User talk:Arijit8788

March 2018

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sonu Nigam, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 03:54, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hrithik Roshan. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 15:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shoaib Malik, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 15:22, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Shellwood. Shellwood (talk) 18:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Race 3. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Aggarwala2727 (talk) 05:59, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Race 3, you may be blocked from editing. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 06:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Aggarwala2727 (talk) 06:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Disha Patani, you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: [1] There is apparently an inconsistency about Disha Patani's birthdate, such that multiple sources have commented on the discrepancy between an earlier reported age, and her new reported age. Deleting this sourced information is not constructive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:45, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Sara Ali Khan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Geniac (talk) 03:19, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sara Ali Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please stop changing well-sourced information. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

Please stop your disruptive editing as you did to the page Hardik Pandya. BhuvaneshwarBam (talk) 10:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pakistan national cricket team, you may be blocked from editing. David Biddulph (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ML^talk 14:15, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. El_C 04:10, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have reference bitch!

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. El_C 04:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for disruption, failure to cite sources and personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 04:17, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bijapur

Hi! I saw that you updated the rainfall for Bijapur. When looking, it seems that someone stuffed up and put a reference that links to New York for the rainfall data (not you - it has been there for a while). I'd like to fix that. Can you let me know where you got that data from so I can update the reference? Thanks! - Bilby (talk) 02:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:19, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

STFU

Get the fuck out of here. Just fuck off . Don't lecture me Arijit8788 (talk) 19:34, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]