Jump to content

User talk:198.160.139.1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Pre-Paid Legal Services has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 23:41, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Soap— 16:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to William Brandon (Marshal of Marshalsea), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ubeki-beki-beki-beki-stan-stan. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! hewhoamareismyself 21:16, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Christianity and violence, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


Latter Day Saints

[edit]

Recent edits to the Eucharist article labeled Mormonism as a Cult. While I share this conviction, it is not an appropriate thing to post in an encyclopedia article. ReformedArsenal (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Willingen

[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to the Willingen article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. Thank you! Epicgenius (talk) 19:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Florida Southern College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2016

[edit]

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Tiana Lynn, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 04:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, 198.160.139.1. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Asbury Theological Seminary, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Stop icon Please read the above warning and STOP editing the Asbury Theological Seminary article - especially as your edits are contrary to our editing guidelines on WP:External links as well as your conflict of interest - Arjayay (talk) 19:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

[edit]

Stop icon Please read the above warnings and STOP editing the Asbury Theological Seminary article - especially as your edits are contrary to our editing guidelines as well as your conflict of interest - Arjayay (talk) 11:22, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Red Jay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to East–West Schism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Red Jay (talk) 17:35, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Asbury Theological Seminary— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 18:47, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, History of American wine, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:14, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:198.160.139.1&oldid=1256841534"