanian writing is horrible - I actually got that text off an internet translation. Oh the shame! From now on I'll stick to witty commentary in English. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 05:10, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

No, mate, don't be afraid, the verb "to be" is the most irregular verb in most of the languages (at least Indo-European ones), if you use computer translation you can learn stuff, but this kind of things are inevitable. -- AdrianTM (talk) 05:42, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

You're telling me! Learning French at the moment, and etre (minus the accents my keyboard can't afford) is killing me! Anyway, I fixed it up per your suggestion. Merci, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 07:23, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

De rien. -- AdrianTM (talk) 07:25, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Fixes

No problem, nitpicking is my pride and joy. I was quite entertained reading your "battle plan". Keep up the good work with the reviews, we'll be naming you president of GAN soon! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 09:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh lord, I resent that title! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 09:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Re Mr. Stain

the official site used for ref 9 and 10 is a flash module embedded in the web page and so there is no url pointing to the section named characters it has to be clicked-on after the flash module loads. Could you please leave a response on the articles talk page. Thank you for your review, Binarymoron (talk) 14:22, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, I'll take a look and leave some more commentary. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 23:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments I have taken care of all the issues you listed. I am working on expanding the reception section as you suggested. Also is there anything else I should change or improve. Thanks again, Binarymoron (talk) 13:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

re: Fanning

I struck some of my comments and replied to a few more. You are doing great work on these articles (I have read some of your other Powderfinger material) so I hope you keep it up. --Laser brain (talk) 14:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for that, and the compliment - I'll take a look at your comments. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 23:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

My RfB

I wanted to personally thank you, DHMO (or H20 or Agua, or my favorite, Hydrogen Hydroxide), for your participation in my recent RfB. I have heard the community's voice that they require more of a presence at RfA's of prospective bureaucrats, and I will do my best over the near future to demonstrate such a presence and allow the community to see my philosophy and practices in action. I am thankful and appreciative that in general, the community feels that I am worthy of the trust it requires of its bureaucrats, and I hope to continue to behave in a way that maintains your trust in me and my actions. I hope that over the near future, you will become comfortable and satisfied with my understanding of the particulars and subtleties inherent in the RfA process, and that I may be able to count on your support when I decide to once again undergo an RfB. If you have any suggestions, comments, or constructive criticisms, please let me know via talkpage or e-mail. Thank you again. -- Avi (talk) 17:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Maybe next time. :) Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 23:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

FAC reviews

I am hoping you will review the February FAC stats here and this FAC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

I've withdrawn the support, thanks for the heads up. I'll try to be more careful in future. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 23:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding; casual supports can really contribute to a backlog at FAC, and divert good reviewers efforts to articles that might not be ready. It's unfortunate that I have to close out fine articles due to lack of review, while reviewers are working on cleaning up articles that don't yet have the basics (like reliable sources) in place. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks in turn for understanding, and for all your work around FAC. I know I couldn't do it; and I'm sure many share that opinion. You rock. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 00:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Super Smash Bros. Melee is also going to need some help to pull through; since you supported, hopefully you can help iron out the remaining issues. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll do my best (after I'm done with my FACs!). dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 00:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Another source of concern is at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Defense of the Ancients (and there are others); a disproportionate amount of reviewer time (from only a few reviewers, who are stretched thin) is being spent on trying to pull these articles up to standard after others declare support. I hope you can help out soon; resources should be allocated across all articles, but reviewers are forced to concentrate on articles that are appearing at FAC in need of peer review, copyedit and reliable sources, risking neglect of other worthy articles. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmm...I copyedited that one once, as noted in my support, but I'll give it another run through. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 01:09, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding; I hope you can see the strain these premature supports put on FAC (in terms of backlog) and other reviewers, who then have to dig in to address the issues. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Made in the Dark

I've finished taking care of the points on your review. Is there anything else you can see that needs fixing? Thanks for the review btw :) Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 00:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll take a look in a moment. Just taking a blind stab; did you work on the issues of too much quoting and not enough prose? If yeah, that it should probably good...just gimme a moment to finish up with my FAC stuff and I'll be on my way. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 00:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I did my best to minimise it. Take as long as you need :). Seraphim♥ ^Whipp 00:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Yay! I really needed the outside input as I was stuck. Thanks for the thorough review! :0). 01:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Seraphim Whipp (talk • contribs)

re: Super Smash Bros

Thanks for the note. I have stricken some of my comments about reliable source issues since the consensus seems to be that IGN is a reliable source. My request for a neutral copyedit stands. Ashnard expressed some frustration at finding an uninvolved copyeditor - is there someone at the video games project that might do it? --Laser brain (talk) 04:01, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

By the way, I'd like to say thank you for continuing to work at this FAC. One thing, since RockMFR hasn't responded to your question about the image, can't we just be bold and replace the image with the new one? Thanks. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 14:38, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Scott5114 2

Hey DHMO, just a courtesy note that I've left a reply to your opposition at the above RfA. All the best, AGK (contact) 12:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

London Calling GA

I have done everything you have suggested. If you search The Clash through the RIAA website the London Calling certifications do appear. It's strange that they don't on the link you posted. -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 19:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Gundagai is new ACOTF

You voted for Gundagai, New South Wales for Australian collaboration of the fortnight. It has been selected, so you might like to help to improve the article. Thanks. --Scott Davis ^Talk 09:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou for the barnstar! At least I managed to change the ACOTF at about the right time this week! The previous few had been rather late. --Scott Davis ^Talk 09:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Extreme speed

Nothing gets past me when I'm in the right wiki-mood :) -- Longhair\^talk 11:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I was watching the new user creation log for a vandal that was irking me earlier. That's all... then I spotted the obvious violation, and zapped accordingly. It's not one of your own accounts for another purpose is it? I can unblock... -- Longhair\^talk 11:26, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Right place, right time, that's where the speed came from. Nothing more. No bots, only fingers here. -- Longhair\^talk 11:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Ready for action?

How about a small request for admin for DHMO? Let me know. I'm thinking you're more than ready now for a new nomination, so if you're interested in accepting, I'll make the particulars towards nominating you. --rm 'w avu 11:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Not until after you run for it. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 11:42, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Seriously? I got nailed to the ground last time. I'm not looking to a demoralising defeat again. Too embarrassing. You've at least got a lot more development behind you in the last little while, while I've not spent nearly as much time online with work changes, house changes (almost finished on that one) and lifestyle changes (re wife and son - still got ages on that one, though). If you think I should then nominate me nd if your reasoning is valid and strong enough, then I'll accept, but I don't know how my chances will fare. --rm 'w avu 11:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not going for a while in any case. Gimme a bit to think about it for you. We'll see. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 11:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

A noob's guide to GA reviewing

Hey, your essay's interesting. I plan on reviewing some GA noms once the article I nominated is reviewed (whether it gets accepted or not, at least I'll be familiar with the process!). Had a question about something in your essay though - footnote 8 refers to a Veropedia parser. What's that and where is it? Thanks. :) Somno (talk) 12:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm in a hurry, but check out Veropedia. Register on the site, and it should be in your userlinks at the top. If you can't work it out (I couldn't for a while either), bug Riana, and tell her I say hi. :) Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 12:36, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I went to the site before but didn't know I had to register to see the parser thingy. Thanks! :) Somno (talk) 12:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

No probs; I'll try and take a look at your GAN soon. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 23:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

No hurry, there are plenty of noms that have been there longer than mine (and it's moving a lot faster than WP:RFF, which isn't moving at all). Somno (talk) 00:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Do you consider this a reliable source? [1] It's not ideal, but it may be the best available for info about the design process. Thanks. Somno (talk) 03:11, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

That should be fine. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: DotA FAC

Thanks for the heads-up. Sorry you don't like the game, though- and Warcraft III in general. :P Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 14:28, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Bernard FAnning

Bad joke, couldn't resist. Nice job on that one! --Kakofonous (talk) 04:15, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

You forgot about OMGdyssey Number Five. And in retrospect, I can see why you would...! Thanks :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 04:21, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

My request for bureaucratship

Dear Giggy, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats.
I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight.
I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community.
I was a little miserable after the results came out, so I'm going to spread the love via dancing hippos. As you do. :)
I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana ⁂ 04:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

H-twenty?

