Talk:Morgellons

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Morgellons article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14: 90 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine C‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Morgellons be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Morgellons.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

There have been attempts to recruit editors of specific viewpoints to this article. If you've come here in response to such recruitment, please review the relevant Wikipedia policy on recruitment of editors, as well as the neutral point of view policy. Disputes on Wikipedia are resolved by consensus, not by majority vote.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 September 2023

Don't revive an 8-month-old discussion, especially just to post personal opinions not related to improving the encyclopedia. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 11:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Greetings. Your entry on Wiki for Morgellons does not include the most current, fact based and peer-reviewed information. You present this information as a delusional parasitosis, but it has been in fact proven to have basis in medical fact. I want you to include more information on your site and present a more balanced and accurate picture of the current understanding of Morgellons.

Although Morgellons was previously thought to be delusional parasitosis, more recent studies have found it to be substantiated and associated with spirochete infection and tickborne illness such as Lyme Disease.

<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7012249<ref>

<ref>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811176/<ref>

<ref>https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/morgellons-disease#summary<ref>

I therefore ask that you kindly include the above information and add it to the Wiki page in order to present correct, current and relevant information on this misunderstood and previously misdiagnosed disease.

Thank you. 2601:1C2:4C00:FFA0:3DEC:CD4:61AF:C864 (talk) 14:28, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. Middelveen's works have been requested many times before. Check the archives to find why they were rejected. --Hob Gadling (talk) 14:51, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i believe that people are going to keep dumping this dude here until you add a citation o his work somewhere in the body of the wiki... maybe a unreliable research section? 99.69.134.61 (talk) 19:36, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no quarrel with the decision not to include her work, but let's at least get it right that Dr. Middelveen, whose work I have no credentials to assess, is a woman. :) 208.99.255.70 (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:FRINGE on how to handle such stuff. --Hob Gadling (talk) 08:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And more generally, read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine). Wikipedia does not cite arbitrary primary-source studies as a means to contradict existing scientific consensus, and regarding medical topics, bases content on systematic reviews etc. AndyTheGrump (talk) 14:56, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! It's time we are taken serious so we can get to the root of what, why, how and a cure for the millions out there suffering because no one believed us. As far as the study done by the CDC.... wouldn't be the first time they been caught telling lies! 45.8.19.247 (talk) 03:52, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scientists don't believe people, they believe evidence. tgeorgescu (talk) 04:15, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 December 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Morgellons is not a "delusional disease".

"Evidence indicates that keratinocytes are the most likely source of the “mysterious” Morgellons fibers, and that these fibers are likely composed of keratin."

From the National Library of Medicine: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3257881/#:~:text=Evidence indicates that keratinocytes are,are likely composed of keratin. 24.205.110.222 (talk) 13:49, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done See the Archives, this has been discussed repeatedly. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 14:10, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Denialism

Scientists believe what they want to believe just like everyone else they believed evidence they would come to the consensus that this is not always psychosis especially all the information presented here phttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5811176/ 172.56.152.214 (talk) 16:19, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Middelveen paper has been mentioned many times. It was never found convincing. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Name origin

[Corrected my post] Can the section on where the name comes from be put earlier into the article, please? Or even a more prominent position. I came here to find that out, and it was not easy to find.

2A00:23EE:1748:5E5C:34A9:22FF:FEF5:BA0 (talk) 16:02, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How's that? Putting all of that detail in to the WP:LEAD would be too much, so I've created a separate section linked from the lead, making it more prominent. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]