Talk:CNR (software)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

References

The references are missing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.69.200.64 (talk • contribs) 07:02, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it Tcrow777 talk 03:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In Re: RPM support I was on staff at Lindows/Linspire yes the goal was to support RPM in the CNR Warehouse. I do not know if i can find any public supporting documentation at this point however.

Page move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

I am wanting to request Click'N'Run to be moved, but I do not know the correct place. Here are the possible places:

"Click and Run"
"Click 'n' Run"
"Click n' Run"
"Click 'n Run"

additionally I would like to know if the "R" and "n" above should be capitalized. Tcrow777 talk 04:26, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like it's referred to as CNR only, so it should be moved to CNR (installer) or a better term inside the brackets. –Pomte 06:09, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, the official website only calls it "CNR". I was thinking something like CNR (Linux software), or whatever is most appropriate. TJ Spyke 07:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There hard to find, but I have found a few Linspire/Freespire websites that call it something like "click n run" the capitalization of "r" and "n" and how they work with the "n" ('n' OR n' OR 'n) varies. Tcrow777 talk 23:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have desided decided go with "Click N' Run. Tcrow777 talk 21:54, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But I need your consensus to go forward. Tcrow777 talk 21:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

We seem to have agreed that the official name is "CNR", which helpfully bypasses the issues of capitalisation and apostrophes. The simplest disambiguation format would appear to be " (software)", since there is no other software called "CNR" on Wikipedia. This article has been renamed from Click'N'Run to CNR (software) as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 06:12, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay with me, but technically it is not software. Tcrow777 talk 04:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Clicknrun2.jpg

Image:Clicknrun2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:33, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

update please!

this article is way out of date! it talks about stuff that "should be ready by 2008." 84.138.215.140 (talk) 11:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One question...

I'm looking at the articles for Ubuntu Software Center, CNR (software), and Synaptic (software), and one thing is a little ambiguous. Do you need to use them like an App-store to download and install software from a certain associated website? Or can you use some/all of these to install a .deb program file that's sitting on your desktop? Which (if any) of these can you use as a GUI to install software if you don't have an internet connection and you copy the package to your computer from a flash-drive? (Or you download something obscure from the project's own website, or SourceForge, or bit-torrent, or where-ever...) Maybe this should be obvious, but it seemed a bit unclear to me, so a clarification would be appreciated, and some other readers would probably appreciate more clarification in the articles as well. Thanks! :-) 84.138.195.88 (talk) 10:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on CNR (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070623020834/http://www.cnr.com:80/faq.html#ubuntu to http://www.cnr.com/faq.html#cnrfaq

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CNR (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]