User:Sagredo/graphics

Lately most all my wiki-time is spent at the Wikipedia graphics lab. It's a place where needed images are created, and images that editors think can be improved are improved.

I have no training as an artist, but I have done a considerable amount of photography and have spent quite some time fiddling with Photoshop, and some with Inkscape. If you're patient, I can usually obtain pleasing results. (You're welcome to make a comment here, but I reserve the right to edit.)

I'm a Wikigraphist of the Graphic Lab, from which you can request image improvement.

Done Scouting Barnstar

-for excellent support of Scouting project through improving its images. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Done Hadrians Wall

How did you do that? --Malachirality (talk) 07:40, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

The only real limits are those of time and imagination. This is somewhat more rebuilding than is normally allowed for an encyclopedic image, and the edited image has not been used. -S

Done Drawn from scratch

Coat of arms of Indonesia
Coptic Cross
(on 1000 pages)
University of Oklahoma

They look great. Thanks very much.↔NMajdan•talk 17:22, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, Great job. Gopher Backer
illustration of prosthaphaeretic slide rule[1]
Thank you.
Very slick illustration

Done Oran Province, Algeria

Clickable SVG completely from from scratch - each division can be easily changed to any color, the borders can be changed easily in both width and color.

Thank you! It's fantastic. It will be used on all articles of Category:Oran Province. --escondites 09:01, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Done Hoysala architecture

Article(s): Hoysala architecture, Today's feature article.

Request: -- Several of the images from today's feature article have ugly red text on them placed by the camera used to photograph them. I am requesting for it to be removed. aliasd·U·T 08:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

This is very good work. Pity about the (page) protection, I suppose something could have been done though :( Its all clear now as far as I can see... Thanks for all the help Sagredo, your work is great. aliasd·U·T 08:21, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Done Geography of India

Label Mountains and Rivers

WOW! Great job!!!! Thanks sooo much Nikkul (talk) 16:42, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Good work. please correct a couple of mistakes to make it great. Mistake 1. There is only one river Tapti - which is just south of the river Narmada. These are the only two rivers which flow from east to west. The river south of the river Godavari is also identified as Tapti. But it is the river Krishna. River Krishna is the thrid major river in current India after ganga, and godavari. Mistake 2. The spelling of river Mahanadi (in smaskrutam, maha means great and nadi means river) is written as Manahadi which is meaningless. Best Regards Telugujoshi (talk)

Anybody looking at this page? Please let me know how to correct the map as per the two suggestions given above. Thanks. Telugujoshi (talk)

Done Now you see it, . . .

Thank you, you rock! Chris (talk)
Looks great! Thanks, Jeff Dahl (Talk)
The image looks great.
Thanks!↔NMajdan•talk

Done Aries (astrology)

That's amazing - you rule! Benjiboi 21:45, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

That's an exceptionally illustrative image. 68.39.174.238 (talk) 22:17, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Done George Thomas Coker

Original [2]

Wow, Sagredo, I'm impressed! That is much prettier than my version. --Slashme (talk) 08:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

You guys are amazing, thank you both! Merry Christmas! Chris (クリス) (talk) 11:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

Done Berkshire WikiProject Logo

I didn't create this, but simply found the bug that eluded its creator.[3] It appears on over 180 pages.-S

Sagredo, you are an absolute legend, that's perfect! Seaserpent⁸⁵ 14:05, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello, just a note that I absolutely love this image! Of course it's inspired by simillar work I produced for the Greater Manchester WikiProject, but I feel most pleased and encouraged that this style of work has caught on! Great stuff indeed! Keep it up, -- Jza84 · (talk) 23:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

I still like it, so there's no blame here! Thanks for the clarification though, and thanks (none-the-less) for getting it working! -- Jza84 · (talk) 00:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)