Talk:Lego Technic

Lego High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lego on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LegoWikipedia:WikiProject LegoTemplate:WikiProject LegoLego articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

Inaccurate information

According to brickset.com, the first lego technic sets were 851, 852, 853, 870 (https://brickset.com/sets/theme-Technic/page-4). Is there a reason we don't mention these sets on this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eukaryot740 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Powered Up is not included in here even though it was released in 2018. Can someone fix that? ¬¬¬¬ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:240:4100:1F6E:8D65:D59:CD76:23E5 (talk) 22:08, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

It would be awesome if there were pics of the actual studded and non-studded pieces to which this article refers. It took me a while to figure out what it was talking about. I didn't know what a "stud" was... And I'm a long-time AFOL! (Although I didn't realize what that was until I visited [1]!)

That'd be a good idea... I had the same confusion about studs when I first read that awhile ago. I can take some pictures a month from now, but if anyone can get some before then... Mairi 02:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't Technic original called 'Technical Lego'? IIRC (in the UK anyway). (Could be wrong though).

It was definitely branded as "Technic Lego" in the UK in the 80s (when I used to play with it) - "Lego Technic" just sounds awkward. --JamesTheNumberless 10:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was also branded as "Expert Builder" in the United States in the 80s 64.171.162.74 (talk) 08:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the 'flattened "brick" gear' refering to the rack of the rack and pinion system? If so, it should be change to describe this.

Does the article look abnormally small to anyone else? I thought it was bigger last time I read it. Ian01 02:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This sentence needs a rewrite: "One IR receiver would connect to the battery box whilst the other receiver connected to the motor (up to two motors per receiver), thus remote-control was achieved." The motors connect to receivers, which are both powered by the battery box. Different channels allow multiple receivers. It makes no sense to have a motor without a power source or receiver (switch) without a motor... --213.185.226.15 (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gear ratios

Do you think it would be worthy to put that the total possible ratios for lego gears is 2:3 1:2 2:5 2:9 1:5 3:4 1:3 3:10 4:5 4:9 5:9 and 9:10? 69.136.72.16 (talk) 01:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Brickipedia contains two quite illustrative Technic-related images: [2] and [3]. Would it be possible to include them in the article? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 11:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

disconjunction with other page

in this Article it is stated that the Expert Builder was renamed Technics in '84, but on the timeline at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego_timeline it is stated as '82.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.100.100.5 (talk) 17:57, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

These sets from 1982 were labeled "Technic." https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?S=8030-1#T=S&O={"rpp":"50","iconly":0}

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?O=8050-1&name=Building Set with Motor&category=[Technic][Universal Building Set]#T=S&O={"rpp":"50","iconly":0}

https://www.bricklink.com/v2/catalog/catalogitem.page?O=8090-1&name=Universal Set&category=[Technic][Universal Building Set]#T=S&O={"rpp":"50","iconly":0}

I'm going to correct the wiki. Do these links count as references? Skintigh (talk) 21:46, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lego Technic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080518152649/http://www.actionfigurecustoms.com/blogs/2007/10/2009-camaro-custom-lego-technic-by.php to http://www.actionfigurecustoms.com/blogs/2007/10/2009-camaro-custom-LEGO-technic-by.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]