Talk:Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Comics Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.

Bad article

This is a very badly written article, clearly written by somebody who does not know much about patents or misuse. It totally misses the point of the case, and emphasizes an irrelevant quotation. This could be somebody's idea of a joke on Wikipedia. At the very least it makes WP look unprofessional, or not to put too fine a point on it, amateurish.

No mention of stare decisis. No mention of Court's explanation that misuse is not antitrust. No mention of the Court's explanation oif why it considers Brulotte correct.

And what is that silly red chart in the External Links doing in an article about a Supreme Court case?

Whoever wrote this also did not bother to use the search box to notice that there is at least one other more substantive write-up of this case in another WP article. Patent_misuse#Recent_changes

Would somebody who knows something about the subject matter totally rewrite this, please? @Edcolins:? @BD2412:? @Bearian:? @GregJackP:?
[[User:PraeceptorIP|@PraeceptorIP:]] (talk) 21:49, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now rewritten, mooting above comments. PraeceptorIP (talk) 22:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]