User talk:Fanalrino

This is Fanalrino's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fiorenzo Manganiello (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For example, a phrase like "The firm is noted for fostering innovation across industries and prioritizing sustainability" is not neutral especially as its primary citation is to the company's own website. You need independent reliable sources to back up claims like this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fiorenzo Manganiello and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 13:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fanalrino! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarcGarver (talk) 13:01, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fiorenzo Manganiello (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sentences like "The foundation collaborates with initiatives that promote technology and art for underserved communities" may be cited, but the reference source used is not neutral and the language presents an uncritical positive viewpoint that may not be balanced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fiorenzo Manganiello and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 13:04, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fiorenzo Manganiello (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frost was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the sources are trivial mentions, interviews, self-published writings, or from questionable publications. Please cite sources that satisfy the general notability guideline (WP:GNG) to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fiorenzo Manganiello and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Frost 18:04, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Fiorenzo Manganiello

Hello Fanalrino, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Fiorenzo Manganiello, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiorenzo Manganiello (2nd nomination).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Frost}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Frost 11:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Frost:Sir/maddam, you are an experienced editor and you can guide me how I can improve this article. I have considered all of the earlier inputs given by experienced editors and fixed the errors. For example, I tried to neutralized the tone of the content and made it not promotional. If it still sounds promotional, do let me know and I will fix it. Secondly, another aspect was the citation issue as previously it was discussed that these references does not qualify for notability and are trivial mentions. I have cited those references which are not trivial and third party references and mostly are news articles. I would request to guide me for making it better instead of deleting the page as this is my first page for submission. ~~~~ Fanalrino (talk) 12:34, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to WP:GNG for a glossary. If a subject isn't notable, it shouldn't have an article on Wikipedia. Frost 13:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Frost, I have checked the WP:GNG and have added those references that are not just mentioning subject's name or mere interviews. These are independent sources that have covered the subject's company and provided information about him. As a matter of fact, I have also not cited the profiles on multiple sites such as FT or others as it was mentioned in first nomination that it is of no use. I would request you to search subject's name by your own on Google and you can analyze that subject is notable. Still, if there is any improvement that can be done, do let me know so I can fix it. Thanks in advance ~~~~ Fanalrino (talk) 13:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Frost, Sir/Madam, I have cited more reliable sources in the articles. All of these are news articles about the subject and they are not merely trivial mentions but completely discussing the subject's company or his stance. I hope, it does fulfill the criteria for Notability. Also, I have improved the context of the article. I have further removed contact that you feel is bit promotional or anything like that. Your kind response will be appreciated ~~~~ Fanalrino (talk) 19:32, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fanalrino. Thank you for improving the article. The AfD discussion will run for 7 days (or more) to determine if the article is kept or deleted. When I reviewed the article, I found issues so I nominated it for deletion. I have no additional views on it. If you'd like guidance on editing Wikipedia, I recommend checking out the teahouse or Special:Homepage where you can ask your mentor questions if you have it turned on (you may turn it on by checking the box at Special:Preferences → User profile → Newcomer editor features → Display newcomer homepage). Frost 20:16, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Frost, Thank you so much Sir/Madam. Your guidance has helped me alot and I was able to improve the article. As you stated, I will wait for further 5 days and let's see how it does. I have studied all of the guidelines and then improved the article on the basis of those guidelines. I am quite hopeful that it should be kept and it will be my first keen contribution to Wikipedia community. ~~~~ Fanalrino (talk) 20:21, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Frost, Sir/Madam, I just want to request one thing that you also please provide your new input about improvement of article on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiorenzo Manganiello (2nd nomination). Your new input that it has been improved will mean alot to me and will strengthen my stance that article has been improved. Thanks in advance. ~~~~ Fanalrino (talk) 20:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fanalrino. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 15:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]