User talk:Fawcett5/Archive7

Please add new comments in new sections. Thanks in advance. Fawcett5

DoCB Initiative - verified/wikified

Caught your comments on a couple of the stubs I did for the project. ( I did a number of the Taschereau family plus some other folks). If I do any more, I will try to get the date thing straight..won't verify unless i do. I tried to figure out the template for dates but couldn't. My big problem is that I am on a land line for internet so I try to work off-line and then post articles fairly quickly. I need more time to look and learn...(santa didn't bring me the satellite hook-up I requested. :-) ) I am open to suggestions as to improving my input but do have the "air time" problem. (Stormbay 23:05, 5 January 2006 (UTC))[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Infobox Biography

Template:Infobox Biography has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Infobox Biography. Thank you. DreamGuy 07:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DoCB copyvio?

What's up with that? The whole set of Dictionary of Canadian Biography pages have been relocated. --Big_Iron 23:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was told that I created this list, and I've made so many of these lists that I didn't even bother to check before I moved it. They are copyvios, though, not like phone books, because they only include names that were specifically selected by that organization as being prominent people. Since significant creativity was put into making the list, it is copyrightable, and they've chosen to copyright it. You should probably move it to your user space. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-01-19 13:50
Actually, I'll move them all under Wikipedia:Canadian wikipedians' notice board/Dictionary of Canadian Biography. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-01-19 13:53

You are wrong, they do not copyright the list of names, they only assert a copyright on the biographies themselves, which we do not reproduce. The list was something *I* created (at great effort, and in a form that is nowhere used by DoCB) by extracting the names from all of the biographies. In any case, this is not a commercial enterprise that we are some way competing against... they say only that...

- users exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced;
- the Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online be identified as the source; and
- the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the materials reproduced, or as having been made in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the University of Toronto, the Université Laval and the National Archives of Canada.

Fawcett5 20:45, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe that having a list is a copyright violation. I just took a look at the copyright notice. The second sentance of the link provided above states, "The biographies, for which the University of Toronto and the Université Laval hold the copyright, and the Web site are protected by the provisions of the Copyright Act, by Canadian laws, policies and regulations, and by international agreements." We haven't copied the biographies. So, we were fine in regards to the copyright. Also, I will move the Dictionary of Canadian Biography page back into the regular namespace. I can't imagine what problem that might have with that page. -- JamesTeterenko 20:54, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Do the names as lited in (http://www.utoronto.ca/dcb-dbc/dcba/listOfSubjects/l.htm) correspond to the DoCB list of wiki fame in terms of format? (Stormbay 23:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Stormbay, I'm not sure if I understand exactly what you mean, but the names are not in wikipedia format (i.e. wikified and in firstname lastname order), nor are they disambiguated as many of the DoCB names are, nor have they been "verified" as we have been doing when a wiki article is created. I was not aware of nor did I use those pages to create the DoCB list. I hope this helps answer your question. Fawcett5 16:46, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fawcett5, can I just check on your last statement where you said you didn't use the pages to create your list. How did you create the list? If you didn't simply copy that of the DoCB then there is no copyright infringement as you've generated the list seperately, and that probably is also true if you read the book and wrote out a list of people in it. Kcordina ^Talk 12:29, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adminship

(Re: Your message of October 2005.) Sorry I never replied, I was still trying to sort out the new job and put everything to one side to reply to later, never did bother doing anything about it. Anyway, thanks for the offer, though somebody has now gone ahead and jumped in front of you! Joe D (t) 02:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wombat and "3000 miles from Graceland"

Hi! Why did you remove the reference to "3000 miles from Graceland" from the "Wombats in Popular Culture" section? пан Бостон-Київський 17:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I had only meant to revert the addition of the bold facing, not the whole section. My mistake. Fawcett5 04:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page name for temperature articles

To avoid flip-flopping between 'degree Fahrenheit' and 'Fahrenheit' or 'degree Celsius' and 'Celsius', I propose that we have a discussion on which we want. I see you have contributed on units of measurement, please express your opinion at Talk:Units of measurement. Thanks. bobblewik 22:09, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Francis_Pegahmagabow's_medals.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Francis_Pegahmagabow's_medals.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:James_Horace_King.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:James_Horace_King.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

:Image:Rappahannok River.jpg

Hallo Fawcett5, would you mind to upload this picture into commons.wikipedia.org ? I would like to use it in the German version --Bahnmoeller 20:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Yves_Pratte.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Yves_Pratte.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 19:34, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

