Jump to content

User:Beyond My Ken/Clearing the decks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I was curious about how often I cleared my talk page, and how loaded it was at the time:

  • 26 January 2024 - 63,449
  • 11 June 2023 - 23,771
  • 24 April 2023 - 34,725
  • 7 February 2023 - 41,091
  • 19 November 2022 - 68,801
  • 4 February 2022 - 41,605
  • 15 August 2021 - 11,768
  • 4 July 2021 - 31,901
  • 21 May 2021 - 27, 207
  • 28 April 2021 - 29,841
  • 24 March 2021 - 6,253‎) 114,578 (obviously should have waited a day or so)
  • 22 March 2021 - 108,325)
  • 1 February 2021 - 53,889
  • 5 December 2020 - 60,650
  • 28 July 2020 - 184,043‎
  • 20 May 2020 - 61,323‎
  • 19 February 2020 - 50,559‎
  • 28 September 2019 - 63,853
  • 27 August 2019 - 69,342
  • 19 July 2019 - 78,971
  • 7 March 2019 - 17,709
  • 23 February 2019 - 70,891
  • 17 December 2018 - 92,038
  • 23 September 2018 - 133,097
  • 19 June 2018 - 124,501
  • 2 April 2018 - 50,114
  • 17 February 2018 - 168,257
  • 16 November 2017 - 66,994
  • 31 August 2017 - 31,308
  • 22 August 2017 - 102,874
  • 28 March 2017 - 19,935
  • 13 March 2017 - 73,544
  • 18 January 2017 - 78,190
  • 11 August 2016 - 82,883
  • 12 June 2016 - 49,384
  • 2 May 2016 - 57,596
  • 28 March 2016 - 56,340
  • 14 February 2016 - 58,972
  • 2 January 2016 - 69,464
  • 25 November 2015 - 55,440
  • 20 October 2015 - 74,387
  • 15 September 2015 - 86,528
  • 27 July 2015 - 46,346
  • 26 June 2015 - 84,314
  • 2 May 2015 - 43,434
  • 17 April 2015 - 83,588
  • 27 February 2015 - 69,728
  • 3 January 2015 - 46,136
  • 22 October 2014 - 80,933
  • 1 July 2014 - 123,308
  • 14 May 2014 - 89,932
  • 6 April 2014 - 78,561
  • 27 January 2014 - 7,743 1,902 = 9,645
  • 24 January 2014 - 18,970
  • 22 January 2014 - 47,015
  • 5 January 2014 - 83,241
  • 24 November 2013 - 103,300
  • 8 October 2013 - 67,172
  • 4 August 2013 - 130,816
  • 9 April 2013 - 28,857
  • 28 March 2103 - 84,116
  • 23 January 2013 - 77,829
  • 27 December 2012 - 63,706
  • 26 November 2012 - 103,315
  • 13 September 2012 - 74,387
  • 2 August 2012 - 35,682
  • 19 June 2012 - 51,807
  • 3 May 2012 - 90,252
  • 30 January 2012 - 61,123
  • 3 January 2012 - 28,801
  • 9 December 2011 - 21,382
  • 13 November 2011 - 43,641
  • 29 September 2011 - 21,282
  • 7 September 2011 - 42,600
  • 4 August 2011 - 39,240
  • 17 June 2011 - 42,535
  • 7 May 2011 - 23,871
  • 23 April 2011 - 54,178
  • 22 February 2011 - 51,896
  • 25 January 2011 - 56,389
  • 18 December 2010 - 27,713
  • 9 November 2010 - 40,507
  • 29 October 2010 - 34,518
  • 12 October 2010 - 6,859
  • 11 October 2010 - 10,458
  • 4 October 2010 - 16,465
  • 23 September 2010 - 42,484
  • 6 August 2010 - 16,576
  • 4 August 2010 - 15,060
  • 26 July 2010 - 24,629
  • 4 July 2010 - 37,393
  • 16 June 2010 - 12,062
  • 30 May 2010 - 16,821
  • 13 May 2010 - 31,119
  • 31 March 2010 - 35,987
  • 14 March 2010 - 63,137

_________________________________

If you came here to complain about a revert I made to an edit of yours, and I did not provide an edit summary, please assume that the edit summary would have been "Not an improvement" or "Better before."

If I thought your edit was vandalism, I would not have used "Undo", I would have used "Rollback".

If I reverted your edit, and asked you to discuss it on the article talk page, please initiate the discussion there, so that all interested editors can participate. This user page is not the appropriate place for such discussions to take place.

Of course, if you came to have a quick word about something I screwed up, or just to check in or chat, this is the place!

Thanks, BMK


Salus populi suprema lex esto.

(Cicero: De Legibus)

"The health of the people should be the highest law."

We're here to build an encyclopedia. Anything which helps us do that is useful, and anything which gets in the way of that is counter-productive.

Every decision made at every level on Wikipedia should reflect this basic truth.