Hello, DHMO! I was curious how you selected your signature text. As I’m sure you know, the chemical formula for water is H₂O (with the letter “O” representing oxygen), not H₂0 (with a zero). Did you substitute the numeral for the element deliberately? — Knowledge Seeker দ 06:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I assure you that it's all an elaborate typo! Time to fix it. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂0) 06:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I’m glad I spoke up then. I’m a chemistry major and a typography nerd, so I tend to have an eye for these things. — Knowledge Seeker দ 07:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Very much appreciated :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

GA reviewing

Hi DM, do you fact check when you review articles in GAN? --Efe (talk) 07:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I try to. Why - did I miss something major? dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

No. You asked me before to review articles in GAN but I was a bit hesitant to pick one to fully review it because of this "fack checking" issues. Though it is not required to fact check (can be traced from older discussions in GAN), I have this feeling that I need to do so. But I have no time, and you know, we have no internet connection in the house. Thats partly why I missed to do your request. Maybe someday I can help reduce the backlog. For now, song-related articles improvement. =) --Efe (talk) 07:50, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I see your point. I sometimes will click the link if I find the claim being made suspicious, but I generally just hover the mouse over and glance at the publisher - if they're an RS then I'll take my chance. Yeah, it's not the best ethic, but I haven't blown the Wiki up yet ( AGF and all). dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:52, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Haha. I thought Bernard Fanning already got the little star. Anyway, I partly read your user page and its entertaining. --Efe (talk) 08:02, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Rawlins

Prove that Rawlins has not written an autobiography. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.223.218 (talk) 10:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The burden of proof is on you to prove that he is "known for his vanity page", using a reliable source. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The biography consists almost entirely of quotations from Rawlins' own site, www.dioi.org. The rest is mostly from Pickering, a friend of Rawlins. Even a small amount of Pickering's own scientific work is praised. Wikipedia rules ban links to a site connected to yourself. Rawlins used numerical sock-puppets, to hide the fact that he was writing a banned autobigraphy. They are registered to an American uni but used by Dennis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.223.218 (talk) 10:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm not interested in this sockpuppetry stuff, but if the content I revered is backed up by RS, feel free to add it back in. Citing ones' self is not an RS. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

The "revered" seems to be a mistake for "reversed". Rawlins' citing his own web-site, i.e. himself, is certainly not a reliable source. It is not wise to get near Rawlins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.226.135 (talk) 11:22, 10 March 2008 (UTC) Dennis Rawlins' vanity page has been drastically edited by an administrator. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.41.51.240 (talk) 10:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

London Calling summary

Hi DM, (if you rated the article) please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. Thanks. –pjoef (talk • contribs) 12:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, I'd have thought my GA review would do what you want to see done on the Comments page. Feel free to add other stuff if you disagree. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Red Hot Chili Peppers

How is the information not notable? Allmusicguide, Q, Rolling Stone, VH1 and MTV all find it notable to mention in their biographies of the band. Why would not even two lines be notable on wikipedia? It's definitely sourced factual information. It's also comparable to stage antics by other bands which have no trouble being considered notable. An example is Iggy Pop's stage antics while he was part of the Stooges and Bobby Brown's stage antics. Munci (talk) 12:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, I should have used a better edit summary. I'll fix my edit up now. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Userpage

I saw your multilingual stuff. For Chinese, it's Ni hao, wo shi/jiao (doesn't really matter) Alex... I assume you want to say 'and I speak a little Chinese?' Well, it's Ni hao, wo shi/jiao Alex he wo hui shuo yi dian dian zhongwen - Hello, my name is Alex and I can speak a little Chinese. You probably won't need it anyway :) Littleteddy (roar!) 13:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd rather not say the second phrase; I don't think I can speak that much! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2008-02-22 Singapore Airlines

Perhaps you may have misunderstood, but I do recognise the importance of concensus building, adherence to concensus, and the good things the MedCab can do. But there was a reason why I chose not to "adhere to concensus" with regards to this case, why I decided not to participate in the first MedCab, and why I disregarded "concensus" in the second, all of which I will explain in fuller detail if given the right opportunity. Ultimately, I will participate in the case, as long as all individuals participate with an open mind and with full demonstration that no ill-will is involved. That "other parties are willing to abide by consensus if I will do so" is actually a moot point as far as I am concerned, for the said "other parties" is the very same group who has insisted that I, the minority, should abide by their "concensus" all these while, which they will obviously reprise and enforce during the MedCabm irregardless of circumstances and whatever I may say during the MedCab process. Have they demonstrated any willingness to listen to my case again without bias, and without bringing in personal agendas?--Huaiwei (talk) 15:04, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Let's put this in very simple terms. There is a possibility that at the end of the MedCab, the mediator, User:Dihydrogen Monoxide will issue a statement of consensus that decides against you... or in your favor. I'd like to underline here that what this statement says is up to the neutral third party mediator, not anybody else (or do you have credible reason to doubt H2O's neutrality?), so any closed minds, ill-will and anything else you'd care to allege for other participants is irrelevant.

Now, Russavia, Vegaswikian and I have stated that we will abide by this statement, meaning that we'll observe the consensus even if we disagree with it. The million dollar question is: will you?

Jpatokal, we all know full well why you are particularly energised by this particular exercise. Unfortunately, the Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal, for your information, does not "impose sanctions or make judgments". As the mediator, Dihydrogen Monoxide is not expected to "issue a statement of consensus" of any form. He merely facilitates "communication and help parties reach an agreement by their own efforts". This agreement is forged by us, not him. Do you, in all honesty, feel that you are approaching this dispute-resolution mechanism with a genuine desire to seek such an agreement, or are you here merely because a particular involved member pisses you off personally in other articles? And speaking of which, since when did you become an involved party in this particular case?--Huaiwei (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm involved because I use the Changi article probably more than any other on Wikipedia, I care deeply about its quality, and I'm pissed off not by you personally — I neither know you nor care — but by the endless edit warring between you and Russavia and the way it's affecting this article and many others. Jpatokal (talk) 03:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree, I will not be making any statements of consensus; all I want to do is try and help you guys agree on one. I can make proposals, see if we agree/disagree, and go from there. Can we go from there, with an open mind and no ill-will towards anyone? dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

I am personally prepared to put aside past grievences and approach this MedCab with a reasonable level of goodwill and common sense. I hope I have some company in this respect.--Huaiwei (talk) 22:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Free as a Bird

Think it's all been done.--andreasegde (talk) 19:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Will take a look. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Martin O'Donnell GAN

Thanks for the review, I think I've addressed your concerns. Cheers, Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 21:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Will take a look. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Process

What's up with [2] & [3]?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 00:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I know for sure that a bot updates the template, and I thought it does the recent list too. Am I wrong? dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 00:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

The bearded(less) one

Congratulations are in order for this. Glad I could be of some help here. 51 more articles to (G|F)A and you could get a new category "Featured Project" ! - Peripitus (Talk) 01:42, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

If we could get Bernie featured, all them borderline notability singles should be a piece of cake! Better yet, I should get WP:MUSIC changed to prevent articles on singles. Band members done and we're home! Thanks for your help! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiPeanut for you

Well, er, how 'bout we split it? delldot talk 05:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Teehee :) Thanks! Nice work on Concussion too. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:38, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I owe you for dragging me kicking and screaming to GAN. I probably would have dicked around on it for another 2 months otherwise XD By the way, if you do have any comments about how to improve it left over from the review you were going to do, I'd still be psyched to hear them. 'Course I realize there's more pressing work to be done. Peace, delldot talk 06:52, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll try and get around there at some stage. If you want to for PR, I'll watchlist it, so I feel guilty enough to actually comment. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

It's actually recently had a PR, so I'd feel bad adding more to the PR backlog. Though if you know any head trauma experts, input from them would pretty much rule, since it hasn't been reviewed by an expert (hey, a girl can hope). I was more just saying if you still have any thoughts kicking around from when you were reviewing before, spit 'em out. Peace, delldot talk 10:08, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

About SSBM

Hey DHMO. I've heard that you were planning on giving this article a copyedit to satisfy Laser Brains's concern that it needed a copyedit. I just wanted to know whether you're still planning on doing this. Of course, I don't mind if you're too busy, I just need to know what's going on with the FAC. Thanks. Nice work on your FAs, by the way. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 07:22, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

