Talk:List of colossal sculptures in situ

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

Scope

The article's scope needs attention. Rock-cut architecture, such as Ajanta, is different from sculpture, though the two may exist together. Johnbod (talk) 17:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hajar el Gouble or Hajar el Hibla

Which name should be used for the large in situ stone in Ballbek? Hajar el Hibla (stone of the Pregnant woman) seems to be more widespread than Hajar el Gouble (stone of the south) in a search I just did on the web, what are others thoughts on this?Halbared (talk) 09:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It won't hurt to mention both, I think they are both commonly known. Zacherystaylor (talk) 17:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vague colossal sculpture example from Africa

One of the in situ sculptures from Africa is called

   Seti I, Egypt – limestone

Which is linked to Seti I the pharaoh, father of Ramesses the Great, which is obviously incorrect, I couldn't find out what is being referenced there The history of the page contains the following entry

   Seti I Carved out of Limestone

Again I could not find what is this, some colossal limestone sculpture of Seti I? Anybody knows about this?
Is it maybe the Mortuary Temple of Seti I which is made out of limestone,
but does it count as a sculpture? It is a whole structure... --buræquete 03:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Bamiyan Valley–Buddha.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add dates?

I think it would enhance the article if dates, actual or approximate, were shown for each item, when applicable. [email protected] (talk) 01:00, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rio

Is the statue above Rio not big enough to qualify for this list? What about the statue of Liberty? Give that there are a couple of bronzes listed, which technically aren't sculptures? 87.115.80.212 (talk) 22:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do these belong in this article?

The following statues:

Athena Parthenos, Athens, lost.
Athena Promachos, Athens, lost.
Colossus of Rhodes, Greece, lost
Colossus of San Carlo Borromeo, Italy
Sperlonga sculptures, Italy
Colossus of Barletta, Italy

All, or almost all, are NOT stone works created in situ but rather are bronze or something similar, created elsewhere and assembled where they are. I am inclined to remove them, but since that would be my first edit here, decided to post here first. Carptrash (talk) 21:09, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

makes sense. IMO can be removed or moved to another section "not in situ". Perhaps rename the page to "List of colossal sculptures carved in situ" to avoid misinterpretation. Darwwin (talk) 06:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am wondering if there is another way to produce sculpture in situ other than carving and nothing is coming to mind. So the name change works for me. Carptrash (talk) 22:00, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]