Talk:Pete Ploszek
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on April 1 2014. The result of the discussion was soft delete. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Requested move 23 June 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. DrKay (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Pete Ploszek (actor) → Pete Ploszek – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Kanghuitari (talk) 05:28, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- Support. No rationale given but this looks fairly straightforward and uncontroversial. No other uses of this title. PC78 (talk) 09:01, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.