User talk:Ajdebre

Copyright block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to quote non-free text. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Theleftorium ^(talk) 11:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After taking a look at the history of your talk page, I found even more warnings, dating back to as far as March 2006. See for example [1] and [2]. I have therefore extended your block to indefinite. You are still allowed the contest the block at any time. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:16, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajdebre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand my errors, the copyright violations are just unproffesional mistakes, in the past it has happened that i copy-paste material that i was thinking to edit right away but ending in a saved page (I know, dumb), and most of the images are fair-use material that i should've put effort in right away, however these errors have mostly been made in the past (before i was an active editor) and my wish is not to contribute negative material, not on my behalf nor wikipedia's, if you give me time i will process my errors.

Decline reason:

In view of your four-year-long history of ignoring copyright warnings, I am unconvinced that you suddenly understand and will abide by our copyright rules. Sandstein 16:20, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Vojvoda Bogut i Djurdje Bogutovic

Pozdrav. Interesuje me gdje si pronasao podatke o Vojvodi Bogutu i Djurdju Bogutovicu? Ja sam inace autor teksta o Jablangradu na srpskoj wikipediji.--TheMiner (talk) 13:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No

Ajdebre, this is awful to see. I didn't saw this with copyright problems. Your hundreds of articles are invaluable contribution to wikipedia. I hope that this will not be indef. --Tadija^speaks 20:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, he was already given an indefinite block after the admin realised he had prior accusations of copyright violations. Shame though, the loss of another key editor to Wikipedia. Yet, I am truly surprised no one has figured out that Ajdebre is using sockpuppets, or at least had used them till a few days ago. --Kilibarda (talk) 15:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia

Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 17:09, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Kale-rezervoar-za-vodu.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kale-rezervoar-za-vodu.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 19:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Serbia 2

Template:Serbia 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 22:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2008 Čačak earthquake for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2008 Čačak earthquake is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008 Čačak earthquake until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 17:20, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Srbac BiH.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Srbac BiH.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 14:02, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Serbian historical regions

Template:Serbian historical regions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 21:17, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ivan Desnica

The article Ivan Desnica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't verify person's existence via Google search, books, scholar

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:56, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Serbs in Bulgaria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serbs in Bulgaria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbs in Bulgaria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kostja (talk) 10:50, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ma ajde bre, you are invited!

You're invited to be a part of Wikipedia:WikiProject University of Belgrade, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the University of Belgrade. To accept this invitation, click here! Articles related to other universities in Belgrade, Serbia and Southeast Europe may be discussed as well. This helps share information and foster knowledge about higher education in the region.

Nomination of Independent Kosovo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Independent Kosovo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Kosovo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 19:37, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Independent Kosovo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Independent Kosovo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Kosovo (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 19:53, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Slavic deity

Template:Infobox Slavic deity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Slavic deity

Template:Infobox Slavic deity has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 04:45, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pljeskavica

The article Pljeskavica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sadly, this article does not cite any references, and so clearly fails WP:GNG requirement.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:43, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jokino Vrelo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jokino Vrelo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Epeefleche (talk) 05:43, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Syrianization

The article Syrianization has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No content or sources in almost a decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vrhnje listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vrhnje. Since you had some involvement with the Vrhnje redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 06:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:National Tourism Organization of Serbia (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:National Tourism Organization of Serbia (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jugoslovenima for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jugoslovenima is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jugoslovenima until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina, Ajdebre!

Wikipedia editor Krishna Chaitanya Velaga just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The article will be considered for deletion.

To reply, leave a comment on Krishna Chaitanya Velaga's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:08, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of the Republic of Serbian Krajina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Serbian titles has been nominated for discussion

Category:Serbian titles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 01:34, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Grb Crnojev.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Grb Crnojev.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:57, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Organ theft in Kosovo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Organ theft in Kosovo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organ theft in Kosovo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Openlydialectic (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Serbian Wars

Template:Serbian Wars has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:06, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Regions of Republika Srpska

Template:Regions of Republika Srpska has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Valjevoloc.png

The file File:Valjevoloc.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natali Thanou for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natali Thanou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natali Thanou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:51, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Serbian flag takovo.png

The file File:Serbian flag takovo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Svevlad" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Svevlad. Since you had some involvement with the Svevlad redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 00:34, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Kostolac culture" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kostolac culture. Since you had some involvement with the Kostolac culture redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. - speednat (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natali Thanou for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natali Thanou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natali Thanou (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 13:59, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Welcome to RS.jpg

The file File:Welcome to RS.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 08:08, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Serbian architecture outside Serbia

A tag has been placed on Category:Serbian architecture outside Serbia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:13, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2022_September_16#Architecture_by_country. – Fayenatic London 14:32, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Serbo-Croatian Friendship

The article Serbo-Croatian Friendship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unuseful disambiguation page, neither targets are/were ever referred to using this term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Metropolitan areas of Serbia has been nominated for merging

Category:Metropolitan areas of Serbia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 06:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]