DoCB Lists

For what it is worth, I have done a little research and do not agree that the pages are a copyvio. However, I can't find anyone who might carry some weight to stick their neck out and write a letter. Any progress? (or have you given up in disgust?) (Stormbay 22:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Maybe I overstated "expert" but I was having a conversation with a lawyer friend of mine and I brought up the subject. (Bear in mind that free advice is worth what you pay for it). He has spent 30 /- years in a firm that does mostly corporate stuff which has included copyright issues. He said that, if it is essentially a list, it is no different than a telephone directory. In a telephone directory, everyone has access to the use of the list which in turn is used to actually access the product. (I should have written it down but that's the gist of it). I don't think this adds anything new to the argument and I apologize if I raised some expectations in my note above. My guess would be that this is no big deal to the DoCB people. However, I gather it is to some folks here. (Stormbay 22:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

DCB list copyvios

Hi there. I see that the Copyright problem page has been blanked out. So, do you think we can just remove the tags and move on with life? -- JamesTeterenko 01:16, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems to me that no consensence to delete was achieved, so it seems to me fine to go ahead. Fawcett5 07:08, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Naval General Service Medal

I don't know if you're watching the Talk:British and Commonwealth orders and decorations page, but I've put up an answer to your question of the 8th March re. the above medal. Hope it helps.

Regards, Xdamr 11:46, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jacknstock

You blocked this user in September last year, indefinitely. I wasn't an admin then, so I don't know if it was ever brought up to ANI. However, the user had made only four edits, and seems to have remained remarkably civil on his talk page. could I request that you either look his case over, or post info about the indef block (as most admins do) to WP:ANI for other admins to look at it? Cheers, NSL E _{(T C)} at 07:15 UTC (2006-05-26)

I've posted this case to ANI, as you seem to be not consistently active on Wikipedia nowadays. NSL E _{(T C)} at 06:46 UTC (2006-05-27)

FranzBoas.jpg tag update?

Hi Fawcett5, the fair use tag used for Image:FranzBoas.jpg has become obsolete. I see the source link is no longer active; can you update the tag? (We'd love to be able to continue using the image.) Thanks, Nectar 10:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CPRinYoho.jpg

In going through articles tagging them with {{TrainsWikiProject}} today, I came across Image:CPRinYoho.jpg that you uploaded. I wanted to put it up as a candidate for the Portal:Trains Selected image, but the image does not have a proper license tag on it. As the original uploader of the image, please take a look add the appropriate tag to prevent its deletion. Thanks. Slambo (Speak) 18:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:World's Tallest Totem Pole, Victoria, British Columbia.JPG

This is a wonderful image! I want to nominate it for WP:FPC but I am wondering about the license. it says:

This file has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder, its copyright has expired, or it is ineligible for copyright.

It says you created the image, if so it would help if you could change the licensing template to {{PD-Self}}. Thanks! HighInBC 17:43, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated HighInBC 17:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bio Box Reverted

I see that you have reverted my addition of the Biography Project box to talk pages for Laurier Lapierre and Gordie Howe. It seemed to me that these articles both qualified for that project. Is there some reason why including them in the bio project proposal would not be appropriate? Ahh, I think I just figured it out. It looks like I put them on the main page by mistake. Sorry about that. I will go ahead and put them on the talk page instead. KenWalker | Talk 17:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander MacGregor

Please stop blind reverting this article into an attack article. Your version does nothing to establish notability of this individual, and would require the deletion of the article. Furthermore, it violates the terms of WP:BIO... you can have controversy in a biography, but you cannot have an article that is solely an attack peice, no matter how sourced your material is. Bastique▼^parler _voir 19:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the article. Another admin has protected the deletion. Your version completely disavows notariety and therefore must be deleted in accordance to our policies. If you desire further explanation, please email me, as the matter involves some sensitive issues regarding the Foundation. Please do not restore this article, prior to that, however. Bastique▼^parler _voir 18:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You evidently have an agenda. Please do not restore this article. Bastique▼^parler _voir 18:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have your email turned off. Therefore, you have to email me. If you're referring to this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander MacGregor, the result was no consensus. Any information about this individual that qualifies him for notariety, has been deleted in your version of the article as "unsourced" material. Your article has a professor with a criminal history. Nothing worth notariety, and easily deleted in accordance with WP:BIO. Bastique▼^parler _voir 18:21, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm forwarding this to someone better able to represent the foundation in this matter. Please do nothing with the article. I assure you our reasons are valid. Bastique▼^parler _voir 18:53, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tony is not a volunteer correspondent for The Foundation, so "our" doesn't refer to him. I am not authorized to reveal the contents of confidential correspondence sent to the Wikimedia Foundation, and I've made other people aware of the situation. The issues with the article have not been resolved. I will not be sending you an email, but someone will. Bastique▼^parler _voir 19:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Grapefruit seed extract has now been finalized."