(On Wikipedia, the health of the encyclopedia should be the highest law.)

BMK is attempting to hold himself to a 2RR limit. Please contact him if you see him going past that.

There is community consensus for the following pledges made by Beyond My Ken:

  • BMK will put all article images within the section they relate to whenever and wherever possible.
  • When another editor disputes BMK's judgement whether it is or isn't possible to put an image inside the relevant section, he will defer to their decision.

Beyond My Ken has also agreed that failure to stick to the above pledges may be enforced by blocks.


It is The Reader that we should consider on each and every edit we make to Wikipedia.
(Thanks to Alan Liefting)
June 26, 2015

If I left you a message, please answer on your talk page, as I will be watching it.

If you leave me a message, I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.


Please click here to leave me a new message.

________________________________

Talk page header

It is The Reader that we should consider on each and every edit we make to Wikipedia.
(Thanks to Alan Liefting)

When determining what course of action should be taken about a disruptive, tendentious or bothersome editor, the primary concern – more important than precedents, consistency, fairness or even AGF – is which option will best serve the building of an encyclopedia.

Beyond My Ken

"[Internet trolls] are characterized by personality traits that fall in the so-called Dark Tetrad: Machiavellianism (willingness to manipulate and deceive others), narcissism (egotism and self-obsession), psychopathy (the lack of remorse and empathy), and sadism (pleasure in the suffering of others)."

We all tend to take Wikipedia much too seriously. It's certainly important to provide a free first-class online encyclopedia for the public, and no one can dispute how central Wikipedia has become to people searching for accurate, unbiased information, but there's little excuse for the bitterness, in-fighting and bitchiness with which many people approach editing here, which makes the experience difficult and unpleasant at times. I am generally in favor of removing the worst of those transgressors permanently, which, of course, leaves me open to the charge of not assuming good faith. Actually, I have little trouble assuming good faith, I simply refuse to keep the assumption alive in the face of evidence of misbehavior.

Beyond My Ken

"Beware of the 'innocent' man who plays his part too well."

Old theatrical proverb
(made up by me)

"Having an open mind doesn't mean you have to let your brains fall out."

"A sense of humor is just common sense, dancing."

William James (attributed)

"He used . . . sarcasm.
Oh, he knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and satire."

"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof
is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."

Wikipedia is a project to create and improve an online encyclopedia which is as accurate and as useful to its readers as possible. It is not an MMORPG, a debating society or an experiment to create the ideal online community. Activities which do not, in some direct or closely indirect way, contribute to that goal are a waste of the project's resources and should be minimized as much as possible.

Beyond My Ken

- Learn the lesson that collectively, Wikipedia doesn't want to be saved, it's not even very concerned about being fixed. It is quite happy being what it is, flawed or not.
- Most importantly: Stay uninvolved, learn not to care.

Waiting for "R" to arrive...
Even the worst broken clock
is right twice a day

PUBLIC NOTICE

Wikipedian looking for new members for activist left-wing cabal to keep Wikipedia Marxist-Leninist-Maoist and pure. No one to the right of Trotsky need apply. Send writing samples and pre-signed blank confessions to:
Wikipedia Spartacus League
Democrat Party Headquarters Building
Ché Guerva Suite
1917 Hillary Clinton Hero of the Great October Socialist Revolution Drive
Pyongyang,
Democratic People's Republic of Massachusetts
Att: Beyond My Commie
Become a charter member of
THE INTERNATIONAL
BEYOND MY KEN
APOLOGISTS CLUB
and get a subscription to Apologia Today magazine, plus a free secret decoder ring!!
  FUN!   LIES!   CRUDITY!   DISRUPTION!
Bad pennies always turn up.
...but wait, "R" is busy! Could he be blogging? Good work, "R"!

If I left you a message, please answer on your talk page, as I will be watching it.

If you leave me a message, I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.


My notifications are turned off, so "pinging" me will not get my attention.


Please note that the title of any comment posted here may be altered at my discretion. One thing you can do to prevent this from happening is to make your comment titles short and succinct. Comments themselves may be deleted when I feel it's warranted, but, in accordance with policy, will not have their meanings changed.


A word of warning: I'm not here to validate you. If your contributions to Wikipedia suck, I'm not going to slap on a pair of rose-colored glasses and tell you what great potential you have for the future, I'm going to tell you your work sucked, why it sucked, and what you can do it make it not suck in the future. Spades will be called spades, and words will be pointed and direct; I will not pussyfoot around your deficits. For those unfamiliar with the concept, this is called "honesty."

If, on the other hand, your work on Wikipedia has been productive and helpful, and your comments intelligent and perceptive, you will have my help, my trust and my collegial respect, which will be difficult for you to lose.


Please click here to leave me a new message.


