This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
In reference to the speedy deletion; I added that Interstate was recognized for their compliance with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and then put the link for the Washington Post article after it. If this was not done properly, I apologize. Interstate had to go through an extensive investigation through Homeland Security in order to receive this accreditation; I currently am unaware of any other company in their industry that has gone through this process. Thanks.
Franky, I couldn't care less whether a company is recognised as compliant. They're meant to be. If you apply that criteria then every company in the world that has attained, say, ISO9500 standard should have an entry, regardless of size/influence/sector etc. It is a silly argument and I'm considering taking this to AfD. - Sitush (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've now trawled through all that I can and expanded the article a bit (well, doubled it). I can now accept that it is "notable" under the WP policies, even if perhaps not in the real world. Really could do with some industry stats: where does it rank among - excuse the pun - the movers and shakers of this industry in the US, etc. Presumably there are surveys out there, probably in trade publications. - Sitush (talk) 22:05, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]