Jump to content

Talk:Tanks in the German Army

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rewrite

[edit]

I think most parts of this aritcle must be rewriten, because they are simply copy & pasted from other articles (e.g. the "Euro-Leopard"/"Global-Leopard" part is from the Leopard 2 article). -- User:Tim.vogt 18:17, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise the World War I section, much of it found heer. --Pete (talk) 23:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WWI section is appalling. Badly written, misinformed, no mention of LKI and LKII projects. Contradicts similar articles/sections elsewhere. All that's wrong with Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.255.234.150 (talk) 09:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge suggestion

[edit]

The section "Interwar period" contains many data and refs relared to Grosstraktor missing there. Also, please double-check whether Leichttraktor requires update with info from here (or vice versa). Staszek Lem (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The {{Merge}} template is inappropriate. Merging is blending two articles and having one left at end of it. This is about taking content from one and putting it in another. You can just copy the content from the one article to another and supply appropriate attribution for the edits. See Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia for policy and process. GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:49, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I want someone with expertise to do the merge, therefore I used the template. Now I found better ones: {{merge portions from}} {{merge portions to}}.Staszek Lem (talk) 21:53, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What fuel did WW2 German tanks use? alcohol?

[edit]

Were they forced to use alcohol? I see nothing about this in the article. (PeacePeace (talk) 02:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Splitting page

[edit]

I suggest that the WWI section be split off to a separate page in the same way that the WWII section is. Gusfriend (talk) 07:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]