User talk:LunaEclipse
This user is busy with her education and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
This is LunaEclipse's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 2024Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
[edit]- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
DYK for Sovereign State of the Bektashi Order
[edit]On 29 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sovereign State of the Bektashi Order, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Edi Rama and Baba Mondi plan to create the smallest nation in the world? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sovereign State of the Bektashi Order. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sovereign State of the Bektashi Order), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 00:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi! Potentially setting up a new wikiproject :)
[edit]Hi! I came across your page and you seem like someone who might be interested in a wikiproject that I've been working to get set up. Specifically it'll be the Housing and Tenant Rights Wikiproject, covering tenant strikes, tenants unions, and more.
Currently me and a few others have been working within a more circumscribed focus at the New York Housing and Tenant Rights Task Force where we've been documenting the history of land ownership and tenant advocacy in the state and city. And over time that has expanded due to the linked history, so it's seems natural to create a broad umbrella group.
If interested, please add your username to sandbox/Housing and Tenant Rights, let us know about what your interests are and other details you want to include. Ill keep working on a proper wikiproject page the necessary tags, etc. in the meantime. Best regards, LoomCreek (talk) 19:16, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Da Funk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 13:22, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
The article Da Funk you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Da Funk and Talk:Da Funk/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
[edit]- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
Rent strike photos
[edit]Hey, I live near Kansas City, so I managed to get some pictures of the rent strike protests! Feel free to leave a note on my page if there's anything else tenant-related in the area that I can help expand coverage on. It was my first KC Tenants event I went to, hence the lack of photos on their page (I'm workin' on it xD). Thanks for penning the article! Catboy69 (talk) 14:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Selected Ambient Works 85–92
[edit]Hello, LunaEclipse. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Selected Ambient Works 85–92 at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC) |
- Hi LunaEclipse, I've now finished my copy-edit. I came across an oddity with the John Bush and Anthony Tognazzini reviews on Allmusic; basically, Allmusic had replaced the Bush review with the Tognazzini review at the same URL, so I had to mark the Bush review as "url-status=deviated". Also, the Tognazzini review had been defined twice so I merged the instances into a single citation. Please see my edit summaries for more details. Good luck with the article and cheers, Baffle☿gab.
...I Care Because You Do
[edit]Hello, LunaEclipse. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for ...I Care Because You Do at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC) |
Hi LunaEclipse, I've now finished my copy-edit. In "Reception", I found a repeated citation to "Select" magazine; one citation pointed to a scanned version of the magazine and the other was cited to the print version, which is fine. Leaving both citations may be confusing for readers so I merged them using "url=" to point to the scanned image and "archive-url=" to point to the Wayback archive. I also corrected some inaccurately quoted text and noted some uncited text in the section "Tracks". I wasn't expecting these kinds of errors in a current GA. I've left notes in my edit summaries. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 04:21, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
The article Da Funk you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Da Funk for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 18:02, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiCup 2024 November newsletter
[edit]The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!
The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
- Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
- Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
- MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
- Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
- BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
- Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
- Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
- BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
- Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!
If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
The page File:Tyler, the Creator - Earfquake.mp3 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image was an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links were updated.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 17:36, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Tyler, the Creator - Earfquake.ogg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Tyler, the Creator - Earfquake.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 00:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Aphex Twin - Avril 14th.mp3
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:Aphex Twin - Avril 14th.mp3. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 00:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
[edit]- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?