I have updated the GSE article by the objective standards of accuracy, neutrality, and completeness.

Now I would like to work on another article. This is amazing how wikipedia works.

Please create a stub for benzethonium chloride since it is not currently covered by wikipedia yet. You have created more articles than anyone I know.

Please consider making a new article for benzethonium chloride. Thanks for everything.

Also, I would like you to create a "redirect page" entitled >>>Citrus seed extract<<< that would link to the grapefruit seed extract article.

I have no idea how to create a redirect page. Thanks for your help. Best Wishes and Good Day, Nicole.

Image:Arthur Kornberg.jpg

hi. i'm writing an article about arthur kornberg for the german wikipedia ([1]), and looking forn an image, i found this picture you've uploaded. could you please upload it into the wikimedia commons, so that i can use it? best wishes, Ameno ([2])

Image copyright problem with Image:Tu95.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tu95.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note

A plagiarism-detector bot has indicated that, in 2005, you copied the article on John Macoun from an external website. I sincerely hope that you have not done this sort of thing again.

The article has been deleted, pending a review. DS 03:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize if my tone upset you. However, I would like to ask you to explain this (www.wikipedia-watch.org/plagiarism/0997.html). DS 18:55, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

- For the record, the plagiarism-detector bot is being run by Daniel Brandt (you may have heard of him?); as such, we have to treat its every report with extreme caution, and make sure that all legal matters are properly addressed. DS 18:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is most offensive. There was no plagiarism, as your review will reveal. I have restored the article, and I certainly do not appreciate the tone which you have adopted with a wikipedia administrator of long standing. Fawcett5 18:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As you should have been able to ascertain with even a moment's inspection of the wikipedia articles history, the item at www.ulsterhistory.co.uk was lifted verbatim from wikipedia, not the other way around. Note how their article includes items that were added to the wikipediaarticle by third parties weeks or months after the initial creation by me. Remember, this IS a free licence encyclopedia, people can and do copy US all the time. Be a bit more thorough next time before tossing around serious and unfounded accusations. Fawcett5 19:01, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Again, I apologize. I had to process some 40 articles last night and this morning, and UlsterHistory's fallacious copyright statement misled me. DS 19:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

new RFC

You may be interested to know that an RFC has recently been initiated regarding Fair use images of Canadian politicians. Many images of Canadian public figures are about to be deleted, including ones you have uploaded. Please feel free to participate. - Mcasey666 04:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tantoo Cardinal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tantoo Cardinal.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 19:42, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Charles-Michel d'Irumberry de Salaberry.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Charles-Michel d'Irumberry de Salaberry.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 07:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Fawcett5, thanks for providing source, it has been moved to commons now. Shyam ^(T/C) 16:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:GeorgeEngelmann.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:GeorgeEngelmann.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 01:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The dude has been dead since 1884 and the source is clearly indicated. This is obviously public domain. Fawcett5 21:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The source is a secondarey source not specifying where it got the image so the image is in practice sourceless. The {{PD-US}} template assumes that the image was first published in the US another calim which would need to be substantiated with a source. However it is true that a photograph of someone who died in 1884 is likely to be PD-old (assuming that the photograph didn't outlive Engellman by 52 years in which case it is copyrighted) so I will therefore let the case rest. /Lokal _Profil 23:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

More replaceable fair use images

—Chowbok ☠ 21:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arthur_Laing.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Arthur_Laing.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it, but use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 21:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image has been restored, as it is clearly covered by the Canada-politician-photo tag. Please do due diligence before thoughtlessly removing perfectly acceptable items. Fawcett5 05:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rex Barnes.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rex Barnes.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 17:45, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More

The same for images:

Image:MSolberg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MSolberg.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Since this man is not dead and is not a fugitive, prisoner, nor recluse, this image can be replaced by a freely-licensed photo. Jesse Viviano 19:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tantramar Marsh.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tantramar Marsh.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wilbert_Joseph_Keon.jpg

I have tagged Image:Wilbert_Joseph_Keon.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Abu badali ^(talk) 21:02, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John_Robert_Holmes.jpg

