Talk:Lands administrative divisions of Australia

A fact from Lands administrative divisions of Australia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that most of Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory have not been divided into cadastral units?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/March.

Wikipedia

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Maps Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MapsWikipedia:WikiProject MapsTemplate:WikiProject MapsMaps
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Australia Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Lands administrative divisions of Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Info needed

598 counties in Australia is based on: 141 (NSW) 49 (SA) 26 (WA) (the Nat. Library says 25 but the maps say 26) 322 (Qld) 5 (NT) 18 (Tas) 37 (Vic) = 598. This is a calculation I have made from the sources listed, it would be good to have this confirmed.
Also needed is a map and names of the 322 counties currently in Qld mentioned at [1], although I wonder why the stub articles we have now for County of Stanley, Queensland, County of Ward, Queensland and County of Canning, Queensland seem to refer to the old counties. Perhaps the "new" counties never took on. found here: [2]
~~Also need to add 8 more counties from the 1893 map to the South Australia map, and~~ find map of the location of the last ~~four~~ three counties of SA. (found Buxton on 1897 map)
Also need an explanation as to what the County of Norman (nourman?) on that 1893 map is. It is not listed at the counties of SA.
Another thing to find out is the early counties of Tasmania. There were at least three systems of subdivisions in Van Dieman's Land; the eighteen counties which cover the whole island which were used in the late nineteenth century and in some of the earlier maps; then there some early maps which show 36 counties covering a strip between Hobart and Launceston; then there are some other areas shown on quite a few maps which dont cover the west of the island - called Launceston, Norfolk Plains, Cambelltown, Clyde, Oatlands, Oyster Bay, New Norfolk, Richmond and Hobart Town. See 1852 map showing the last two mentioned. Some of the 36 counties are also on the earliest map of Tas at the national library, this 1826 map
How many parishes would there be in total? Adding NSW (7,459) Vic (2,914) Qld (5,319) you get 15,692.. but this doesnt include Tas. --Astrokey44 11:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lands administrative divisions of Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 18 external links on Lands administrative divisions of Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]