Talk:Omega language
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How can membership of $\omega$-regular languages be decidable?
[edit]If you say something is decidable unqualified then that means it's decidable by a Turing Machine. There is no way that membership of the language $\{a\}^\omega$ over the alphabet $\Sigma=\{a,b\}$ is decidable by a Turing machine. The articles on similar topics seem to make similar dubious or incorrect claims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.100.253 (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
It's perfectly standard usage to extend the concept of decidability to other models of computation. See paragraph 2 of Recursive language. In this case, as the text explains, these languages are decidable with a Buchi automaton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.252.62.244 (talk) 16:51, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class Computer science articles
- Unknown-importance Computer science articles
- WikiProject Computer science articles
- Start-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class logic articles
- Low-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles