Talk:Julian Huxley

Julian Huxley was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 6, 2006	Good article nominee	Not listed

Biography: Military / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Evolutionary biology Mid‑importance

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ecology Mid‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

University of Oxford Mid‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transhumanism Mid‑importance

Julian Huxley' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.TranshumanismWikipedia:WikiProject TranshumanismTemplate:WikiProject TranshumanismTranshumanism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

For more information and how you can help click Show:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.

Quick help:

See changes to:

To Do List:

edit - history - watch - purge

Join WikiProject transhumanism and be bold

Show off a userbox with {{userWPA}} or {{userWPA2}} and attract potential members
Help with articles.
See this month's adopt an article.
Help out with the To-do lists

Be consistent

Use a "standard" layout for transhumanism related articles (see: The perfect article, and Featured articles)
Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see navigation template)
Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box)
Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the list of transhumanism articles

Maintenance / Etc

Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources.
Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process)
Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see transhumanism articles)
And always write for an encyclopedia.

Create

Notable transhumanist articles

Shorten / merge into others

Expand

a transhumanism stub

Your immediate attention

false choice into false dilemma - discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
Clarify references in Transhumanism, using footnotes.

Military history: Biography / British / European / World War I C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Failed GA

This article failed to become a good article due to lack of references. --Pagrashtak 03:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For consistency, there should be a photo for Julian in the main article, like there is for Andrew. In fact there is none for Aldous?!

Phrenology

Was it not Julian Huxley, who was a total racist and phrenologist? --Nemesis1981 20:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you tell us. How was he racist and what was his interest in phrenology, and what are your sources? --Dannyno 13:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. It was not Julian, who was a phrenologist, but he is in the family tradition. I will write more on him soon, with all relevant sources. --Nemesis1981 20:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eugenetics secion

"Lysenkoism was dangerous because it stopped the artificial selection of crops on Darwinian principles, which eventually led to famine." If you follow the link on Lysenkoism the article seems to imply that Lysenkoism was in response to the famine and found its support in part as being a response to famine not so much as a contributing factor. This makes this sentence ambiguous - is it Lysenkoism or artificial selection "which eventually led to famine?" I don't have the background or knowledge to alter this in the article, but am bringing it up for someone who does. —Emnipass 15:14, 7 September 2006 (UTC)Emnipass[reply]

The Huxley's family tree and other members, notably Francis Huxley

There is a book called The Huxleys, by Ronald W. Clark that is all about this family, with a lot of information, and photos. I would like to add this information, with some help. I would also like to add another generation, including Francis, a well-known living anthropologist and author. Whom should I contact about this? --Daniel Schwab

Disambiguation

Do we really need the disambig link to a rugby player? It is very obtrusive, and interferes with the important intro text. I'm going to vanish it if no reply soon! Macdonald-ross 12:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

I'm going to organise some photos of Julian Hux pre-1938 -- hence out of copyright -- from some of the biogs listed on the page. There's some tremendous post-WWII photos of Julian and Aldous: pity we can't use them! Macdonald-ross 14:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now done. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eugenics V-P and Pres

These positions are not paid appointments, and carry no executive power; therefore I'm taking them out of the intro and leaving them in the eugenics section. OK? Macdonald-ross (talk) 16:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GCHQ?

This must be shorthand for 'British Intelligence' in 1916. --Steve (talk) 07:59, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was someone's 'helpful' link! In WP, helpful but ignorant changes can be greater hazard than vandalism. This one slipped in under the radar; thanks for alerting us. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:22, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Julian Huxley was an eugenicist

Julian Huxley, an eugenicist and signatorie of the Eugenics manifesto on September,1939.He was also a racist and a supporter of eugenics sterilization. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agre22 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blog-like post adds nothing. The article contains an accurate and well-referenced account of JSH's eugenics beliefs and his anti-racist efforts for UNESCO. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:49, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article is clearly biased. Mentions on eugenics and racism are left to the very end of the text, leaving an impression of perfection on Huxley. That is made even worse by the fact that no comments on his racism are present on the introductory text. I will try and work that out. 200.180.231.36 (talk) 00:16, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything in the article is supported by references to reliable sources. Huxley's association with eugenics has its place in the article. However, his lasting importance as a biological scientist is correctly given precedence, and this is supported by his biographers. He was not a racist; his eugenics referred to "the lowest classes in society", which is not the same thing as racism. Whilst Director of UNESCO, as the text says:

