Talk:KVUE

United States: Texas / Austin Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas - Austin (assessed as Mid-importance).

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

On 13 November 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from KVUE (Texas) to KVUE. The result of the discussion was moved.

Fair use rationale for Image:Kvue90s2.jpg

Image:Kvue90s2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:03, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kvuetoday.jpg

Image:Kvuetoday.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to article

I am deleting a line in the article that reports that KVUE has shut down its analog transmitter. I know for a fact that at this present time, KVUE still broadcasts in analog. Griffinofwales (talk) 04:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

new to weather team

http://www.kvue.com/on-tv/bios/100469654.html 24.28.17.212 (talk) 04:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sisters meet after 54 years

Waiting for the day to finally meet her —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.32.184.128 (talk) 17:54, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KVUE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 13 November 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 20:06, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KVUE (Texas) → KVUE
KVUE → KVUE (disambiguation)

– @George Ho: moved the article without consensus, as the Austin station is the primary topic. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I assumed that KVUE would no longer have primacy, regardless of the statuses of topics. A few (or more) articles intended to link to the defunct California station, like 1959 in television. Well, I figured that many other articles would refer to a Texas TV station, but... I don't know... Oh, BTW, I got confused by KUVE. --George Ho (talk) 18:19, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support without delay @George Ho: We assume that the current user of a broadcast call sign is the primary topic because it's very likely to be what users are searching for. That's the Texas station. Per WP:NCBC, whose current revision I mostly wrote, [A]n active radio or television station should be presumed to be the primary topic for the call sign it holds. Interest will logically tilt toward an active broadcasting entity rather than one that very, very briefly exists. I admit I've been bad at putting hatnotes when needed to link these pages (most of our articles on former television stations in recent years have been projects of mine), but that's on me. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:44, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I can imagine instances where a defunct or renamed station would be primary or at least would be the reason that an active station were not primary. But this is not one of them. The naming convention is very well written and comprehensive and official (it is wonderful how people do the right things sometimes!) but perhaps needs a minor tweak on this point. That doesn't affect this case. Andrewa (talk) 18:59, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.