OK, I promise to try and do it within the next few days...I really don't know how much spare time I'll have, but I'll try. Really sorry if you were counting on it. :s dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem. I hate to sound as if I'm rushing you or anything. Thanks. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 07:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

*Ashnard feels obligated to give "huggles", even though he doesn't know what they are* Damn Australian slang. You're the best DHMO! Anywho, I'm off to school. Bye!!!! Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 07:41, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

You need to get on IRC some time. Although, in retrospect, I'm not sure if that was the best idea. :D dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:43, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

IRC hey...Maud hey... But seriously, thanks for that. Much appreciated. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 16:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Always welcome! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Nom

Plenty of noms to go around - pile it on when the time comes! heh Wisdom89 _{(T / ^C)} 07:37, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Your userpage

It's excellent! I like it. :) Acalamari 16:33, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Aww, no fair, you didn't edit it! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Category:Rouge non-admins

Oh.... its still funny even with me gone....... I am tempted to add myself back. :) Tiptoety ^talk 23:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Careful, you could get blocked by one of them if you add yourself. ;) Congrats, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

LOL!! I should create a user box that states: "This user is a rouge non-admin" then post on AN/I a couple of times, it will eventually result in a checkuser. Lol, I hope i did not ruin the joke.. Tiptoety ^talk 23:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Ruin the joke? Posting at ANI makes everything funnier. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

No, no... i meant ruin Category:Rouge non-admins, your userpage said it is no longer funny casue of one of the members passing a RfA.... :) Tiptoety ^talk 23:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, well, there's a solution for that too ;) Don't worry, you didn't ruin the joke, I just like having a userpage with no cats. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 00:02, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

This cracks me up...

...even though it really shouldn't. Enigma ^msg! 06:46, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

*audible groan* dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

And damn, I see I tipped you off to the comment on his talk page. I actually used Interiot's tool to get the exact number and when I tried to save the page, you had beaten me! Curses! Enigma ^msg! 06:52, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Kick-arse barnstar from a kick-arse editor

...I'm honoured. Seriously. Thanks you. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 07:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

kick-arse shocked face! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:36, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I always thought my user page looked a little bare without an award. Best not waste time, eh?.;) Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 07:43, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

You could always given yourself the best userpage award...;) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/BBC Young Musician of the Year

There is a question for you their regarding your comment on merging all the individual finalist lists in to one. Qst (talk) 08:10, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Medieval household GA review

Thanks for your review of my article on the medieval household. Sorry I took so long to respond, please see the talk page. Lampman ^{Talk to me!} 13:17, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick response, and your pass! I've listed the article on the GA page, under History (Europe). Did you update the count, or should I do that? Lampman ^{Talk to me!} 14:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

A bot updates the GA number template, but you should update the section count if you've changed the section. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 14:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Gmail group

I've had the worst time trying to get Gmail chat working.. every time I log in it logs me out right away and tells me I have to log into Gmail to use chat. Even though I'm already logged in. I have no chat mojo. --Laser brain (talk) 14:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

:( Have you tried downloading Google Talk? dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Machine Head (band)

All taken care of. Thanks for the review. —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 20:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Passing. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:13, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Done with Down also. I don't have access to flickr so I can't get images. —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 19:03, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll try and get you some pics for various articles one of these days. Put a list somewhere :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. M3tal H3ad got one for Machine Head. I think Down and Black Tide are the only ones that need pictures. —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 22:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

I saw nothing for Down at a glance, not sure about the other yet. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Chances of passing an RfA

Hello H₂O.
I am hoping you can give me some advice.
I was nominated for an RfA two weeks ago. I failed on the grounds that I had too little experience in non-vandalfighting areas.
Since then, I have not really changed my editing patterns. However, I have done a lot of vandal fighting since then.
This is a fairly hard-to-read text version of my wannabe kate summary at the start of my failed RfA
Here is my wannabe kate summary now.
Someone asked me today if they could nominate me for admin. I told them I would have to ask some experienced users what they thought about me trying again so soon after failing an RfA.
Based on what I have done in the interval, do you think there is any chance that I would pass an RfA? J.delanoy^gabs_adds 16:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

In short, no, you won't pass. For a start, make Panasonic DMP-BD30K better. I saw your comment re. me in your last RfA (sorry about my mistake on that other article), but the reception section isn't the only problem. There are random linebreaks, badly formatted references, no images, and a stack of listcruft. Show that you know MOS and care improving and developing more than one article and you'll have a better chance of getting my support. Sorry if this seems blunt, but as you've come for honest advice, it's best, IMO, if I give you my honest opinion. Hope you don't mind :) Give it a few months, branch out into other areas, develop more articles, and I'd be happy to give more advice in the future. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

No offense taken. I do have a few questions. Do you have any suggestions about how to eliminate the listcruft in Panasonic DMP-BD30K? As I said in my RfA, I patterned the article around another (rather poorly written, apparently) article (Panasonic DMP-BD10) about an almost identical product. I have no ideas of how to properly integrate the mundane info into coherent text. Also, I am not sure what you mean by random line breaks. It looks fine on my 1280x800px screen, and when I changed my screen resolution to the other available sizes, (800x600, 1024x768, 1280x768. I have a notebook) it still looks OK to me. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 14:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikimania 2009

We're quite late as-is (obviously). I may publish in as little as an hour, so if you can do it, please feel free, but I will publish without it if it's not ready when I am. You can start with what I have at User:Ral315/News and notes. Ral315 (talk) 07:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Looking for help

Hi water =), i had posted an entry in mediation cabal and you promptly answer. I am sorry my english is not fairly good so i want to try my best to communicate with you.

Basically i had updated the section which i was working on few minutes ago (adding details of my request and so on). I am not sure what would happen next but i hope my problem can be solved. Thanks --HappyApple (talk) 10:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll take a look now, thanks for the note. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

By the way, i really feel some frigthened as he could convince his friends or , i dont know , he may use his power to block or ban me (in spanish wikipedia, that's for sure) after the mediation cabal request i posted here. --HappyApple (talk) 10:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

I very much doubt that will happen. I recall working with Dodo in the past and not seeing any such issues with him. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, i dont know if is rather illegal, or is it allowed?. But Am i able to have two different accounts in two different Wikipedias?. i.e. i am known as HappyApple here, and CleverChemist in spanish wikipedia (i am not sure if this is legal?).

By the way, i had recently check my discussion page on spanish wikipedia and Dodo has said that i am defamating him because i had posted my request for mediation. And he also has said that my attitude is resulting rather destructive. Do you agree?. per see A la vuelta.

You know i really want to say thanks for your advise and guidance on this. But since Dodo's attitude, shown to me today i really frowned down to assume good faith. However i want to remark i am polite and i wish this situation can be solved. Like i explained myself in the mediation cabal request, Dodo, has blocked a friend account and he has since behaving like a bully. --HappyApple (talk) 10:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi again. I hope to do not being unpolite or annoying with my request. But as i suggested in my previous message. It just happened. Dodo's friend. Petronas has blocked me for about three days. [4] --HappyApple (talk) 11:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC) Pd. i know this would happened, i rather would say he is very angry because of my request.

Maaaate

Re User:Moondyne/AU categories. Was Giggabot still going to tackle steps 2 and 3 of the cats tagging part? Blnguyen is ready to kick off the article tagging using Satyrbot. —Moondyne click! 11:30, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[5] Replaced? As I understand it, Satyrbot is only going to do that article talk page tagging, not the category talk page tagging. —Moondyne click! 06:44, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Aah...well, it's welcome to do both. Encouraged, even. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Air China Review

Some parts of the article not well written, eg Subsidiaries. Destination list have no source, and source provided have no access date. Please improvise, i will do a second review once the article is well written. Jannisri (talk) 12:06, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

You accidentally deleted references

I noticed that you changed the Australian Idol 2007 page, to tidy it up a bit, but in doing so you accidentally wiped 6 references, and then put a note at the top to remind people to add in references! I have added the 6 references back in to the page, and added in some more useful information. I thought that it was a bit biased to simply stated that "in reaction to Mark Holden's encouragement, Tarisai Vushe lashed out", because in actual fact she lashed out in reaction to Mark Holden telling her live on air that she was fake. I am sure that the YouTube videos of the shows themselves provide sufficient evidence to back up all of the claims. Also, it wasn't just Ben McKenzie who was affected by the Hillsong Church allegation. As at the time that the allegation was made, the favourites were 1. Tarisai 2. Matt 3. Ben McKenzie 4. Daniel 5. Marty with Carl and Natalie favourites to be eliminated. The Hillsong Church claim had the effect of reversing the voting, such that they finished in roughly the opposite order, and it is very important to note that. They didn't just fall randomly either. 7th, 6th and 5th were all named by Hillsong.