I have tagged Image:John_Robert_Holmes.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Abu badali ^(talk) 21:10, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Florence_Elsie_Inman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Florence_Elsie_Inman.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 12:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mac_Harb.jpg

I have tagged Image:Mac_Harb.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 19:34, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paul_David.jpg

I have tagged Image:Paul_David.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 19:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paul_Yuzyk.jpg

I have tagged Image:Paul_Yuzyk.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 19:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scott_Simms.jpg

I have tagged Image:Scott_Simms.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 19:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serge_Joyal.jpg

I have tagged Image:Serge_Joyal.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 19:49, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:TheCanadian_with_elk.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:TheCanadian_with_elk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Al_Waxman.jpg

I have tagged Image:Al_Waxman.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew_York_Promotional_Photo.jpg

I have tagged Image:Andrew_York_Promotional_Photo.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. MER-C 11:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Arthur_Kornberg.jpg

I have tagged Image:Arthur_Kornberg.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 10:15, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Author_William_Brandon.jpg

I have tagged Image:Author_William_Brandon.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 07:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Garnet_Rogers.jpg

I have tagged Image:Garnet_Rogers.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 21:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Billy_Van.gif

I have tagged Image:Billy_Van.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. MER-C 11:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Bittrich.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bittrich.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 12:28, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freda_Ahenakew.jpg

I have tagged Image:Freda_Ahenakew.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 20:51, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme Court of Ontario

You created this redirect in February 2006; I think it should be retargeted; please see Talk:Supreme Court of Ontario. --Mathew5000 20:46, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting Permission to Publish Photo

Dear Sir or Madam (Fawcett5), I'm an image research consultant working on behalf of Cengage Learning. We would like to publish your image "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Central_tower_of_the_Nuraghe_at_Saint_Antine_of_Torralba.jpg" in an Italian language textbook. Will you grant us permission to publish your photo? Please contact me at [email protected] . Thank you. Jill Engebretson. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JillEnge (talk • contribs) 03:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Louis Riel

Thank you for your additions on this article to help bring it to feature article status. Do you know of other editors who worked on this article, to let them know....

Louis Riel has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. I am in the process of adding inline citations to help the review process...Can you also help out..? SriMesh | talk 02:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:HughRichardson.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:HughRichardson.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell ^babelfish 02:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Maggie Siggins.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Maggie Siggins.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 05:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Jerry Holland.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Jerry Holland.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree 08:24, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:John Crosbie.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:John Crosbie.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. High on a tree (talk) 01:05, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Tantramar Marsh.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Tantramar Marsh.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot ^(talk) 03:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Norandalogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Norandalogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Valery_Chkalov.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Valery_Chkalov.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Elec

A tag has been placed on Template:Elec requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:59, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pass the barnstars, please!

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I, Basketball110, award Fawcett5 this barnstar for creating so many pages. Where do you get all the time? Basketball one 10 00:27, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maiden voyage

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Maiden voyage, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Richmond_and_Danville_Railroad_Shares.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Richmond_and_Danville_Railroad_Shares.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 18:43, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:George Clyde Nowlan.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:George Clyde Nowlan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —Bkell (talk) 15:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:MNSRwy.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:MNSRwy.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kansas and Pacific Railway Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Kansas and Pacific Railway Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:BenjaminAlvord.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:BenjaminAlvord.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. matt br 13:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lois_Wilson,_founder_of_Al-Anon.gif

I have tagged Image:Lois_Wilson,_founder_of_Al-Anon.gif as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 13:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Arthur Laing.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Arthur Laing.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Basilian Crest.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Basilian Crest.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:CNR Yellowhead.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:CNR Yellowhead.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:CNR Yellowhead.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. BJ^Talk 12:15, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TSElogo.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:TSElogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Louise Marguerite Renaude Lapointe.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Louise Marguerite Renaude Lapointe.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 02:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

John Sparrow David Thompson

Good day. I wonder if you could be of assistance in moving John Thompson (politician) to John Sparrow David Thompson. From your comments on the talk page and history of moving it once, I see you have some familiarity with the man and see he preferred and is still now referred to by all four names. The only variation I have ever seen is in occasionally writing it as John S. D. Thompson but never simply John Thompson. It was brought up nearly a month ago on the talk page and there were no objections and a couple of supports. Thanks, DoubleBlue (Talk) 15:24, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Charles Horetzky

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charles Horetzky, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 05:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Logo of the Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railway.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo of the Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railway.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:20, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:EdwardBlake.jpg

