User talk:Bvwdi
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Genocide of indigenous people, you may be blocked from editing.
August 2024
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you are repeatedly making changes to Ainu people, but your edit summaries have been misleading. You have written "definition" each time, but you are not changing any definitions. "Hokkaidō and the Tōhoku region [of Honshu]" makes sense, but "Hokkaidō and Tōhoku region" cannot be understood well by English-language readers because of the missing "the" and a lack of common knowledge about the location of Tōhoku. In addition, you have readded changes to this area of the page four times in a row without participating in discussion. I have noted the edit summary problem and the problem with English syntax, so please explain why you are making these changes.
Your recent editing history at Ainu people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dekimasuよ! 20:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Mainland Japan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 15:34, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Empire of Japan. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 16:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
November 2024
[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Hokkaido dialects, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 17:23, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi Bvwdi! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Mainland Japan that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 17:24, 17 November 2024 (UTC)