Talk:Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting

This page was proposed for deletion by Abductive (talk · contribs) on 12 July 2009 with the comment:
A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.
It was seconded by Flaming (talk · contribs) on 2009-07-13
It was contested by Ceiriog (talk · contribs) on 2009-07-17 with the comment:
Citations to reliable sources added to article

Christianity: India / Quakers Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Christianity in India (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Religious Society of Friends (Quakers) (assessed as Mid-importance).

India: Madhya Pradesh Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Article for deletion

This article has been marked for deletion. The reason given is "A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability". I have added references to this article. Many of these are in fact the same sources which the editor who proposed deletion found at Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting – news, books, scholar. As the editor who has proposed deletion has not discussed this on the discussion page, I am unsure whether his/her objection to the references that he/she found was that there were simply not enough of them or that the sources found were not reliable enough? Any article about an organisation in Madhya Pradesh is likely to have smaller number of web links on Google than a British or American organisation simply because the web is a less common way of communicating in rural India - I don't think you can decide on the notability of a topic purely based on the number of weblinks you can find to that topic. If Britain Yearly Meeting and Philadelphia Yearly Meeting are each notable enough to have Wikipedia articles, then why not Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting? To only have Wikipedia articles for British and American Yearly Meetings but not African and Asian ones solely on the basis that they do not have as many weblinks on Google will produce a very culturally skewed encyclopedia. If the editor who feels the topic is insufficiently notable would like to explain his/her decision on this discussion page maybe this could be discussed. As I have now added references to statements in this article, I will remove the article for deletion tag. Ceiriog (talk) 12:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090124222831/http://www.pym.org/pym_wgs/comments.php?id=2494_0_257_0_C to http://www.pym.org/pym_wgs/comments.php?id=2494_0_257_0_C

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bundelkhand Yearly Meeting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]