User talk:Ccbls001

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:34, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

lol when was I ever disruptive editing Ccbls001 (talk) 15:35, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you make further attempts to add Eddy Chen to the absolute pitch article, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:36, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

you hate the guy that much? he used to be on the wikipedia page lmfao Ccbls001 (talk) 15:38, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism attempts after warning

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:39, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how is adding a notable person to the list abusing the system lmao Ccbls001 (talk) 15:44, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Stop adding unsourced content to Wikipedia. If you need help with this, read WP:REFB.

Please pay attention to these warnings. Your talk page comments thus far suggest you need to rethink how you approach Wikipedia or you're going to find your account blocked again. Sergecross73 msg me 22:35, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Joey Jordison, you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 09:31, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Anne Heche. Thank you. AdrianHObradors (talk) 14:31, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, PinkNews, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dylan Mulvaney. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Beccaynr (talk) 18:32, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 19:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]