Talk:Foreign relations of Lebanon

Lebanon High‑importance

	Lebanon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lebanon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lebanon-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LebanonWikipedia:WikiProject LebanonTemplate:WikiProject LebanonLebanon articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Lebanon enjoys good relations with virtually all of its Arab neighbors (except Syria) (despite historic tensions with Libya, the Palestinians, and Iraq),"

When there are that many major exceptions, I think "good relations with virtually all of its Arab neighbors" is a unmerited statement. Does anyone support changing this? Is anyone against a change?

A more accurate description would be "Lebanon has traditionally enjoyed good relations with other pro-Western Arab states." Dinopup 04:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Sheba Farms is a largely unpopulated area of South Lebanon, occupied by Israel in 1967. Hizballah sought to use the captives for leverage to release Lebanese prisoners whom Israel has admitted were taken for political purposes."

Shouldn't it be mentioned that Sheba Farms is, according to the UN, Syrian land, not part of Lebanon? Also, is there a source for the Israeli admittance that captives were taken for political purposes? (And what are "political purposes"?) Leauki 22:28, 26 May 2006 (GMT)

Added UN report indicating that Shebaa farms is part of Syria, not Lebanon. I assume that captives taken for political purposes = bargaining chips, but I'm not too sure in this case. Will look more. Fufthmin 13:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No menton of 2006 Israeli agression against Lebanon?

This agression has soured the relationship between the Lebanese and Israelis even more and should be mentioned in the article. Just last week, Prime Minister Saniora rejected peace talks with the Israelis saying that Lebanon would "be the last Arab country that could sign a peace agreement with Israel." See http://www.forbes.com/home/feeds/ap/2006/09/03/ap2990736.html --Inahet 23:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Entry with an Israeli visa stamp

I went to Lebanon for a holiday last weekend. An Italian friend I travelled with had an Israeli stamp in his passport and was admitted with no problem. He was questioned more than the others on the trip and given an exit card that he was told to show when leaving the country. That was all. The comment on the page that people are refused entry with an Israeli stamp is not referenced, having said that, I can't reference my experience this weekend, and it would count as "original research". Having said that, it seems daft to leave clearly incorrect information here. Fork me (talk) 21:59, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Foreign relations of Lebanon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]