Anyway, if you think that there is some problem with showing video footage of the show itself, and quoting its content, then please feel free to make the necessary amendments. Dyinghappy (talk) 15:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Articlehistory on GA passes

Hi, Dihydrogen, I spend far too much of my time cleaning up GA passes, wanted to let you know for future reference. Please see the instructions at Template:Articlehistory. When the ah is installed incorrectly, it causes extra work for me and for GimmeBot (it stalls the bot, and he has to make two passes). When there is a previous peer review, it is the first event in articlehistory, so building GA as the first event stalls the bot. I've reverted the incorrect template, replaced it instead with the GA templates, and when GimmeBot goes through, he will get it right. If you don't build the ah correctly, it's best to use the old GA templates and let GimmeBot do it correctly.[6] Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:13, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Eek...one of the few cases where I forgot to put the PR in. I need to be more careful. :( dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:11, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Heya mate, the review's going to be 24 hours late, but I promise it will come on Saturday :) By the way, can you please upload a new version of Image:1947 Baro Map.JPG on Commons, please - it's still PD-Aus, just a cropped version. Ta, Daniel (talk) 04:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Done. Looking forward to review. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:26, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The E=mc² Barnstar
		Math is teh suck, and you rocked that shit!!! Jmlk17 06:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

...omg. Thanks. That's the motivation I need to go study some more! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for your welcoming message. --SadPuppy (talk) 09:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Promotion, PR etc

Yeah. I think I was more nervous about getting it right than I was actually getting elected...! Anyway, I'll see if I can get to your peer review this afternoon, as you may have judged from my talk page, I've got quite a lot on at the moment! Cheers for now, I'll let you know as soon as I've done something about it! The Rambling Man (talk) 09:22, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Look forward to it! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Rene And Georgette Magritte With Their Dog After The War

Thanks for complimenting my "Rene And Georgette Magritte With Their Dog After The War" DYK. I am wondering why you think the link to the audio clip should have been removed? Thanks and best wishes, House of Scandal (talk) 12:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

• I reverted the edit for now while I am waiting for more information. Don't worry, this is no brewing edit war! Thanks for your interest in the article. Best wishes, House of Scandal (talk) 13:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  • As far as I'm aware, we're only allowed to link to audio material hosted onwiki. See Wikimedia:Media help (I forget where the page focused on editors is, but if you look at some articles with audio samples you could work it out...). The AMG link is copyvio-ish. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Grim Fandango runthrough

When you get a chance, could you look through the Grim Fandango article? I've got all the references all fixed up at this point. --MASEM 13:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Will do. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank-you

I can has mop?

Hi Dihydrogen Monoxide! Thank-you for your support in my RfA (91/1/1). I take all the comments to heart and hope I can fulfil the role of being an admin to the high standard that the community deserves. Seraphim♥ Whipp 17:10, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

You can has mop! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Jumbo Carnation

No offense, but I have reverted your inclusion of Jumbo Carnation on the list of Marvel Comics Mutants under "J", since he was already listed under "C". Rosencomet (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Oops, my bad. Hope the article wasn't restored, as per the AfD. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Template:Db-redirtypo2

Problem should be fixed. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Looks good. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Slayer discography

Hey, would you mind commenting on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Slayer discography? Pass or fail I want it closed. Thanks, —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 02:12, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

re:RFA 2

Thanks friend, but I said I'd wait six months and I'm sticking to it :) It'll be here soon enough. VanTucky 02:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

:( dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Kenwyne Jones

I copyedited this article today, and all of my concerns about punctuation errors have been resolved. If you want to perform a GA review, please feel free to do so. I don't want to come out of this bearing ill will toward anyone, but I did feel attacked yesterday. I have been working to try to cut down on the GA nomination backlog, and I applied the criteria as I understood them. I am apparently the only editor who didn't know not to take the stability criteria literally, but I am glad to see that the criteria have been rewritten. I just felt that, instead of other editors appreciating my effort, they spat in my face for making an honest mistake. I'm sure that I'm taking that too personally, though, so I wanted to let you know that I have moved on. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm a bit too involved (IMO) to do a review, but thanks for the comment. I appreciate your sincerity. You have been doing good work, sometimes people just don't notice this when you make a mistake. I apologise for doing so. The stability criteria has been changed to what actually happens, which is good - again, I'm sorry that I (we?) attacked you for going by the letter of a guideline when you were't aware of the spirit. Thanks for your help; I do hope to see you around GAN again, if you can find it within you to forgive me (us?). Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

To be honest, you probably didn't attack me. I think I just need to take a few days away from Wikipedia to clear my head (not just about this situation, but just in general). Fortunately, I leave for vacation tomorrow morning, so I am forced to do just that. I apologize for my unwillingness to listen to feedback. I was caught off-guard and was too defensive to give an appropriate reply, which just snowballed from there. I am very glad to see that the stability guideline is changed so that this can be avoided in the future--perhaps it was good for this to happen because it prompted that change. Thanks for your understanding, and perhaps I will get back to reviewing articles once I get home. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Enjoy your holiday :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Reponse to mediation and end to dispute

Hi, i contacted you at first hand so i could show my case regarding to spanish wikipedia. But since arguments and counter arguments have been shown. I have decided to walk away from any further dispute. And on the following statement i want to make things clear, before closing my case.

First of all I asked Kim Brunning's assistance with that.

And in response to Dodo's arguments in his commons page, i must add, that i had publicly declared apologies to him for the incident and i stated that it is my wish this will never happen again. [7]

And as for the Wikimeet up incident, i have to declare that my words were already deleted and such issue has been closed.

As of March 15. The page has been cleared and updated and no any sign of endorsing nor following previous comments i had made have shown up [8].

I am sorry if i sounded a little bit paranoic in my first post, but i didn't know what to do. (I even asked for help as it could be seen from here [9] (Of course that can't be taken as an excuse but certainly it is my wish to settle down this dispute and make it finished or let case closed).

i also want to state: i had made many mistakes over the process (during and after the incidents) i admit i should have remained calm. so i want to address apologies to all parts involved and declare that i will never state any arguments against anyone, like the way i did.

Dodo and petronas have left Spanish wikipedia, but i am sure this was motivated not by me, but by other users involved (personal affairs or disputes) on that as you can see here [10]. So i wish this could be set on the record.

I know you had expressed to Dodo on his user's page that you will not buy my story [11]. it is ok, i admit i had been paranoic. but not anymore.

This time, i had being neutral with myself, and i am showing to you evidence based on records and edits made by other users.

So i wish as part of cabal mediation, you could give me a chance (as i had no other previous incident made, except the showed on cabal mediation during these days) (assuming good faith) and let the case closed on mediation cabal discussion. Thank you for your patience, --HappyApple (talk) 07:16, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure, I'm happy to let it go. Good luck, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Off topic

Hi, hmm.. I could tell for your user name, that you choosed a fancy name for water. Do you like chemistry?. As a symbol of goodwill and goodfaith (from me), do you wish to join our project?. Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry--HappyApple (talk) 07:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I detest chemistry, but I do like hoaxes! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:46, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Yikes, i didn't know there was a big deal with the hoax you mentioned. (even for someone who is trying to become a chemist like me, your link made me felt surprised, (i should be ashamed about that :D). Well, i will take a inside reading to the article, it seems very interesting.

I was reading your user's page, and you say you are from Australia. Did you had the opportunity to watch Beyond 2000 on Seven or Ten (networks)?, that was a great show. it is a pitty that it is off the air at the moment. Do you know where i can obtain more information about it? (except wikipedia, as i see the article giving not enough information). Thanks. Peace =) --HappyApple (talk) 07:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I heard of the show, but never watched it. Most recently, it was named Beyond Tomorrow, I think. You might like this - found it with a google search. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Abbey Mills Mosque

Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I have implemented many of your suggestions and responded to each of your points on the talk page. Thanks again! -- Avi (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Will take a look. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your time, patience and suggestions! -- Avi (talk) 03:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

I've Requested A Peer Review

I've requested a peer review of Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver following an intense clean-up and restructuring of the article. Any feedback you can provide would be appreciated. The Clawed One (talk) 23:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Peer review idea

Hi, I have made a proposal that no peer review request be archived without some response. To aid in this, there is a new list of PR requests at least one week old that have had no repsonses beyond a semi-automated peer review. This list is at Wikipedia:Peer review/backlog.