Image:EdwardBlake.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Edward Blake.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Edward Blake.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:23, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joseph Trutch.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Joseph Trutch.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kamloops1886.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Kamloops1886.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 15:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vickers 'Viking' IV flying boat G-CYEZ of the R.C.A.F., 1926.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Vickers Viking IV flying boat G-CYEZ of the RCAF1926.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Driftwood.JPG is now available as Commons:File:Driftwood Strait of Juan de Fuca.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:49, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:OrangemanThomasScott.gif

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:OrangemanThomasScott.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 555 15:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Machray jpeg

This photo: ((Robert Machray, 1908. Anglican Archbishop of Rupert's Land [[http://ww2.glenbow.org/dbtw-wpd/exec/dbtwpub.dll?AC=GET_RECORD&XC=/dbtw-wpd/exec/dbtwpub.dll&BU=http://ww2.glenbow.org/lasearch/photo.htm&TN=IMAGEBAN&SN=AUTO21635&) is not Robert Machray.

It is Samuel Prichard Matheson, who has an article on wikipedia,but no photo. I have uploaded the right photo of Robert Machray from a book I have. Since you are the one who put the picture up, maybe you can tell me how to change the name of the jpeg and get it connected to the right article. Sam is/was a relative of mine, and so his face is pretty well known in the family. I have a copper plate etching of this photo on my office wall. Interestingly enough, his first cousins, John and Edward Matheson were also Anglican priests in the west, and his nephew was the Dean of Rupertsland during his time as Bishop.

````Hugh Matheson —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugh Matheson (talk • contribs) 04:16, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Salter Adrian Hayden.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Salter Adrian Hayden.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. YUL89YYZ (talk) 12:01, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Salter Adrian Hayden.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Salter Adrian Hayden.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:39, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Sheila Finestone.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Sheila Finestone.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. YUL89YYZ (talk) 19:24, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Stanley Haidasz.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Stanley Haidasz.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. YUL89YYZ (talk) 09:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LouisRiel.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LouisRiel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Walter_Edward_Harris.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Walter_Edward_Harris.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 10:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:William_Lockhart_Gordon.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:William_Lockhart_Gordon.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 10:27, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Glenn Gould in rehearsal, Toronto, 1974.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Glenn Gould in rehearsal, Toronto, 1974.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Schipper_Painting_of_Joseph_Quesnel.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Schipper_Painting_of_Joseph_Quesnel.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Flora MacDonald.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Flora MacDonald.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 71.176.83.93 (talk) 02:35, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Test

Last Spike, Basque B.C.

Hi, the photo you posted as the driving of the last spike on the Canadian Northern Railway is in fact that of the last spike being driven on the Grand Trunk Pacific at Fraser Lake B.C. on April 7, 1914 by Edson Chamberlain. The CNoR last spike was driven by William Mackenzie "without fanfare" which leads me to believe there is no photo of the event. Lashlaroo (talk) 16:15, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lashlaroo

File:CP_4105.jpg

I have tagged File:CP_4105.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 19:33, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of List of Members of the Canadian Senate - X

I have nominated List of Members of the Canadian Senate - X, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Members of the Canadian Senate - X. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:08, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Fawcett5! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

John Robert Holmes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Allister Grosart.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Allister Grosart.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:18, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Schipper Painting of Joseph Quesnel.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Schipper Painting of Joseph Quesnel.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Nbaudin.gif

Thank you for uploading File:Nbaudin.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:20, 25 July 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:20, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:25, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Turbo Train, Montreal, 1973.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Turbo Train, Montreal, 1973.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 03:24, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:GregoryBlaxland.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:GregoryBlaxland.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Dorothy Harrison Eustis.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dorothy Harrison Eustis.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Father David Bauer.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Father David Bauer.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 17:14, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who owns the track

Please see Talk:Hull–Chelsea–Wakefield Railway#Who owns the track. Peter Horn User talk 18:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo of the Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railway.png needs authorship information.

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:Logo of the Spokane, Portland and Seattle Railway.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|Fawcett5/Archive7}} will produce an appropriate expansion,

or the {{own}} template..

