Talk:GQ Lupi

Infobox

The use of the infobox {{OrbitboxOnePlanet}} instead of {{OrbitboxPlanet}} et al. is superior in two ways:

1. The template does not display unnecessary fields with unknown values, which are filled with question marks.
2. The template has the more precise section header "Observed projected separation" instead of the imprecise "Orbital distance" (which is linked to Semimajor axis, definitely incorrect in this case.)

Therefore, I believe that the article is clearer if the template {{OrbitboxOnePlanet}} is used. Spacepotato (talk) 01:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

I do agree that this template has its positives. However, this template only worked good for a small amount of pages. Other than that, I do agree with that you state. — NuclearVacuum 02:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

OK, glad that's cleared up. Spacepotato (talk) 02:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on GQ Lupi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080507074340/http://www.eso.org/public/outreach/press-rel/pr-2005/pr-09-05.html to http://www.eso.org/public/outreach/press-rel/pr-2005/pr-09-05.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029204807/http://www.dtm.ciw.edu/boss/planets.html to http://www.dtm.ciw.edu/boss/planets.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)