There are just over 100 names on the PR volunteers page, so I figure if each of these volunteers reviewed just one or two PR requests without a response from the list each month, it would easily take care of the "no response" backlog (as there have been 2 or 3 such unanswered requests a day on average).

If you would be able to help out with a review or two a month from the "no responses" backlog list that would be great (and much appreciated). Please discuss questions, comments, or ideas at the PR talk page and thanks in advance for your help, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 00:03, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

BoL

As a contributor to the first discussion, your input at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Removing topic ban on Blow of Light would be much appreciated. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 03:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the expression of support DH :) See my reply to Espresso. Gatoclass (talk) 04:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

You Tube footage of the show itself isn't considered to be reliable?

I am confused and surprised by this suggestion. Surely if it is a YouTube clip of the show itself, which proves quite clearly that it is of the show, and the show is being quoted, then it counts as a reliable reference. Why doesn't it? Dyinghappy (talk) 12:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Boredoms GA stuff

Hi, I've made most of the changes you recommended (here are some notes):

• I have added some more sources and a lot of ref tags; I hope the use of ref tags isn't excessive.
• Yes, that one band is called UFO or Die.
• I've moved the "Some people disputed these claims" sentence and rewrote it because apparently it's supported by the Vice article.
• For access dates as refs, I either pulled them from the page history or just put today, since all the sites are still up as of today.

Thanks for the review. = ∫_t^c 5th Eye 18:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: ONM

Sure. By the way, you have checked to ensure that info relating to AoE is there, haven't you? Let me know which issues you need and then I'll e-mail the info relating to AoE to you. Thanks. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 18:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

From what I can see, there's a preview and review of Age of Empires: The Age of Kings on issue 5 and 6. Do you want just the review or both? Thanks. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 18:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Using that method, I still only get the preview and review from issue 5 and 6. Am I missing something? Anyway, I should be able to get them to you some time today. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 07:06, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I've sent you the preview via e-mail. I should be able to send you the review tomorrow. Sorry about that—I'm a bit tied up with homework. I hope this helps! Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 21:45, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I've sent the review now. DHMO, are you planning on taking this to FA? Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 10:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, got both. I'm slowly getting at an AoE series FT, and yeah, I would like to get this one featured eventually. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

If you need anything, or want me to have a look at the article before it goes to FA, just let me know. I want to repay you for all the help you've given me at SSBM, which looks like it's going to reach FA. Thanks. Ashnard _Talk ^Contribs 07:35, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I sure hope it gets FA, you really deserve it! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Opeth

Hey, if you have time, would you mind performing a copyedit on Opeth? That is the only thing holding it back from being promoted. Feel free not to. Thanks, —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 18:27, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Good thing you asked today and not yesterday; I had a million other requests then! I'll try and get to it. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Has anybody told you that you rule? If so I'll say it again: you rule. —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 01:00, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh all right, just for that I'll get to it. I promise. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Everything you've listed has been taken care of. Thanks, —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 06:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, the bio is the only reliable source I found. This page is awesome. —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 07:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

You should go for it some time! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Me as an admin!?! Thanks! I'm shocked, pleased and terrified that somebody said that, lol! I think it would be pretty friggen cool to be one. I added your "IR sysop" image to my UP. If you aren't one yet, then I don't know if I could be. I've gotten warnings about civility a couple itmes so I bet that it wouldn't work out so well. What exactly do admins have access to? —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 08:30, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

See WP:ADMIN. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

That would be pretty cool. Why aren't you an admin? —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 21:39, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Clem Hill

Hi H₂O. Just letting you know I have now answered your question here. Your thoughts, advice and assistance would be most welcome. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 06:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Will look. Ta, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Irreplaceable

Just passed the article. Comments/Supports/Opposes are welcomed. --Efe (talk) 07:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay

There must be some straaaange rules here.

So let me get this straight here.

Something happened on a TV show that had approximately 2.5 million people watch it.

There is apparently some dispute that it really happened.

You Tube has a clip of this TV show, that anyone who wasn't amongst those 2.5 million people who watched it live can watch to see it and prove that what had happened really happened.

This clip is apparently a copyright violation.

If its not a copyright violation, there is a suggestion that it's not a reliable source, even though its a pretty obvious copy of the show itself, that can be verified by the 2.5 million people that saw it.

And without that clip, you're left with personal testimony from one of the 2.5 million people who saw it, or one of the however many people that saw the clip.

And without the clip, you at least seem to dispute that it really happened.

Somewhere along the lines there, sanity has escaped, and what we are left with is idiocy, and red tape gone crazy. Dyinghappy (talk) 14:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Sindy article GA nom

Hi, I think I have now addressed everything you brought up in your GA review. Could you please take a look at the article? Thanks! Somno (talk) 09:39, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Yay! Don't worry, I haven't forgotten what I said. I'll tackle my first review tomorrow. :) Somno (talk) 00:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Yay! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I have done my first review (Geelong, Victoria), but I think I got a bit carried away with being thorough! Oh well, the important thing is that I've started. Somno (talk) 01:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Phew, impressive! You did that long article justice - I always find it difficult to review the long ones, so great work there. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 02:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I think next time I'll choose a shorter article rather than tackle another long one straight away. Somno (talk) 03:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

RFA thanks

		Thanks for the support
		Thanks for your support on my request for adminship. I'm shocked, too, as it passed 92/2/2. I'll try and stay brilliant with these fun new tools. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

BTW, sorry to bug you. I have an article on FAC right now - Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Effects of Hurricane Ivan in the Lesser Antilles and South America. User:SandyGeorgia requested for a look-through of the article, as it is close to passing. Do you think you'd be able to give the article a look? Thanks if you can, but if not, no problem. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Actually, scratch that. However, if you're still up for it, could you comment on another FAC of mine - Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tropical Storm Vamei. Thanks if you can, but, again, if you can't or don't want to, no prob. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Deadline - March not May

Re this, you meant March, not May, right? Carcharoth (talk) 09:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks for that. *is stupid* dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 09:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Image:David,larry.JPG

My last edit says where. Come on Giggy, get it together! :D east.718 at 10:25, March 18, 2008

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Tambalane Taste the Pain Prayer (song) Knock Me Down Axiom (Australian band) Jesse Tobias Humpers Mandawuy Yunupingu Porphyry copper deposit Fire Party Roger Davies (manager) Cliff Martinez T. F. Much Ballroom Suck My Kiss Trepanation Athol Guy Arik Marshall Love Rollercoaster Chain Reaction (band)

Cleanup Stadium Arcadium Andrew Farriss Victoria University, Australia Merge Santa maria de iquique Freedom (Robbie Williams song) Pompatus Add Sources Zum zum zum Missy Higgins Otherside Wikify Dude, Where's My Car? Twenty20 Oakley Haldeman Expand Billy Thorpe & the Aztecs What Is This? Seasons in the Abyss

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

WRC

Feel like bringing the lead and everything up to date so it's all ready for post-release reviews and charts to be listed, making it ready for GA? It's in pretty good shape and just needs some water (H₂O) thrown over it and see what dries up. I'm busy, and would otherwise do it. --rm 'w avu 23:19, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Bah...not overly into Powderfinger stuff right now. Clogged up with RL and FACs and other stuff. No hurry; get to it when you're ready. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 00:38, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Jet (band)

Hi. I notice you replaced the logo in the name field of the infobox there. You might want to read Template talk:Infobox Musical artist where this has been debated extensively. The consensus is that this is a text-only field, that logos are not automatically encyclopedic, and that the few exceptions to this should be handled by adding them to the body of the article with a referenced explanation of why they are worthy of inclusion. --John (talk) 00:48, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Aah, I see. Feel free to change it as you see fit. Sorry 'bout that. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 00:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

No problem at all. I took it out again already but I wanted to let you know why I was doing it. Best wishes, --John (talk) 01:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Estelle Blackburn article

I've noted that you are the author/part author of several highly-rated articles and I'd very much appreciate you reviewing the Estelle Blackburn article which I have commenced. I'm doing this sooner than I would have preferred in the article's development (i.e. after proper citation and expanded links and other references) but I am at an impasse on certain inclusions which Cygnis Insignis is objecting to and which I believe are actually worthy of retention.

