Talk:Project SAINT

Project SAINT has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 13, 2017	Good article nominee	Listed
May 9, 2017	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

Current status: Good article

Military history: Technology / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Spaceflight Mid‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Relationship with other ASAT projects Suggestion

@Lazyges: Would it be prudent to mention this projects relationship with other ASAT projects (and link to them ) such as Program 505 or Program 437? Johnvr4 (talk) 13:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnvr4: Program 505 is already mentioned at the bottom, but Project 437 is very interesting. I'll add in information about it. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:36, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant! At some point I was going to re-update Space Fence and all of the various iterations both historical and recent) and then those relationships to these subjects but it seems that term is currently being redefined and I will likely wait. I'm currently working on editing some pages (splitting a sandbox draft) that you might be interested re: U.S. WMDs, nukes, missiles, and chemicals in Japan. I can usually easily grasp how things fit together but I'm not a good writer or presenter or with WP policy and will need direction and guidance. I hope to have more interaction in the future. Johnvr4 (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]