Talk:Kettle Creek (Pennsylvania)

Kettle Creek (Pennsylvania) has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 23, 2014. (Reviewed version).

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Kettle Creek (Pennsylvania) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 March 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Kettle Creek (pictured) watershed contains eight percent of the Class A Wild Trout Streams in Pennsylvania?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kettle Creek (Pennsylvania).

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kettle Creek (Pennsylvania)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Folklore1 (talk · contribs) 13:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I perform the review, I will update the following table. Please look below the table for my questions and comments. Folklore1 (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Clear, concise writing
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	See notes below about corrections applied.
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Sufficient coverage of subject
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Appropriate level of detail
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	consistently neutral tone
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	no recent edit wars
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	1 share-alike , 1 public domain, 1 Project Gutenberg
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Relevant images with appropriate captions
	7. Overall assessment.

Infobox

The photograph in the infobox should have a caption. Folklore1 (talk) 14:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Jakob (talk) 14:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

The following sentence, "It also experiences relatively high water temperatures.", has a clarification tag attached. This can be resolved by stating something a bit more specific than "relatively high". Is the temperature high enough that it would be a problem for coldwater fish? Folklore1 (talk) 14:10, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Folklore1: I changed it to "abnormally high water temperatures", which is the wording used in the article body. How does that sound? --Jakob (talk) 14:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Folklore1 (talk) 14:23, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed "Stewardship Township" to "Stewardson Township" Folklore1 (talk) 14:25, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hydraulogy

This section has two consecutive sentences beginning with "Acid mine drainage". If the two sentences were restructured and/or combined, it might make for easier reading. Folklore1 (talk) 15:09, 23 September 2014 (UTC) Done[reply]

Geology and geography

The fourth paragraph in this section contains a sentence beginning with a numeric character: "22% of the surface rock". This can be corrected by spelling out the number (except for big numbers that would result in a confusingly long string of words), or restructuring the sentence. Folklore1 (talk) 15:05, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Further down in this section, a sentence begins with "0.25". This could be corrected by restructuring the sentence of changing "0.25" to "A quarter mile". Folklore1 (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Watershed

The first paragraph of this section is quite busy with sentences that start with a numeric character. In the fifth paragraph, there is a sentence beginning with "48". Folklore1 (talk) 15:43, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History and industries

The ninth paragraph of this section contains a sentence beginning with "16". Folklore1 (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Biology

The seventh paragraph of this section contains a sentence beginning with "285". Folklore1 (talk) 16:20, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Folklore1: The numbers at the beginnings of sentences (in all the sections) have been fixed now. --Jakob (talk) 18:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A few numbers escaped. I shot 'em with semicolons. I think I got the last of them. Folklore1 (talk) 18:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Done[reply]

Suggestion for continuing improvements

Some of the supporting sources for this article are quite long. It would be helpful to readers if the references cited pages where specific information can be found. Please consider this as a recommendation for continuing improvements. I think the article has reached the GA level, so I'm going to approve it now. Folklore1 (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kettle Creek (Pennsylvania). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]