I would like to include a couple of sections in the article which precis the educational and career details of the subject. Cygnis is removing them on the pretext that they should be incorporated into the main text or deleted. My intended approach was to give a fluently-written overview in the main text and recapitulate with more specific details in the precis sections. As to notability; if anyone is interested in the subject's life at all, who's to say that the materials in the precis would not be of interest to them? They could be incorporated as hide-bar sections or sized-down "fact-boxes" such as one finds in newspaper articles. Why don't I like that stuff in the main text of articles? Because it reminds me of the old Soviet joke: "What happened in 1883? - Lenin's thirteenth birthday." I notice that it becomes a dreary and unmemorable litany on the lines of "In (year) he did this. In (year) he did that. In (year) he..and so on. Frankly, if that's how it has to be, I couldn't be bothered writing any more of it; essentially because I detest reading material written in that style. I don't intend this as a request for dispute resolution; I'm simply stating the background and asking for your opinion on how to best progress the article. Retarius | Talk 01:22, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Generally, hide-bar sections are a bad idea and I agree with what Cygnis did in this case. I see your concern about writing in a "year, action, year, action" form...it does get dull, but you don't have to do it that way. You can have sections devoted to educational/career details that aren't governed by time...just put the information in as you please. In response to My intended approach was to give a fluently-written overview in the main text and recapitulate with more specific details in the precis sections., I believe general consensus is to give a good overview in the intro, and go into detail in the sections. I know this isn't exactly how you'd like the article...but it does have consensus, and it my opinion it's a better way. In any case, good luck with the article, and I hope this helps a bit... dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Yesterday and Today

Thanks for your evaluation and suggestions. Cheers, GentlemanGhost (talk) 03:09, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

"Why not?"

An abrasive personality, an unwillingness to let my intelligence be insulted, and a collection of enemies -- and I do mean enemies -- likely to come out of the woodwork the moment I am nominated/nominate myself for admin status. Hells bells, I've even got my own libellous page on Encyclopedia Dramatica and User:Everyking's even gone onto Wikipedia Review to denounce me and rage that I ought to be blocked indefinitely. So thanks, but I'm not willing to be put through the wringer that is WP:RFA for the very real probability of failing. --Calton | Talk 12:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Good answer. Valid point. But think of the children! Ultimately the project loses out, I guess. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 12:25, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Oh snap, the DEA is an admin

ASIMO I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which I'm very glad to say was successful at 81/7/0. Some of the very best that Wikipedia has to offer came out to support or oppose me and the kind words from all the editors has really given me confidence to be an admin and I can't wait to start. I will take the advice of the opposes and not jump into any content disputes immediately. As well, I will try to add more content myself. Anyways, in thanks for participating in my RfA, here's your very own personal humanoid robot. Enjoy! --ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk - Contribs) 13:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Trip to the Moon

I've addressed most of your suggestions regarding A Trip to the Moon. Since I moved what was the third paragraph in the lead to the new section called "Analysis," I didn't lengthen the 2nd paragraph of the lead. Also, I don't think a "reception" section is necessary because the 2nd paragraph of the lead is about the reception. Thanks. --GHcool (talk) 21:33, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Michael Symes GA Review

Hi there, I've addressed what points I can regarding the GA review of Michael Symes. Unfortunately I've looked for any details about his personal life but can't find anything beyond what is already on the page. Peanut4 (talk) 00:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Maynard James Keenan

I know you did the GA. Think you could do a PR? It's been improved a good deal since GA. <3 ya!! Lara❤Love 05:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Environmental issues with the Three Gorges Dam

Hey there, This article has been split from the original Three Gorges Dam article, and now there is talk of a re-merge. Would you be good enough to offer an opinion please... thanks, Johnfos (talk) 07:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

A Trip to the Moon

 Done -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 08:27, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Smile

Hope I'm not talking out of turn here but, ya know, you are doing great work, much more important than admin mopping up or anything like that. You are doing article writing and reviewing that is the essential basis of WP. And it is you who have the good humour! best wishes, Johnfos (talk) 10:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

You rock too, mate. Totally. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:03, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Hey H20 - thanks for your support on my recently unsuccessful RfA. After some more intensive coaching (now from Keep AND Balloonman), I hope to be back in a few months for another run at it. Hope to have your support then. Thanks again - Tanthalas39 (talk) 15:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cannon.

Okay, I'll move them down. · AndonicO ^Hail! 01:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Give me a couple of minutes though, I'm finishing the penultimate one now. · AndonicO ^Hail! 01:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:09, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... actually, you know what, I think it would be better to leave it that way, for Nishkid's convenience. If he wants to review, those comments would make it easier.</lazy bastard> · AndonicO ^Hail! 01:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Those comments are so small it's impossible to read it...thus making it equally useful when you hide them. Get to work! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

...*sighs* I've been working the whole day. Maybe this helps? · AndonicO ^Hail! 01:21, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Not really...meh, don't worry about it. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sceptre 3

Well, I surely didn't mean any offense by it - but I hadn't asked that question in awhile. Just wanted to make sure this one knows policy as his longevity suggests. ArcAngel (talk) 02:33, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Well, I would AGF that he does. Especially after that discussion at WT:RFA re. ridiculous numbers of questions. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 02:33, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Re:Unsuccessful GAN at Vincenzo Camporini

All of the references are in a {{cite web}} format or {{cite interview}} format. Not arguing, I will try to make it better. ~ Cheers! Dreamy ^§ 13:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

my RFA

Thank you! Thank you for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (73/3/1), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! :) Aleta Sing 17:01, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Tasmanian Barnstar

Hi DHMO. I noticed that you were the creator of the Australian Barnstar. I have tried to create one for Wikiproject Tasmania, but not being a whiz at graphical things, it looks kind of wrong. Would you be willing to try and get it to look a bit more normal?? It is at: Template:The Tasmanian Barnstar Merit. Cheers, Robert Fleming (talk) 15:39, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. As you could probably tell graphics things aren't really my area! Robert Fleming (talk) 09:05, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

No, mine neither. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 09:29, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Happy easter!

Open your card >> >> >>

Happy easter you guys! Sorry if the picture looked crappy, but it's the best I could do on such short notice. Sincerely, BoL (Talk) 04:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Credits: This card was inspired by BoL, an administrator/bureaucrat and head designer of Codesnippets. Join the community today!

Re:Barnstar

Many thanks. I do admit that my editing has fallen a bit after getting the sysop bit, but that's probably more related to real world events than anything else. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 07:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

More than welcome. Keep it up, you're doing great! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:03, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for that ;) And thanks for removing that #2 section, I was going to do that the other day, but I completely forgot. Ss112 (Talk here!) 08:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Azaria is the new ACOTF

Azaria Chamberlain disappearance is the new Australian collaboration. Please help to improve it in any way you can. --Scott Davis ^Talk 14:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

The Crucified

Hey, could you check out The Crucified and Talk:The Crucified and give us your opinion on the matter Please and thank you. —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 22:20, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

I {{cite web}}ed your {{fact}}. —Burningclean _{[Speak the truth!]} 19:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Now that the notability matteris addressed, do you think I am okay to take it to GAN? Burningclean _[speak] 02:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

If you like. I suppose there isn't any more content anywhere? dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 02:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Not reliable. Burningclean _[speak] 17:17, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Meh. GAs are cheap. Go for it. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 04:32, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Would youi like to review??? Burningclean _[speak] 19:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Nah, I'm involved. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Ahh, I see. Burningclean _[speak] 00:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I've got three other articles at GAN, if your board. No problem if you don't. I don't even know if I'm supposed to ask. Good luck with Silverchair, I see it being promoted in a couple days. Burningclean _[speak] 02:52, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I sure hope it is. I'll try and do some more GAN reviews tonight - you can help too! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I should do some reviews. I'm running out of stuff to do. Maby I need to take a break sometime. That feels impossible though! Burningclean _[speak] 20:51, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

