Jump to content

User talk:Dave Eggersly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


November 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sue Rangell[citation needed] 03:02, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Prostate massage. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jschnur (talk) 03:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] 

I know lots about anal eroticism so want to help. Dave Eggersly (talk) 03:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dave Eggersly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

"please let me edit. i didnt realize I was acting against the rules and want to be able to help. i will read the rules before carrying on and makr sure my edits have good sourced. I didnt vandalize on purpose. thank you. Dave Dave Eggersly (talk) 16:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)"[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
     • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), place at the end of the prose you copied this template {{reflist-talk}} and then save.
  • Now, edit that content to propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'd like to see an explanation for edits like this and this broke multiple references. --jpgordon::==( o ) 20:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dave Eggersly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the policies and added some information about Colchester Castle. I am being careful that the references are good Dave Eggersly (talk) 11:49 am, Today (UTC 0)

Decline reason:

"Significant and well-researched improvements" does not mean "a slight change to a reference's refname tag and a couple of (unsourced) statements about minor aspects of architecture." Please demonstrate that you are aboe to contribute constructively by making some actual improvements to your copy of the article. We are not looking for minor fomatting changes - you might, for example, locate and add some new sources for unsourced statements, or research and write a couple of additional paragraphs on the castle's architure or history. This is not enough. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:23, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You consider those to be significant edits? I also see that you have yet to respond to Jpgordon's question just above the unblock request (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:18, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
i dont know how I did that. I must have pressed the wrong button or done some thing wrong but I didnt do it on purpose. thats why i said i'll be more careful. I tried added good content and will hope to do more. I am not an expert editor (yet!) but I am not trying to vandalize. Dave Eggersly (talk) 12:24, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dave Eggersly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yunshui, I made more edits than those in your link. Compare to the actual article, not to the change I made on my talk. Dave Eggersly (talk) 14:19, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have basically been given homework - but you're refusing to do it. Please do not submit an unblock request until you have performed SIGNIFICANT edits to the article, and have followed the instructions properly. The next unblock attempt will be your final try, so please spend a few days (and I do mean DAYS) actually improving a draft article - not minor cosmetic copyright violations (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:02, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You didn't follow the instructions and save the page without making any changes, as per the highlighted text in Beeblebrox's template above? You realise that makes it rather more difficult for us to check your edits, right? Having compared the section below with the corresponding section at Colchester Castle, I can see that you have indeed made some changes in the process of copying it across - primarily, these appear to be copyright violations (close paraphrases) of the source you've used, which, incidentally, you have also cited incorrectly (you need to list the full URL in a citation template). Yunshui 雲‍水 14:52, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Colchester castle - my edits

[edit]

Later history

[edit]

In 1215, English Barons, dissatisfied with King John's severe taxation regime, rebelled and aided by King Philippe II of France, captured the castle. It was later recaptured by King John in the the altercations with the nobles that eventually led to the Magna Carta. Since then, it remained Crown property until the 17th century. [1]

During the 13th century the castle was increasingly used as a jail, and in 1350 after the castle ceased to serve any milatary function, the dungeons were converted into prison cells.[1]

Colchester Castle, rear from NW

The castle has had various uses since it ceased to be a royal castle. It has been a county prison, where in 1645 the self-styled Witchfinder General, Matthew Hopkins interrogated and imprisoned suspected witches.

In 1648, during the Second English Civil War, the Royalist leaders Sir Charles Lucas and Sir George Lisle captured the town and the castle, designating it as a Royalist stronghold. It was seized by the Parliamentarians after a 12 week siege and Lucas and Lisle were executed behind the castle.[1] Local legend has it that grass will not grow on the spot on which they fell. A small obelisk now marks the point. In 1656 the Quaker James Parnell was martyred there.

In 1650 a Parliament Survey condemned the building and valued the stone at five pounds, the roof over the Great Hall having collapsed in 1837.[2][1] In 1683 an ironmonger, John Wheely, was licensed to pull it all down - presumably to use as building material in the town. After "great devastations" in which much of the upper structure was demolished using screws and gunpowder, and the foundations of the Roman Temple were discovered, he gave up when the operation became unprofitable.[3]

In 1727 the castle was bought by Mary Webster for her daughter Sarah, who was married to Charles Gray, the Member of Parliament for Colchester. To begin with, Gray leased out the keep to a local grain merchant and the east side was leased out to the county as a gaol. In the late 1740s Gray began a programme of restoration to the South facade and tower. He created a private park around the ruin and his summer house (perched on the old Norman castle earthworks, in the shape of a Roman temple) can still be seen. Charles Gray also added a red tiled roof, a library and a study.

Twentieth and twenty-first centuries

[edit]

In 1860, the castle was opened to the public. In 1922, the castle and the surrounding park were given to the town and they have remained as the Upper and Lower Castle Parks ever since. A new roof was constructed for the keep during the 1930's.[1] The castle is now a Grade I listed building and a public museum.

  1. ^ a b c d e Eleptico, Philippa. [/index.php?pageId=ColchesterCastle_History "Colchester Castle"]. British Castle. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  2. ^ ERO T?P 64/25
  3. ^ Wheeler 1920, p. 87.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dave_Eggersly&oldid=1083927686"