______________________________________________________ Top of talk page March 7, 2019


It is The Reader that we should consider on each and every edit we make to Wikipedia.
No paid editing
MOS is not mandatory
(see User:Ritchie333/MOS for Dummies)
(Life is too short!)
     A HORSE
     (crowd-sourced)

Articles that need serious visual work

[edit]

Reminder: to work on

[edit]

______________________________________________ Talk page editnotice March 7, 2008

It is The Reader that we should consider on each and every edit we make to Wikipedia.
"[Beyond My Ken is] the worst thing to ever happen to Wikipedia."
_____________________
If you came here to complain about a revert I made to an edit of yours, and I did not provide an edit summary, please assume that the edit summary would have been "Not an improvement" or "Better before." If I thought your edit was vandalism, I would not have used "Undo", I would have used "Rollback".
If I reverted your edit, and asked you to discuss it on the article talk page, please initiate the discussion there, so that all interested editors can participate. This user page is not the appropriate place for such discussions to take place.
Thanks, BMK
_____________________
Please note that I am not an admin. ("Never have been, never will be."TM)

______________________________________________________ User page March 7, 2019

code     thoughts     backstory     pics     editcount

Christ you know it ain't easy
You know how hard it can be
The way things are going
They're going to crucify me

The Ballad of John and Yoko
song by John Lennon
(single, May 1969)






Other

[edit]



=====================
[edit]


Roger Eatwell, Emeritus Professor of Comparative Politics at the University of Bath, writes that "[W]hilst populism and fascism differ notably ideologically, in practice the latter has borrowed aspects of populist discourse and style, and populism can degenerate into leader-oriented authoritarian and exclusionary politics."[1] For populism to transition into fascism or proto-fascism requires a "nihilistic culture and an intractable crisis."[2]

In regard to the authoritarian aspect of right-wing populism, political psychologist Shawn W. Rosenberg asserts that its "intellectual roots and underlying logic" are best seen as "a contemporary expression of the fascist ideologies of the early 20th century".

Guided by its roots in ideological fascism ... and its affinity to the fascist governments of 1930s Germany and Italy, [right-wing populism] tends to delegate unusual power to its leadership, more specifically its key leader. This leader embodies the will of the people, renders it clear for everyone else and executes accordingly. Thus distinctions between the leadership, the people as a whole and individuals are blurred as their will is joined in a single purpose. (p.5) ... In this political cultural conception, individuals have a secondary and somewhat derivative status. They are rendered meaningful and valued insofar as they are part of the collective, the people and the nation. Individuals are thus constituted as a mass who share a single common significant categorical quality – they are nationals, members of the nation. ... In this conception, the individual and the nation are inextricably intertwined, the line between them blurred. As suggested by philosophers of fascism ... the state is realized in the people and the people are realized in the state. It is a symbiotic relation. Individuals are realized in their manifestation of the national characteristics and by their participation in the national mission. In so doing, individuals are at once defined and valued, recognized and glorified. (p.12)[3]

According to Rosenberg, right-wing populism accepts the primacy of "the people", but rejects liberal democracy's protection of the rights of minorities, and favors ethno-nationalism over the legal concept of the nation as a polity, with the people as its members; in general, it rejects the rule of law. All of these attributes, as well as its favoring of strong political leadership, suggest right-wing populism's fascist leanings.[4] However, historian Federico Finchelstein in From Fascism to Populism in History states that "Properly historicized, populism is not fascism."

[P]opulism is like fascism in being a response to liberal and socialistic explanations of the poltical. And also like fascism, populism does not recognize a legitimate political place for an opposition that it regards as acting against the desires of the people and that it also accuses of being tyrannical, conspiratorial, and antidemocratic. ... The opponents are turned into public enemies, but only rhetorically. If populism moves from rhetorical emnity to practices of enemy identification and persecution, we could be talking about its transformation into fascism or another form of dictatorial repression. This has happened in the past ... and without question it could happen in the future. This morphing of populism back into fascism is always a possibility, but it is very uncommon, and when it does happen, and populism becomes fully antidemocratic, it is no longer populism.[5]

References

  1. ^ Eatwell, Roger (2017) "Populism and Fascism" in Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira;Taggart, Paul; Espejo, Paulina Ochoa; and Ostiguy, Pierre eds. The Oxford Handbook of Populism
  2. ^ Brown, Drew (October 31, 2018) "Where Does ‘Right-Wing Populism’ End, and Fascism Begin?" Vice
  3. ^ Rosenberg cites Gentile, G. (1928) The philosophic basis of fascism. Foreign Affairs, v.6, n.2 pp.290-304
  4. ^ Rosenberg, Shawn W. (2019) "Democracy Devouring Itself: The Rise of the Incompetent Citizen and the Appeal of Right Wing Populism" in Hur, Domenico Uhng and Sabucedo, José Manuel eds. (forthcoming) Psychology of Political and Everyday Extremisms
  5. ^ Federico Finchelstein, Federico (2019) From Fascism to Populism in History Berkeley, California: University of California Press. pp.5-6 ISBN 9780520309357