"After the Second World War he was instrumental in producing the UNESCO statement The Race Question,[71] which asserted that:

"A race, from the biological standpoint, may therefore be defined as one of the group of populations constituting the species Homo sapiens"... "Now what has the scientist to say about the groups of mankind which may be recognized at the present time? Human races can be and have been differently classified by different anthropologists, but at the present time most anthropologists agree on classifying the greater part of present-day mankind into three major divisions, as follows: The Mongoloid Division; The Negroid Division; The Caucasoid Division."... "Catholics, Protestants, Moslems and Jews are not races..."

What's the intention of dropping this quote out of context? The Race Question is clearly anti-rasist. Download it and see for yourself. 195.67.45.178 (talk) 13:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He talked about three races but he is not a racist.

Fine 81.38.194.71 (talk) 23:46, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed a brief factual statement of his allegiance to eugenics in the intro. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:30, 24 July 2009

(UTC)

Facts are facts. Julian Huxley was an eugenist as an ecologist. Both are the same thing. All eugenists and ecologist are ever bigoted, racists and charlatans. Julian Huxley was an eugenicist and among the signatories of the Eugenics manifesto on September,1939. He was also a racist and a supporter of eugenics sterilization. Facts are facts and that's all.Agre22 (talk) 12:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)agre22[reply]

So you are assering that all ecologists are bigotred, racists and charlatans, and therefore Huxley was a racist? Perhaps you should read what he actually wrote about racism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.67.45.178 (talk) 13:32, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Misquoting Huxley

This is a misquote: "The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore… they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive; long unemployment should be a ground for sterilisation.". Huxley did not advocate this, as the article suggests. On the contrary, he clearly argued against it. See page 68-69. Has the poster(s) even read the book??? This quote is akin to saying that Darwin argued that evolution can not create the eye.

Quoting the mentioned paragraph on p.68-69: "It will, however, by now have become clear that neither of these approaches is so satisfactory as the third. Indeed, neither is methodologically sound. If the aim of eugenics be to control the evolution of the human species and guide it in a desirable direction, and if the genetic selection should always be practiced in relation to an appropriate environment, then it is an unscientific and wasteful procedure not to attempt to control environment at the same time as genetic quality. Science is simultaneously both theory and practice, both knowledge and control. For the applied science of eugenics to neglect the environment is a source both of confusion and of practical weakness. I would go further: I would say that we cannot succeed in achieving anything in the nature of adequate positive eugenics unless we attempt the control of the social environment simultaneously with the control of the human germ-plasm, any more than Stapledon could have improved his rough mountain grazings save by a similar double attack." (emphasis mine)

/Benzocaine (talk) 18:32, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please also note that when the abovementioned quote was written, Huxley had the exact opposite opinion:

Though he never really overcame the belief that, on average, members of the very lowest income groups were genetically less well-endowed than members of the upper -- especially professional -- classes, in the 1930s, he was soon persuaded that his views on compulsory sterilization of the unemployed merely aided and abetted Nazism. He came to stress the importance to both eugenics and society of adequate diet, health care, housing, and education. "Don't let's go on pretending it's all the dear old Edwardian Age!," he exclaimed to a friend. In his celebrated 1936 lecture to the Eugenics Society, Huxley said flatly that a system based on private capitalism and public nationalism was ipso facto dysgenic: it failed to utilize existing reservoirs of valuable genes and it led to the ultimate dysgenics -- war. He declared, "We can't do much practical eugenics until we have more or less equalized the environmental opportunities of all classes and types -- and this must be by levelling up." ("Huxley and the Popularization of Science." Daniel j. Kevles. A symposium on Julian Huxley, 1887-1975 Rice University, september 25-27, 1987. p.6)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Julian Huxley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julian Huxley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110522082157/http://www.transhumanism.org/index.php/WTA/more/huxley to http://www.transhumanism.org/index.php/WTA/more/huxley

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bi-polar disorder

There doesn't appear to be any sign that JH ever received a diagnosis of bi-polar disorder, or in the terminology of his day, manic depression, and yet he is placed in the category of bi-polar sufferers at the bottom of the article. I'm not sure how high the bar is here, but perhaps this is mistaken? Daedalus 96 (talk) 22:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]