User talk:Arsi Warrior
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on SoGamed, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because SoGamed is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting SoGamed, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:EF7 Engine Cylinder head 1.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:EF7 Engine Cylinder head 1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:10, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of CNG direct injection
[edit]You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
A tag has been placed on CNG direct injection, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article that does not provide sufficient context to identify its subject. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hang on}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Beagel (talk) 15:21, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Soren ELX 1.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Soren ELX 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk|contribs) 20:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi!
This issue is now solved. I have replied you on your Commons user page. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List of universities in Isfahan Province
[edit]Hello Arsi Warrior,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of universities in Isfahan Province for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, YuMaNuMa Contrib 09:02, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Do not revert, especially when you give no reason. There is a reason we use infoboxes. Plus, programming elements are not allowed and html tables should not be used. Use wiki format for tables. We use wiki code so people do not have to learn html. Bgwhite (talk) 16:50, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't want to revert your edit to the previous, full of complexity, one. The problem is that I want to use different labels to give as much information as possible to quick-viewers, but I am not able to do that ; for example the label "Research Expenditures" and some more labels. Do you have any idea for this issue?
- Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsi Warrior (talk • contribs) 16:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not every bit of information needs to be in an infobox and usually only the base facts. "Affiliations" is what sport conferences the school belongs to. "Living alumni" is a very big approximation and big approximations shouldn't be used in an infobox. "Research Expenditures" is usually a made up number... In most schools, when a research grant comes in, a percentage of it goes to the university. It is usually around 50%. Some schools include that in expenditures and other don't.
- "Nobel Laureates" and "U.S. News" can be very useful information. Maybe put it in the lead section? Infoboxes are used by search engines (Google uses Infobox person extensively) and data mining programs (DBpedia and Wikidata are examples). So by not using an infobox, you also loose out on exposure in other places.
- Make sure you sign your posts with ~~~~ Bgwhite (talk) 17:36, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
The article Barbara and Jack Davis Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- no indication of importance for this building
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Bit Torrent article
[edit]The author of Bit Torrent is already listed in the second paragraph of the article. His name does not need to be listed in the first two paragraphs. His college is irrelevant to the article itself unless it involved the university (like [Google]). Caidh (talk) 19:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- The only reason the college is relevant because of Google is because Google was developed by Brin & Page AT Stanford. They didn't just happen to be students there. It is not relevant otherwise. It is more than relevant to the article on Cohen, not the Bit Torrent article (unless you can find some involvement that Buffalo had in Bit Torrent's development.Caidh (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Arsi Warrior. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Arsi Warrior. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joshua Tenenbaum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MacArthur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 28 September 2019 (UTC)