Talk:Gray-Nicolls

‹ The template below (WikiProject Cricket) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

Cricket Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Added section

I added a history section. Not sure what to do with the previous text. --58.179.70.59 01:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Gray Nicolls logo.png

Image:Gray Nicolls logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

The article needs Refs or it should be deleted. --94.102.155.98 (talk) 20:10, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Endorsements

Without proper references this whole section is bordering on SPAM and should not be included. Such claims must be cited or it could be libellous. --136.173.162.129 (talk) 12:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As with other sporting goods manufacturers (e.g. Nike, Adidas, etc.), endorsement deals with high profile international sports stars are notable and worthy of inclusion in the article. Sourcing can be difficult, as only the most prominent players will have their deals covered in the mainstream press, but that is not reason to discard everything. It is neither spam, not libellous. The only problem is that the company website is the only possible source for a full list or endorsement deals. _wjemather ^bigissue 13:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but verifiability is one of the 5 pillars of Wikipedia, and we cannot use the names of prominent public figures in relation to an article without reliable sources (i.e. WP:BLP). --136.173.162.129 (talk) 13:35, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong agreement with the IP. There's no reason why this or any article should include a list of names which cannot be verified. I see aspects of WP:ADVERTISING here also. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is a poor excuse. The lists have been tagged as needing sources for over 2 years now and the burden of proof is on those who wish the lists to remain. In the meantime, lists removed. Moondyne (talk) 14:05, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]