Talk:Buffalo Creek (West Branch Susquehanna River tributary)
Buffalo Creek (West Branch Susquehanna River tributary) has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 24, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Buffalo Creek (West Branch Susquehanna River tributary) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 May 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Buffalo Creek (West Branch Susquehanna River)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: TheQ Editor (talk · contribs) 21:06, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
Review
[edit]I see how much you dedicated to this article. Great Job, and sorry for the incovenience... (I got distracted).TheQ Editor (Talk) 22:04, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
- Well written
-
- The section "history" should be the first section
- The article should need a map
- Should include wikilinks in infobox.
- Referencing
-
- The last paragraph to the lead section needs a reliable reference
- The forests in the Buffalo Creek watershed are mostly deciduous hardwood, hemlock, and pine. needs a reference
- To avoid a a long reflist, the reflist should be formatted with {{reflist|2}}
- Broadness
-
- Covers all the main aspects. Double checked with Wikiproject Rivers
- NPOV
-
- no problems
- Stability
-
- Stable, no edit wars, in fact no vandalism ever detected!
- Images
-
- As I said earlier, needs a map.
Comments
[edit]- "The section "history" should be the first section"
- Actually, the course section comes first on most river articles in the area, like Fishing Creek (North Branch Susquehanna River).
- "The article should need a map"
- Added one, although User:Kmusser could probably make a better one (like this one).
- "Should include wikilinks in infobox."
- Done
- "The last paragraph to the lead section needs a reliable reference"
- The lead section does not generally need references, see WP:LEAD.
- "The forests in the Buffalo Creek watershed are mostly deciduous hardwood, hemlock, and pine. needs a reference"
- The lead does not need references because it summarizes the article, which is referenced. This particular fact is repeated in the 3rd paragraph of the biology section and cited to reference #11.
- "To avoid a a long reflist, the reflist should be formatted with {{reflist|2}}"
- Done
--Jakob (talk) (my editor review) 23:39, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
The bison of Buffalo Creek
[edit]I have reinforced my correction as to the etymology of this Buffalo Creek- indeed, as of other Buffalo Creeks. with references to Mark Catesby's well-known published plate (1747) and the Wikipedia page List of mammals of West Virginia, which has a paragraph of these bison. My edit was reverted by an editor unaware (as was his cited source) of the extinct subspecies Bison bison pennsylvanicus, the Eastern Wood Bison.--Wetman (talk) 18:29, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Buffalo Creek (West Branch Susquehanna River). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66gupqQDM?url=http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ to http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Buffalo Creek (West Branch Susquehanna River). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203022110/http://www.usgwarchives.org/maps/pa/county/union/usgs/ebuffalo.jpg to http://www.usgwarchives.org/maps/pa/county/union/usgs/ebuffalo.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 27 July 2017 (UTC)