User:RichsLaw/Coverage of contract law

User page Talk page Contract law Tort law Sandbox Sandbox 2 Sandbox 3

This page lists the deficiencies in the coverage of English contract law on Wikipedia, generally noting missing areas in core articles, and missing/inadequate cases. Incomplete.

Topic area	Main article assessment	Coverage of cases
Agreement in English law	Start	Good
Consideration in English law	B	Good
Estoppel in English law	B	Good
Creating legal relations in English law	?	Poor
Certainty in English contract law	Stub	Poor
Privity in English law	B	Good
Contractual terms in English law	?	Good
Incorporation of terms in English law	?	Good
Interpreting contracts in English law	?	OK
Implied terms in English law	Start	Poor
Unfair contract terms in English law	Not started	Poor
Specific performance	No English article	Poor
Capacity in English law	C	Poor
Iniquitous pressure in English law	?	Poor-OK
Misrepresentation in English law	Start	OK
Mistake in English law	Start	Good
Frustration in English law	B	Good

Overview of specific areas

Definition of a contract:
Not yet started.

History of English contract law:
Not yet started.

English contract law theory:
Not yet started.

Agreement:
Agreement in English law - most of the page not done

Consideration:
Consideration in English law - parts not adequately sourced, sections on third party obligations and forbearance to sue not complete

Intention to create legal relations:

Certainty and completeness:
Certainty in English contract law - barely started

Capacity:
Capacity in English law - could add tortious liability of minors, information on ratification

Nash v Inman

Specific performance:
Main article not written

Misrepresentation:
Misrepresentation in English law - very incomplete, but general misrepresentation article seems to have a lot of the content it'd need

Misrepresentations Act 1967

Mistake:
Mistake in English law - lacking in most areas

Ingram v Little

Frustration:
Frustration in English law - add a delay section to frustrating events