Template talk:ArbComBlock

Template:ArbComBlock is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.

Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

Edit request on 14 August 2012

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Perhaps the "in writing" bit should be removed? All appeals will obviously be made in writing, rather than, say, in the form of a YouTube video, so it seems rather redundant to include this. 85.117.21.156 (talk) 13:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{edit protected}} template. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:10, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done: [1]. However, this is otherwise fine as it is. AGK [•] 16:57, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 7 January 2013

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Can an admin change the e-mail address part? arbcom-appeals-enlists.wikimedia.org is the mailing list for appeals by blocked or banned users. Thanks Hto9950 (talk | contribs) 15:46, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 18:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted this edit. ArbCom blocks are made by the committee, and appeals of them are therefore never heard by the subcommittee. See also my edit in September 2012. AGK [•] 12:34, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we'll wait and see if someone that has the template placed on their talk page see if they appeal a block to ArbCom. For the moment, it is 50/50. Hto9950 17:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 6 December 2014

May I suggest replacing the word "outwith" with the word "beyond".--KTo288 (talk) 13:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 21 February 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please wrap the admin instructions in <span class="sysop-show">...</span> to hide them from non-admins Ppp ery 21:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done The horizontal rule remains. — Train2104 (t • c) 22:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Width

@AGK: Re. your revert: {{Banned user}}, and {{Sockpuppeteer}} for example. – Joe (talk) 21:20, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for missing your message! I was thinking of {{checkuserblock}} and all the templates listed at Template:Uw-block/doc/Block templates. And I suppose we are better using all the available space…? Not massively fussed if you want the template to be narrower. AGK ■ 19:42, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template-protected edit request on 24 June 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked you should review the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] then appeal by [[Special:Emailuser/Arbitration Committee|emailing the Arbitration Committee]] (direct address: ''{{Nospam|arbcom-en|wikimedia.org}})''.

to

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then appeal by [[Special:Emailuser/Arbitration Committee|emailing the Arbitration Committee]] (direct address: ''{{Nospam|arbcom-en|wikimedia.org}})''.

Reason: Proper grammar OutsideNormality (talk) 17:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Completed. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. ^{put'er there} 21:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 6 November 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change: add {{pp-semi-indef}} on the /doc subpage

Diff:

172.96.162.98 (talk) 03:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This would not do anything, furthermore please see the WP:Protection policy. CMD (talk) 05:52, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done; the page is indefinitely semi-protected, so adding the template is fine. ⟲ Three Sixty! ^Talk? _Work. 18:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]