Talk:IEEE 802.2
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Talk:IEEE_802.2/OldVersion was copied or moved into IEEE 802.2 with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later. |
SAP numbers
[edit]Urm, "There is room for 64 globally assigned SAP numbers IEEE does not give them to anyone IP does not have one Only “international standards” could be given globally assigned SAP numbers For globally assigned SAP numbers, DSAP = SSAP. (so why two fields?) Other protocols have to work it out in the locally administered space, but must be coordinated" reads really badly - but I'm no expert, so don't want to attempt fixing it and being wrong... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.6.97.218 (talk • contribs) 11:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC).
LLC classes
[edit]This or LLC page should have information no only about LLC Types but also about LLC Classes which are made from these types, they are 4 I, II, III, IV. krampo 11:47, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. Guy Harris 17:07, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Confusing PDU
[edit]PDU is not defined. It is not necessarily confusing; that is dependent on the reader. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.118.255.166 (talk) 22:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
- tried to fix that for you. This whole article is difficult to understand. I have marked it as such. --Kvng (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- C-Class Computing articles
- Low-importance Computing articles
- C-Class Computer networking articles
- Mid-importance Computer networking articles
- C-Class Computer networking articles of Mid-importance
- All Computer networking articles
- C-Class Computer hardware articles
- Low-importance Computer hardware articles
- C-Class Computer hardware articles of Low-importance
- All Computing articles