Talk:Mount Aragats

	Mount Aragats is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Top‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy C‑class Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Which altitude is more correct, 4,090 or 4,095m? Would it be worth to mention the cosmic radiation observatory and Amberd?

I corrected the altitude, it is in fact 4,090. Feel free to write about Amberd and the observatory if you like. --Aramgutang 17:16, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

The GVP states its altitude as 4095m...

Guanlongwucaii (talk) 12:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Guanlongwucaii[reply]

Is that cosmic radiation observatory the Byurakan Observatory? I had it on mount "Aragatz" before.--Rayc 23:39, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Aragatz is a synonym. Global Volcanism Programme

Guanlongwucaii (talk) 12:46, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Guanlongwucaii[reply]

Inaccuracy in extinct/active/dormant status

The article says that the volcano is extinct and is a stratovolcano which last erupted within 10,000 years... Don't stratovolcanoes not go extinct that quickly? Guanlongwucaii (talk) 12:32, 31 May 2009 (UTC)Guanlongwucaii[reply]

Elevation and prominence

Just some info on a recent edit I made. The prominence for this peak had a citation needed tag so I took the time to find the source of the figure. Only problem is, that prom figure of 2143 m is based on an assumed total elevation of 4190 m, as apposed to the given height of 4095 m. We can't adjust the prom by 5 m to 2148 m because that would be OR/sythesis. So I found an additional source stating the 4090 m figure, changed the elevation in the article to 4090 m, cited all the new sources and left the existing ref for 4095 m where it was at. (Note: I also ran across a couple sources giving a height of 4091 m, so this new elevation of 4090 m may be more accurate in any case.)

If someone objects to this new elevation, it wouldn't be the worst thing to change it back to 4095 m and leave the prominence figure and its new ref as is. All this would amount to, is we would be certain that one or both of the figures would be at least 2.5 m in error.--Racerx11 (talk) 12:32, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The error margin in the elevation is probably greater than 5 m so the above matter is probably of little consequence, assuming your "assumed total elevation" should be 4090 m, and that your 4190 m is a typo. Viewfinder (talk) 02:51, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thats more or less my thoughts. I didn't really mean anything by my phrase you quoted "assumed total elevation". Awkward choice of words on my part. I was just merely pointing out that a prominence calculation will be based on an elevation figure of the peak in question. So if you accept and cite a prominence figure, then it follows you would also accept the elevation used to calculate it. But as you pointed out, if margin of error in these measurements is greater than difference, it becomes a moot point.

I only bring this up at all because when an editor does something like I did (changing an elevation that was properly sourced to begin with) I feel the need to give a better explanation than can be given in the edit summary. Thanks. --Racerx11 (talk) 04:14, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mount Aragats. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hairenik.com/armenianweekly/fea12240501.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Mount Aragats. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1tv.am/hy/news/2015/05/28/Շուրջպար/16568
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aras.am/BAO/history.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://encyclopedia.am/pages.php?bId=1&hId=72
Corrected formatting/usage for http://gspi.am/media/journal/2013n2a/Martirosyan L. M.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:52, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

More images

I am not familiar with our rules/norms for the Gallery section, but wanted to let folks know I just uploaded some additional photography to Wikimedia Commons under a free license:[1][2][3] in case it is useful here. I have a COI with the photographer. CorporateM (Talk) 18:17, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mt Aragat

In certain places water runs uphill. Balls roll uphill and in one demonstration a car even rolled uphill. 174.215.134.26 (talk) 23:32, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]