The Chronic

I have made all the changes that you requested in your review of The Chronic and was hoping that you could look over it in its present state. Thanks. - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 22:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the thorough review of the article. I was wondering if you had any suggestions on how to improve the article to FA status ? Thanks - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 14:19, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll leave some notes on the talk page. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Laughs

I want to nom you to be an admin so badly. Your page def sums up the nonsense that we put people through at RfA. MBisanz ^talk 09:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Maybe one day. I don't feel ready for an RfA just yet. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Lions (album) GAN

Thank you for taking the time to review the article, and thanks for noting your concerns. I believe I've addressed all of them (see talk page). Take a look when you get a chance. —Zeagler (talk) 13:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Will look ASAP. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject report on Video Games

Are you co-answering the questions with Jacoplane (talk · contribs)? If so, the questions will be up soon. I'll write the intro in the morning. Rudget. 19:12, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd be happy to answer, though Jaco probably knows more about it than me. Keep in touch. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Will do. It might not get published until Tuesday because of Ral's illness (although maybe that was just last week). If there are any remaining I'll post them here. :) And by the way, I'm doing the Australia Project next week. Rudget. 12:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Sweet! You're talking to Longhair (talk · contribs), I presume? Again, happy to chat about that one. :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out in the reports answers. Very much appreciated. Rudget. 11:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Gothic II: The Night of the Raven

“ Hey, you might already know about this, but it makes things really easy for everyone if you sign your comments, using ~~~~. See also Template:Tilde and Template:Sign. It just makes things easier for everyone. Thanks for improving the article! Cheers, ”

Yes, I knew about the tides, but I wasn't sure whether you were supposed to also sign in pages like that. Sorry anyway.

I fixed it, but by only adding [[User: Diego pmc|diego_pmc]], so that the dates wouldn't be messed up. diego_pmc (talk) 07:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

not a problem. General practice is to sign your comments on all pages where you're interacting with people (so as a general rule, everywhere but articles). Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Ping

You. Email. Now. Daniel (talk) 08:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Replied. I like. Btw. get on Commons. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

No. Commons evil. Short sentences cool. Daniel (talk) 08:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

You. IRC. Now. Daniel (talk) 08:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

You. I pinged. You. Before. I got. This message. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 08:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

No news yet :( Will keep you posted. Daniel (talk) 22:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Commons cat

Might want to add yourself here. There's even some nice userboxes ({{User admin Wikicommons}} and {{User Commons/Administrator}}). --Agüeybaná 13:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

 Done. Thanks! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: :(

Have you talked to Andreasegde? He's been awfully...quiet. :| Kodster (Talk) 00:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Irreplaceable

I've addressed some of your comments and left replies as well. Thank you for the review. --Efe (talk) 01:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Please re-check the FAC page. I left comments there. Just reflect any querries/comments/objections you have. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 10:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, missed your first now. Will consider my stance on that now. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Its fine. Thanks for the support. I'm still addressing some comments of Tony1 about prose issues and Sandy and Ealdgyth's objections about reliability of the sources. I believe I can settle these soon. Grats for Bernard Fanning and good luck for Silverchair. --Efe (talk) 11:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks on both counts! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 11:08, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Done with "Confessions Part II". Thanks for the review. --Efe (talk) 11:56, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Since you already supported, could you please hide your comments to shorten the page? Thanks DM. --Efe (talk) 03:24, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Feel free to hide my comments as necessary. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Ok. Please, if you still have the time, re-visit "Confessions Part II". Thanks. --Efe (talk) 04:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thriller album

Hi would you make a second opionion on the thriller album. Hes left a 1 line statement about the article, it doesnt make much sense, not sure what he wants to do or to be done with article, Cheers. Realist2 (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm going to relist the article at GAN. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Is there a way you can speech to that user about his actions. I posted three messages on his page asking for feedback, advise on improvements etc to which he never replied to me personally or on the talk page. He never left advise on the talk page and never changed the HOLD sign at the nomination list. I have spent months working on that article and his actions were entirely disrespectfull. Im now going to have to wait another month before our turn comes back around. Realist2 (talk) 13:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Your article is fairly close to the top of the list, so you shouldn't have to wait long. I'll speak to the user if something like this comes up again. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Milk's RfA

# "I would love to take it one step further" (Q1) - not comfortable with someone who would enjoy blocking. Come on now H20... isn't that what Admins do on a regular basis for fun ;-) Balloonman (talk) 05:47, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocking; yes. Loving it; not so much. I dunno, I'm not an admin here, but on Commons I don't particularly enjoy taking away someone's ability to edit. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

This was intended as a joke... ;-) I mention it because I don't want you to hold this against Milk... eventhough I am opposing him as well.Balloonman (talk) 22:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/SS Christopher Columbus

Thanks for your comments at SS CC! I notice that you have since supported (yay!), but I'm unsure if any of the issues you raised still needs to be addressed. Would you mind either capping addressed issues inside something like {{hide}}, or striking them out? It would help us keep better track of unresolved issues. Thank you! Maralia (talk) 15:03, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Feel free to hide my comments as necessary. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

FAC for SS Chris

thanks for your many comments. can you do the collapsing box thing? :) I'm trying to see what's left, it's a bit hard :) Lar: t/c 04:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Er, nvm I see you were asked already. Lar: t/c 04:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Feel free to hide my comments as necessary. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Courtesy reply:

Thanks for the kind words - however, as you may or may not have noticed, I am no longer editing at Wikipedia (apart from here) after my vampire-FAC-meltdown. I did receive coaching from Firsfron after I'd put my name up for admin coaching, and I'd planned to run in April for adminship. However, as I mentioned, I plan to be gone a long time - if not forever - but it was nice to hear from you. Hopefully I'll come back some day... Cheers, Spawn Man (talk) 07:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

That's a shame...:( Hope to see you back one day. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 03:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Gilberto Gil

Wondered if you wanted to take a look at the Gilberto Gil peer review, as you listed yourself on the volunteers list. I know you always have a million people asking for stuff like this (and a current FAC), but if you could give a few comments, that would be great. --Kakofonous (talk) 18:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Done with your comments on the Gil PR and with the Cool Kids comments as well. Thanks, --Kakofonous (talk) 14:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm on my way on both counts. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 06:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

...aaand done with Positive Black Soul as well. --Kakofonous (talk)

Thanks for the pass. --Kakofonous (talk) 23:34, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

FAC caps

I see you're getting requests to hide your comments at FAC once they're resolved; feel free to tell nominators that caps aren't required, and Sandy doesn't care if comments are uncapped; I care if I can tell if issues are resolved, and a subsequent Support implies that issues are resolved  :-) I do like the cap, but don't pretend that others need to or should use them. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:43, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

That's good to know, thanks for the note. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

I thank you very kindly for your message. I left an explanation on my page. :)--andreasegde (talk) 18:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Hope to see you again soon. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations

...on getting another article to FA status. Well done. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 01:33, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Eek...8 now! Thanks, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Silverchair

Congrats on the FA! One minor thing though, I think only the first mention of a Publisher among the references needs to be wikilinked, whereas here, they are all linked. For eg: every instance of Rolling Stone and AMG is wikilinked while only the first time should each be linked. So could you remove the overlinks? Thanks :) indopug (talk) 18:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I've written a big long essay, somewhere, on why I think it's worth wikilinking the publisher every time. I'll go find it one day...but for now I'd rather they stayed. Just imagine I have a good reason ;) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 22:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

We did it, SS Chris is a Featured Article!

yaay!

Thanks for your help in getting the good ship SS Christopher Columbus to Featured Article status. The nomination went swimmingly, it was clear sailing all the way, no one turned up to torpedo it, and she passed easily.

that's the ticket!

