Jump to content

Talk:Rassvet (ISS module)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


I believe the DCM is actually going to be attached to Zvezda, not Zarya. MLM will be attached to Zarya's nadir port. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:ISS_configuration_oct-2007_en.svg shows DCM attached to Zvezda. Unfortunately, I cannot confirm this, since every website on the internet seems to agree that both DCM and MLM are docked to the same port! The reference, which appears to be a posting on a forum judging by the URL, is broken. I'm just going to change it and hope I'm right.

Oops, never mind, just found a reference that says it's totally the other way around and that the above-linked chart is out-of-date! It looks like getting this right is going to be a major job, so I'll postpone it until I can gather better facts. Xezlec 17:05, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Updates to the russian ISS plans http://en.rian.ru/russia/20071109/87339260.html This doesn't really say much, but i'll leave it hear for the interested people. --TheDJ (talkcontribs) 23:04, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just so that people understand. This module is still under continuous design/name/position changes. The current information (most in Russian) that is probably still subject to change:
  • DCM renamed to MRM-1
  • Pirs to be dumped into the atmosphere for burnup before MLM arrives
  • MRM-2 to be added to zenith of Zvezda (a new pirs like module)
  • MRM-1 to be added to nadir Zarya (based on the old Science Power Module)
  • MLM to be added to nadir Zvezda
  • Node3 to be positioned (temporarily?) on portside of Unity
See also: http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=2881&mid=257401#M257401 --TheDJ (talkcontribs) 21:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rassvet on Shuttle...

[edit]

Why was it decided that the module would be launched by NASA as opposed to the Russian space agency? Was it due to the Shuttle's payload capabilities or international cooperation used in the ISS program? Dreammaker182 (talk) 17:20, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's basically an exchange of services between NASA and the Russian space agency; NASA carries Rassvet (and MLM outfitting) on the Shuttle, and Russians take US astronauts aboard Soyuz flights. 88.85.134.42 (talk) 22:15, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Its a little more then that. NASA and Roscosmos had a deal pre-Columbia to carry a module or 2 on shuttle. Post-Columbia it was modified, that shuttle would carry MRM-1 in order to be able to complete the U.S. Orbital segment of the ISS. It actually has nothing to do with RSA carrying NASA astro's, USA is paying Russia ~$52 million/seat. Its more of a barter deal for cargo on Progress, NASA carries Rassvet and Russia delivers some cargo on Progress. There is more in the deal but that's the main jist of it.--NavyBlue84 23:38, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who removed docking adapter on zarya nadir

[edit]

I noticed that progress ms 17 will remove nauka nadir docking adapter for prichal module but who removed zarya nadir docking adapter for Rassvet nadir I see no progress mentioning its disposal please tell if someone remembers or can find out Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It will be helpful if someone knows as I am making the iss structure diagram Chinakpradhan (talk) 15:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]