Talk:Vincent Connare
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Website
[edit]This guy also has a website (at http://www.connare.com) but I can't get past the front page. It has the audacity to tell me off for having the "wrong" version of Macromedia Flash. Thus I don't feel motivated to link to it. If anyone can provide a link to a suitable page inside the website then we could link there. Richard W.M. Jones 08:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Comic Sans
[edit]Why are there so many external references leading to sites and articles about the controversy over Comic Sans when there isn't a mention of that controversy in the article. We either need to add something about that controversy to this article and how it relates to Mister Connare, or this nonsense should be removed, as none of it relates to him, only to something he created that people, a decade on, have decided they hate. 216.41.16.82 (talk) 16:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
See Also Section
[edit]Why is "God" in the See Also section for this guy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.104.212.15 (talk) 02:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
The subject of the article contributed heavily to the article itself
[edit]It should be noted that the subject of this article wrote a significant portion of this article and even uploaded his own photograph. He also may have contributed anonymously through one of the IP addresses in the UK... Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)