Talk:Gangnam/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Praseodymium-141 (talk · contribs) 11:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Praseodymium-141 Hi, any updates? :3 F4U (they /it) 05:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the very long delay, I'll probably get to this later today. ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 07:29, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible if we could pass this review onto someone else? I have really important matters going on in real life. Sorry! ¹⁴¹ Pr {contribs} 15:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Praseodymium-141 That's alright :) I've pushed the "ask 2nd opinion" button. :3 F4U (they /it) 17:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Article seems fine from a glance. I'll review it later.

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)