Giggy, you got things off to a great start, and I never needed to use that other resource you pointed me at! Lar: t/c 22:30, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

International Mathematical Olympiad

 Done Nousernamesleft^{copper, not wood} 19:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

 Done. 23:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Australian Musical Group being worked on for an FAC

Hey H20, I have an Australian musical group on my watch list. The primary editor is trying to get the article to FA status. As you appear to be interested in Australian Musical groups and an expert at getting things to FA status, your thoughts/insight/help would be appreciated. Also, I should have a response to your query on my talk page in a few minutes.Balloonman (talk) 19:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I helped out a bit in that article's last FAC. It's on my watchlist now, I'll try and boost it up a bit. Oh, and I got the reply on your talk - will talk further there. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

United Abominations

All done. Thanks for the review again. Burningclean _[speak] 20:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

All passed - you're welcome. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Congrats for Silverchair. Burningclean _[speak] 00:13, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Did you notice anything that is needed in order for United Abominations to be featured? I'd like for it to be, but it is my first album article so I don't quite know what I am doing. Burningclean _[speak] 00:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Take a look at some of mine...Internationalist (album) is my best, while Californication (album) is something I've used as a model a few times. Could do with more reception, I think, and the prose can always be improved. That's just at a glance. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 00:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Do you think I should do another peer review? Not much was done in the last one. Burningclean _[speak] 00:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

That's probably a good idea. I might pitch in a bit after a few others do, if you like. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 00:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Okay, Wikipedia:Peer review/United Abominations/archive2. Mind reviewing? Sorry for taking a while to reply, there was a huge database lag. Burningclean _[speak] 01:04, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Metroid Prime 3 - Peer Review

I would greatly appreciate it if you could leave some more comments in the Corruption Peer Review. I've tried looking for a script of the game on IGN/GF, but I can only find documents that copy "log books" from the game. I have the game, but it would be really tedious to play through it again and note every dialogue :-p. Thanks for the advice/suggestions :) --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  23:02, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure thing, I'll do a read through of it today, and I'll try and find some dialogue stuff somewhere too. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :) --  ShadowJester07  ►Talk  00:13, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

1995 Japanese Grand Prix

Hi DiM. I was wondering (mainly because your such a good GA reviewer!) whether you could possibly when you have a spare half an hour review the 1995 Japanese Grand Prix article. I'm asking as it was reviewed earlier, but the reviewer passed it without reviewing the article correctly. Could you possibly review it for GA-status for me? Much appreciated, D.M.N. (talk) 09:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure thing, I'll try to get to it ASAP. I didn't see the GA pass in the history though? Anyways, I'll take a look. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

The GA pass was here, but it wasn't reviewed properly. Anyway, I've replied to your comments. Thanks! :) D.M.N. (talk) 14:13, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the link - you're right, that wasn't the best review. :S I'll take a look at my stuff. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

GA

Hi ive added another article to the GA list, List of best selling albums world-wide. Ive put it in the music list but im not 100% sure its appropriate their. It might need to go in miscellaneous ? Could you get back to me at my talk page. Cheers.Realist2 (talk) 01:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

That was quich, cheers, oh and my Thriller article STILL hasnt been looked at. Im considering becoming a reviewer, you guys look like you need help with that backlog. Realist2 (talk) 01:42, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Just got your second message. Ok ill take it there. cheers. Realist2 (talk) 01:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do some reviews, we could do with some help! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:43, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Sure I will ill read up all the info tomorrow, its nearly 3 am in the morning where i am now but ill look into it tomorrow. Realist2 (talk) 01:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I reviewed an article, hope i did ok. Realist2 (talk) 04:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I took a look, your reviews seemed OK. A fair bit of detail, etc., and that's always nice. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Bungie GAN

I think I've gotten to all your issues. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^(talk) 02:23, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Hi, I saw your post on Balloonman's talk about RfAs and such, and was wondering if you'd like a nomination from me when the time comes. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 05:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, yeah, when the time is right. Feel free to take part in the coaching in the meantime, as I did in yours! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

The Chronic

Hi, i put The Chronic article up for a peer review and have improved on the parts suggested by a user, do you think I should nominate it as a FAC yet ? - Guerilla In Tha Mist (talk) 15:30, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

No harm in going for FAC, I'd say. The worst case scenario is that you're not successful and you can try again when the issues are resolved. Tell me when it's up! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Sharkface217/Award Center – Hopefully a more productive task

I noticed the above project today and the MfD so I decided to balance things up a bit. Hopefully, the chance of a barnstar will encourage some of the participants to take up a task that is vital so as not to scare away new editors and to not shamelessly disregard their (possibly valuable) content. Regards, EJF (talk) 21:09, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, I'm still not overly keen on the entire idea of the center, though your challenge seems (to me) a bit better than some of the other ones there (though it's still gameable, which still moves towards the attitude of doing things for barnstars, which is bad...and that's my main issue with the whole thing). Thanks for the note, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:33, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Personally, I don't think it or the reward board are really suitable for what is a volunteer encyclopedia, as I consider the reward to be the finished product, ie. the encyclopedia, but if other editors enjoy a structured setting where worthwhile tasks can be completed I have nothing against it, and good luck to them. Happy editing, EJF (talk) 16:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

A message from WarthogDemon.

Korean Fir I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, was unsuccessful with 61 support, 25 oppose, and 4 neutral. I've been taking the advice of the Opposes into practice and hopefully I can improve myself. Once again, thank you. ^_^

Irreplaceable

The article is now featured. Thanks for the help and leave me a message if you have more concerns. --Efe (talk) 01:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Nice work! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

ty. Burningclean's United Abomination is on PR now; would you like to review? --Efe (talk) 01:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Nah, I'd rather wait until it's changed a bit; I'm familiar with it at the moment as GA reviewer. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 01:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Ah, I see. I've already left comments there. =) --Efe (talk) 01:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

...for the heads up to the AN/I thread. The reporter talk is serially uncivil user:M1rth. Anthony was going to start up an RfC last week, and never got around to it (looked like M1rth was going away). I guess I'll need to respond at AN/I. Jd2718 (talk) 01:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome. I dunno if that IP is M1rth's, and I don't want to speculate, but if it is than could be considered disruptive. I saw your comment on Redrocket's talk and I agree with you on the removing of banned user's comments. But not everyone shares that view, so just be careful! Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 02:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Help

I have to be using the monobook skin don't I? Doctor Will Thompson (talk) 09:17, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Doctor Will Thompson (talk) 09:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

RE: GAN reviewing

oh right, sorry. That was my first GA review. I shall read your noob guide fully :D Thanks for the advice. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 09:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Come to think of it, I have been there a few times, mainly nomming. And, you're welcome! weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 09:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Alt-rock barnstar

Thanks. Let me know when you get into Nick Cave territory; I've got plenty of interviews to cite. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Get back to me after this. Also, it takes a special kind of awesome to duet on a murder ballad with Kylie Minogue. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:26, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Funny enough, like a month ago I thought to myself, "Y'know, I should see what Powderfinger actually sounds like" and went searching for videos on YouTube. As an aside, the Brits have their fair share of good tunes I'd recommend you check out. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

:')

I am driven by selfish reasons and the possibility of getting some grilled cheese sandwiches--Yamanbaiia^{(free hugs!)} 10:07, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

What a noble aim! :) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Mary Seacole

Thanks for the edit summary. And please give my thank to your fellow Aussie members, they did a great job. I especially liked your answer to the 'cabal' question :) Rudget. 10:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

...what cabal question? ;) dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Would you do a really big favour for me? Could you close Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:James Bond as no consensus. Me and OhanaUnited have commented and aren't able to close it. Ta. Rudget. 10:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

 Done. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 10:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/Baby Boy (song)/archive1

Its been a while since you reviewed this article in GAN; so, if you have, would you please visit its PR page? Thank you. --Efe (talk) 11:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

jd2718 the sock fiend

now hes lying out his ass on the ani page but I can't comment. and no im not this m1rth person, im just me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.30.205.23 (talk) 12:17, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

You should be able to edit ANI now, but I haven't seen anything to make me believe you. Good luck, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

I can has mop?

Hi Giggy/Archive/March 2008! Thank you for your support in my RfA (87/3/3). I truely appreciate the many votes of confidence, and I will exert myself to live up to those expectations. Thanks again! - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 17:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Editors Good Article Nomination Review

Hi, thanks for reviewing the article on Editors. I've addressed all the issues you have raised so do you think you could take a look at it again to see if it's ok? The only problem I had was changing the image to Wikipedia Commons - all the licensing is quite confusing so if you could help me with that I'd appreciate it. Thanks.Wikipéire (talk) 21:17, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey there, I'll try and take another look at some stage today. In the meantime, the CommonsHelper tool can do all the work for you. When you're done with that, add {{subst:ncd}} to the image page on Wikipedia. Hope this helps, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 23:14, 31 March 2008 (UTC)