Talk:Lip

Anatomy: Gross High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Poorly cited article

This article cites medilexicon.com 7 times out of a total of 12 citations. Needs to be redone/expanded with authentic sources. TheGarvitGupta (talk) 19:42, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing this out. I'd support any change you made in this regard, @TheGarvitGupta. --Tom (LT) (talk) 11:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Male/Female Lip Size

According to studies that measure the lips physically, men have larger lips. Women have overall smaller faces however and narrower lips. For whatever reason I've often seen it mentioned that women have larger lips though. I think it's partially due to a desire to legitimize changes in beauty standards, seeing as full lips are particularly trendy. Should I link some studies here that show the measured differences? Sleepyed (talk) 09:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Upper lip and Lower lip into Lip

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

}

No need for separate articles - needlessly fragments and duplicates topic. Easily presented on a single article. Tom (LT) (talk) 22:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support merging both to this article. Matthew Ferguson (talk) 18:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support merging both to this article and I combined the sections into one discussion. Two discussions is unnecessary duplication too :) Legacypac (talk) 03:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lip. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230085921/http://oralhealth.dent.umich.edu/VODI/html/03-oc/a-anatomy/lips.html to http://oralhealth.dent.umich.edu/VODI/html/03-oc/a-anatomy/lips.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Tubercle of the upper lip be merged into Lip. I think that the content in the Tubercle article can easily be explained in the context of Lip, and the Lip article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Tubercle will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. PepperBeast (talk) 03:09, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, merge. You can also leave a note about this at WP:Anatomy. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:39, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]