Talk:Bengalis/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions about Bengalis. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
List of people in the collage
Let's stop the war and try to settle for a list of people in the collage.
Proposal
Recently couple of editors have turned to each other with a long fight over whom to put in the collage and whom not. Arguably this list can contain some (5*6=) 30 people. They have to be very representative of Bengali people, including Bengali people from Bangladesh, West Bengal and abroad; people from history and from today; including politicians, artists and scientists. So lets discuss before making anymore inconsistent edits.
Let us try to fill in the gaps with some categorized distribution. I propose following estimate:
- Bangladesh: 12~13, West Bengal: 12~13, Abroad: 4~6
- Ancient (Before ~1800): 3~4, Renaissance/British Raj (1800~1950): 10~13, Post colonial and Modern (1950~Today): 13~17
- Nobel laureates:3. Leaders (Social and political): 5~6,World Famous Entertainers: 4~5, Athletes with world records or victory in world championships not just local matches: 4~5, scientists/academicians: 4~5, Authors whose works are adapted into movies/translated into non-bengali languages/have got Booker Prize/Nobel Prize: 4~5, Artists with international fame: 3~4, Others: 5~8.
~ nafSadh did say 15:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
Alternative proposal
Now that less than 2 days left for closure we have a rough idea of the biases. It became even clearer as I kept adding EVERY suggestion ever made. And clearer still when I kept redesigning the descriptions to maximize its potential. I hope that hard work is done.
From the biases evident in the voting trends and nomination trends we can have a quota system like the following:
- Statesman: 2
- Political leader: 1
- Revolutionary leader: 1
- Religious leader: 1
- Spiritual leader: 2
- Reformer: 2
- Author: 2
- Athlete: 2
- Scientist: 2
- Scholar: 2
- Musician/Singer: 2
- Dancer/Entertainer: 1
- Film maker: 1
- Film star: 2 (M/F)
- Artist: 2
- Other: 4
As for periods, there are only 4 eligible nominations from ancient and medieval ages. ALL of them qualify anyways. That also covers the spiritual leader part. Both Chaitanya and Atisa are from those times. Since the enthusiasm is more for recent people, I propose to divide the 26 left as:
- Renaissance: 8
- Modern: 8
- Contemporary: 10 (people still working at the stuff they are famous for)
I suspect that the renaissance entries would be ALL from West Bengal, and the diaspora entries would ALL be among the contemporaries.
For regions, I don't think we need to have particular quotas for Bangladesh/East Bengal and West Bengal, particularly because there is a plain Bengal segment. It doesn't serve any purpose anyways, since this is not about Bangladeshi Bengalis or West Bengal Bengalis. This is, plainly, about all Bengalis. All I request are:
- Please have a quota for the diaspora. I propose: 3
- Do not let the number of final entries from any part of Bengal (Bangladesh/East Bengal and West Bengal) go down to less than one third, which means: 9
- At that, I think, those marked with India can be counted as part of West Bengal entries
And, one final consideration:
- Keep the number of female entries not less then one fourth of the total, which means: 8
Discussion on the proposals
Proposal 1
- I have put in a few names. May be the above scheme needs a bit of tweaking:
- We can't leave out the saints.
- Bangladesh/West Bengal may not be enough. Describing my proposals, I could manage East/West Bengal at the best.
- Nice initiative though. Aditya(talk • contribs) 16:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tweaks. Bangladesh can be he de-facto alternative for East Bengal. Specially for people from past, it is not easy to attribute them to either East or West. In that case, we can just use Bengal and count it as half from both BD and WB. nafSadh did say 16:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- I added broad categories. Saints can be classified as Leaders. ~ nafSadh did say 16:58, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- I believe anything post-colonial is modern. What is the benefit in slicing up a span of half a century into two parts? Aditya(talk • contribs) 18:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Debatable. But, yeah I agree. Making changes.~ nafSadh did say 18:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Incidentally there's not too many women in the list. Aditya(talk • contribs) 10:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- I have included a note to limit votes to 30. It will encourage more responsible voting. Aditya(talk • contribs) 12:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- One big issue - how long shall this remain open for voting? At the current rate of participation I can't see a consensus in next few years. Aditya(talk • contribs) 06:11, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- I have included a note to limit votes to 30. It will encourage more responsible voting. Aditya(talk • contribs) 12:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Incidentally there's not too many women in the list. Aditya(talk • contribs) 10:22, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
- Debatable. But, yeah I agree. Making changes.~ nafSadh did say 18:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- I believe anything post-colonial is modern. What is the benefit in slicing up a span of half a century into two parts? Aditya(talk • contribs) 18:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- I have put in a few names. May be the above scheme needs a bit of tweaking:
- Three to Six Months . Some users are busy in real life Cosmic Emperor (talk) 07:32, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