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Illecillewaet.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Illecillewaet.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:35, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:7527 near snow shed.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:7527 near snow shed.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Virginia and Truckee Railroad Logo.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Virginia and Truckee Railroad Logo.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:02, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MSU Interview

Dear Fawcett5,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at [email protected] (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at [email protected]. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 23:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Donald Stoval Macdonald.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Donald Stoval Macdonald.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Toronto Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology

The article Toronto Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:35, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Lily Litvak

Hi Fawcett - thanks so much for your article on Lily Litvak. I wondered if you could inform me as to gaining copyright permission to publish the image of Lily? It is rather urgent. I am hoping to produce a production of Peter Arnott's play White Rose in which Lily of course features and need to give an image to the theatre for their brochure (deadline today!) only just found this image hence the short notice. Many thanks indeed, Ellie Zeegen Elliezeegen (talk) 11:35, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Anahareo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Anahareo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:10, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Donald Methuen Fleming.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Donald Methuen Fleming.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Robert Henry Winters.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Robert Henry Winters.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

There seem to be major problems with the items you're adding to ITN. You've included no bold links so it's entirely unclear which article, if any, supports the items. In fact the second item "Nouri al-Maliki rebuffs calls from the Obama administration to step down as Prime Minister of Iraq", doesn't seem to be supported by any of the 3 articles, so I've no idea what it's doing on ITN. Have you read Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates and Wikipedia:In the news? Nil Einne (talk) 16:33, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. I personally favour the posting of the accession of Felipe VI, but only when it's ready, which it isn't. Why have you jumped the gun? AlexTiefling (talk) 16:34, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The news articles that were there were very stale indeed, obviously nobody has been minding the shop at ITN. The links and blurbs posted are entirely uncontroversial -- bolds to articles are now included. Fawcett5 (talk) 16:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, they weren't uncontroversial. Have you read Wikipedia:In the news and Wikipedia:In the news/Administrator instructions? You appear to lack a full understanding of ITN. —David Levy 16:45, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding items willy-nilly to ITN. We have WP:ITNC for a reason. Your edits have been reverted and will continue to be reverted if you insist on continuing with your odd behaviour. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:48, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflicts) I have reverted you. Use WP:ITNC like everyone else if you have an idea for a news item. Items are only added when there is a consensus not only that the story is worthy of posting but also that the bolded article has been sufficiently updated and is in decent shape. Procedures may have been different some years ago, of course, but please follow the modern way of doing things. And saying that nobody has been minding the shop at ITN is inaccurate and also insulting to those who work hard at ITNC (I'm not one of them) to ensure that the ITN section is a net positive to the main page. Thanks, Bencherlite ^Talk 16:49, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Procedures may have been different some years ago, of course, but please follow the modern way of doing things.

Indeed, there was a time when administrators were permitted to post ITN items unilaterally. Even in those days, a bold link to an updated article was required. —David Levy 17:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, there has been considerable recent discussion of ITN's systemic bias. Putting up two stories which both frame action in the Arabic-speaking world in terms of the actions of Americans, without appropriate discussion beforehand, is especially unhelpful in that light. AlexTiefling (talk) 16:53, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, whatever, please lay off. I saw something that to me was obviously BROKEN.. the marquee story in the so-called news section is now on day five since it was actually news. So I took it upon myself in good faith to help out and fix it. I've been around here a long time, and obviously the standards for consensus on ITN have changed somewhat since I was most active, it used to be considerably more relaxed. I'll leave ITN alone from now on, but sorry, to me your process sure looks paralyzed / broken. It's not news if takes days after the event for it to show up on the feed. Besides, in at least one of the stories I posted, it looks like there is adequate consensus to post, just nobody has done anything. and sheesh, sorry I initially forgot the bolds, I had that fixed within a couple of minutes, tops. Fawcett5 (talk) 17:12, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Like you, I became a Wikipedia administrator in 2005, so I was around in the days when admins posted ITN items without prior consensus. As noted above, even then, an article update was required. ITN is not – and has never been – a news feed. I don't know what you intended to accomplish by posting information not covered in the relevant articles. (What was supposed to happen when readers followed the links?)

No one has questioned whether you acted in good faith, but competence is required. You're more than welcome to edit ITN, provided that you acquaint yourself with its purpose and procedures (including the fact that an item with "consensus to post" still requires a properly written/updated article).

You apparently were taken aback by the reactions that you received, which I suspect would have been milder if you'd taken the initial complaints seriously instead of dismissively claiming that your contested actions were "entirely uncontroversial". —David Levy 17:39, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Given your recent demonstration, perhaps you should consider re-evaluating your ability as an admin here (fewer than 250 edits in 7 years?!), especially when it comes to over-ruling processes that have been in place and running smoothly for years. As David says, your dismissive tone doesn't help you at all, I suppose we'll need to carefully monitor your behaviour and edits in due course in case you stomp on other well-established parts of Wikipedia with your "personal approach". The Rambling Man (talk) 17:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]