Jump to content

Talk:Lockheed HC-130

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Are HC-130's capable of being refueled in-flight? If so, which method is used? "Boom and Receiver" or "Probe and Drogue"? I seem to remember seeing a "probe" on HC-130 aircraft, but since there isn't any photos on the article page, I can't confirm that. For refernce, see Aerial refueling article. --TGC55 16:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reguarding your question, I am currently in the air force as an aircraft electrician, and one of the models of C-130 I maintain is the HC-130P/N. Although I can not completely answer your question with absolute confidence, I can tell you that the HC-130P/N's that I work on are not capable of refueling in flight. However, that does not mean that all of them are not capable of being refueled in flight. I also work on MC-130P's and they are not capable of being refueled in flight either. But, the MC-130P's I maintained at my last base were. So If there are HC-130P/N's that are capable of being refueled in flight I can tell you that I have never maintained a C-130 that used the Probe and Drogue method. They all have used the Boom and Reciever method. (NucPhy7 22:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Hello. I am currently an HC-130 Airborne Mission Systems Specialist (Radio Operator). Currently there is 1 HC-130 in the active duty fleet that is capable of receiving fuel in flight. I cannot be exact on the tail number. The aircraft I am speaking of was a former EC-130 ABCCC from Davis-Monthan AFB. Once the 42nd AACS (EC-130 ABCCC) squadron was closed down, the plan was to convert all existing EC-130 ABCCC's into HC-130P's capable of receiving fuel in flight. After a cost-analysis was complete, AFTER the modification process had started, the Air Force, specifically AFSOC choose to stop the modification process once the 1st and only ABCCC -> HC-130 mod was complete because it cost too much. This aircraft is currently assigned to the 79th Rescue Squadron (ACC) at Davis-Monthan AFB, AZ.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lockheed HC-130. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Lockheed HC-130. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lockheed HC-130. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous performance data

[edit]

The performance data lists "Cruise speed: 290 knots (333 mph, 537 km/h)"... however this makes no mention whether this is groundspeed or airspeed, and the difference is close to 50%. This problem isn't specific to this article, however. I wonder if we can do something to clarify this, especially since Wikipedia readers are not tech savvy and should get accurate information for computing, say, a flight time over a given distance. -Rolypolyman (talk) 06:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lockheed_HC-130&oldid=1203730629"