Talk:Tunbridge Wells F.C.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

Football: English non-league Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tunbridge Wells F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070905222643/http://www.tunbridgewellsfc.co.uk/col.asp?cid=38 to http://www.tunbridgewellsfc.co.uk/col.asp?cid=38

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:16, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

History a bit fuzzy

Currently the info box says the club was founded in 1886. The opening paragraph in the club history says that club folded in WWI.

The second sentence of that paragraph brings up Tunbridge Wells Rangers (later named Tunbridge Wells United and Tunbridge Wells FC) founded in 1903. I assume everything that follows is about them. By the third paragraph they have folded in 1967.

Shortly thereafter we get a new incarnation of Tunbridge Wells which presumably is the current club.

As I've understood it, the present day club claims the history and honours of two previous Tunbridge Wells FCs. This isn't very obvious from the single foundation date and single stream narrative. I would try to clarify the text myself but I'd like to make sure I understood this properly, so if anyone can confirm, shed light, or clarify, much obliged.

QuicoGaliana (talk) 13:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]