User talk:SounderBruce

Please keep discussion of specific article issues on their respective talk page instead of dispersing the discussion; any additions here will be reverted and ignored. If there's something else you'd like to say, feel free to message me. I may or may not be able to respond in a timely manner.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This is SounderBruce's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45: 31 days

Category:Sound Transit logos has been nominated for merging

Category:Sound Transit logos has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome SounderBruce! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 13:10, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2024 November newsletter

The 2024 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round being a very tight race. Our new champion is AirshipJungleman29 (submissions), who scored 2,283 points mainly through 3 high-multiplier FAs and 3 GAs on military history topics. By a 1% margin, Airship beat out last year's champion, BeanieFan11 (submissions), who scored second with 2,264 points, mainly from an impressive 58 GAs about athletes. In third place, Generalissima (submissions) scored 1,528 points, primarily from two FAs on U.S. Librarians of Congress and 20 GAs about various historical topics. Our other finalists are: Sammi Brie (submissions) with 879 points, Hey man im josh (submissions) with 533 points, BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 432 points, Arconning (submissions) with 244 points, and AryKun (submissions) with 15 points. Congratulations to our finalists and all who participated!

The final round was very productive, and contestants had 7 FAs, 9 FLs, 94 GAs, 73 FAC reviews, and 79 GAN reviews and peer reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Generalissima (submissions) wins the featured article prize for 3 FAs in round 4, and 7 FAs overall.
Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured list prize for 23 FLs overall.
MaranoFan (submissions) wins the featured topic prize for 9 articles in featured topics in round 1.
Hey man im josh (submissions) wins the featured content reviewer prize for 110 FA/FL reviews overall.
BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the good article prize for 58 GAs in round 5, and 70 GAs overall.
Fritzmann (submissions) wins the good topic prize for 6 articles in good topics in round 2.
Sammi Brie (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize for 45 GA reviews in round 2, and 78 GA reviews overall.
BeanieFan11 (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 131 Did you know articles overall.
Muboshgu (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 15 In the news articles in round 1, and 36 overall.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2025 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement!

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Seattle Center

Clearly we see this differently. Can you provide some examples where e.g. Seattle Times calls the entire complex "The Seattle Center"? We're not talking about uses like, "The Seattle Center fountain" or "The Seattle Center Armory building" or "The Seattle Center Foundation. Speaking of which, please find an example of your usage anywhere on https://seattlecenter.org/ Thanks. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 01:42, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdsds: From The Seattle Times: This recent article heavily uses it, in reference to the whole complex, in addition to this 2008 article and this profile. The use on the official/promotional website does not factor into the Manual of Style, per examples at MOS:BRAND.

I should also mention that the city council uses both forms [INDX& in legislation], but "the Seattle Center" seems to have a greater number of hits. Sounder Bruce 01:50, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding those. WP:DUE seems to apply, as there are multiple opinions on which is the preferred usage. Of course that flies in the face of consistency. Perhaps the article would benefit from a short section on the multiple ways used to refer to the site. (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 01:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sdsds: Unless a reliable source has significant coverage of the difference, it does not belong in the article. We just have to choose a rule that best fits the MOS and consensus and keep it standardized across all mention of the Seattle Center and its component buildings. Sounder Bruce 04:17, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And are you willing to apply that same logic to the Central Park article? Rockefeller Center? New York Penn Station? Yellowstone National Park? Trafalgar Square? (— 𝐬𝐝𝐒𝐝𝐬 — - talk) 06:04, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Collab Idea

Hi SounderBruce! Hope everything is going well. I was wondering if you would be interested in a collaboration? I am pretty close to getting Packers-Seahawks rivalry to WP:GAN. I have also been working on some of the more famous games between the two. I was wondering if you would be interested in a long-term collab to create a Packers–Seahawks rivalry Good Topic? No worries if you aren't interested or have other priorities. As the resident Seattle-sports person, I figured I would ask! I am going to try to finish up Packers-Seahawks rivalry, then work on the two other missing games. Tackling Fail Mary last (I always feel like it is harder to rewrite an article compared to writing from scratch). Then it would leave the two team articles (which will be hard). I would be up for putting in the effort for Green Bay Packers but doubt I would be able to do Seattle Seahawks. Let me know what you think, and again, no big deal either way! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonzo fan2007: Sounds like an interesting project! I'm not that well-versed in NFL lore, so I'll leave the game articles to you, but I certainly could try to tackle the main Seahawks article once my schedule is cleared up and other high-priority stuff is out of the way. Sports-wise, I still need to finish up my MLS Cup topic and figure out how to close out the Seattle sports season series I've been working on for just over a year. Sounder Bruce 22:54, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. I'll be working on the game articles for a bit. Let me know when you are ready to attack Seattle Seahawks and then maybe we can develop some type of common layout for that one and Green Bay Packers. Nice work so far on MLS and the Seattle sports season series! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:53, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy (Belated) First Edit Day!

P.S. I am so sorry for the lateness. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

Thank you today for MLS Cup 1999, introced (in 2022): "Amid another wild Major League Soccer playoffs, I think it's fitting to write about the league's first cup rematch. The Los Angeles Galaxy and D.C. United played each other three years earlier. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:12, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]