User talk:Adsx27
January 2011
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Publitas, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 14:58, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
The article Publitas is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Publitas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dqfn13 (talk) 15:03, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Advise
[edit]User Adsx27 is Dutch so I'll write him/her in Dutch: Gebruik ook hier het advies dat ik je op de Nederlandstalige wiki heb gegeven. Ook hier is de nominatie niet persoonlijk bedoeld. Ik kijk zo objectief mogelijk naar het artikel. Gebruik bronnen, liefst niet van Publitas zelf, succes! Dqfn13 (talk) 15:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
(Use my advise I've given you on the Dutch wiki. This nominatition too is not meant to be personal . I'm only trying to be as objective as possible about the article. Use sources other Publitas self, good luck! Dqfn13 (talk) 15:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC))
- Please have a look at a similar company's Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texterity. They have zero citations/references, yet their article is apparently perfect. I don't understand why this page (with a lot less text than theirs) is inappropriate without references. Furthermore, I don't know any sources that I could use for the English article as references. Unfortunately for this reason, I won't be able to add anything. Any further suggestions?Adsx27 (talk) 15:21, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Check the logs Adsx27, both on the Dutch and the English wikipedia there are more voices saying delete this article then to keep it. I'd like to keep it, but make it les advertisment and more article! Dqfn13 (talk) 22:16, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- Please have a look at a similar company's Wikipedia page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texterity. They have zero citations/references, yet their article is apparently perfect. I don't understand why this page (with a lot less text than theirs) is inappropriate without references. Furthermore, I don't know any sources that I could use for the English article as references. Unfortunately for this reason, I won't be able to add anything. Any further suggestions?Adsx27 (talk) 15:21, 15 January 2011 (UTC)