This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article currently points to If 6 Was 9; it is a #74 hit from 1994 and lends its name to an album of the same name. Would it be better to move the album here and bung a hatnote on top of it, or write the album article at If 60's Were 90's (album) and keep this article redirected there?--Launchballer10:36, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Then this album should be deleted based on the criteria that you linked which states: "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works." Technical 13 (talk) 12:05, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that'll teach me for quoting policies I've not even read! The relevant policy is WP:A9, which says "No indication of importance (musical recordings)", which only applies if its artist didn't have an article.--Launchballer12:55, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest LB, there is so little content between this album, the song, and the band, that I see no reason not to put all of the information in one half decent start or even C class article on the band's page. I would think this preferred over having three or four stub class articles. All of these other page titles could simply redirect to the band's page. Technical 13 (talk) 13:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