- Too long a time. If you are so busy in real life, that a simple vote take six months, I propose that you stay out voting. This shouldn't go on for more one or two weeks. Aditya(talk • contribs) 09:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
I agree with Aditya. Generally Talk discussion run for couple of days or so. When there is more major issue in discussion, like move or some policy, it is usually one-two weeks. Even village pump discussions won't go for so long as 3-6 months. If we had to go through such lengthy processes then, Wikipedia would be stale. Anyway, most major active contributors to this article seems to have participated. Previously, I have notified all related projects and all alive editors with 15 edits. If we see there has been not much discussion for for one day or two, we know it is a good time to close. ~ nafSadh did say 02:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- I have changed some of the entries to read modern, instead of renaissance. Because, I have not seen any source referring to Bengal renaissance for events and people that occurred after WWI. 1920s is essentially the outer limit of renaissance, with Bose, Sukumar Ray and a few other tail enders. Enter 1930s and there is an active stand against the renaissance, with painters and poets, but also with a new generation of Muslim participants. So, from there on all is modern. If we want to make space for an ultra-modern or more-recent-than-modern tag, then probably we can do "contemporary"/"recent" or BLP. Aditya(talk • contribs) 05:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Proposal 2
I have a new proposal, which is not very far from the old one, but slightly more realistic in my opinion. Please, comment. Aditya(talk • contribs) 15:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- I never intended the estimates I proposed to be strict but as guidelines. I think regardless, we should go with top 30 straw poll results. For females, I guess you meant 8 (which in nearly quarter of 30). শুভ নববর্ষ ১৪২২Bengali new year | nafSadh did say 15:47, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- The females, my bad, it's 8. What you would find interesting is that the top 30 straw very closely resembles the design i proposed, with a wee bit of variation. Aditya(talk • contribs) 17:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
List of People
Poll
Overview
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
For an overview of votes: click here. (last updated: শুভ নববর্ষ ১৪২২Bengali new year | nafSadh did say 18:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC) (FINAL count) using this script by nafSadh'). Following is a count of votes per user:
Hall of Code messups |
Comments
Add your comments below.
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |||||||||||
Remove this East Bengal , West Bengal ,Bangladesh tags from those who were born before 1930 during British rule
Shakib may be ranked at some point of time , but he is obviously not all time greatest all rounder of the game. If we create a collage for Bengali sportsstars , then we can add Shakib at the top level but not hereCosmic Emperor (talk)
Closing Time-frameI believe that we should specify a date/time when the discussion will be closed. Let's give it a week's time at most and close the discussion on, say, the next Sunday, i.e. 12th April 2015. What do you say guys? Shovon (talk) 10:24, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Looks good. Where to put them? Post on Wikiproject Noticeboards and various userpages? ~ nafSadh did say 20:15, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
PromotionLet's invite every members in Wikiprojects Bangladesh and West Bengal. ~ nafSadh did say 12:20, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Main thread resumed
1. We can use
A person who can write such lines is blocked from editing right now. And I think User:115ash's choice of people is also wrong Cosmic Emperor (talk) 17:13, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Counting policy
But Kautilya3 (talk) you can see that Subhash Bose got less votes than Suchitra Sen as Universal tiger's vote can't be counted as he is new user. If you don't know Bangladeshi icons . You check their Wikipage as I did.Bangaldeshis like Jawed Karim and Irene Khan , Salman Khan were not in this page , I brought them here. Nafsadh and Zayeem inspite of being Bangladeshis are voting without any bias. People like 115ash is the only anti-Indian editor. And I don't want him to cast his votes , even you have considered his argument as worst.i have also voted for Ziaur Rehman. Best thing would be check my choice, zayyem's choice and Nafsadh's choice and then take your own decision to voteCosmic Emperor (talk) 09:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
User:AHLM13 is giving only negative votes to everybody zayeem , new entrant is okayUniversal tiger (talk) 11:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC) What's wrong with me? What do u mean by "negative votes"? User:Universal tiger must be a sockpuppet of somebody. He's vote won't be count. A WP:CHK would be necessary. -- AHLM13 talk 17:58, 3 April 2015 (UTC) WP is not compulsory. people can take a leave and come backCosmic Emperor (talk) 14:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Counting policy 2I definitely have to cut down on my votes. 17 votes too many. Zayeem overshot by 16 votes and universal tiger by 15. Damn. That's bad. Nafsadh, BTW, is bang on 40. I probably would follow his idea of striking out. But, what happens to voters who did not strike out? Random elimination of extra votes? Aditya(talk • contribs) 08:16, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
User:Universal_tiger is confirmed sock; hence removing his votes. nafSadh did say 00:27, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Bias alertLooks like most users are biased. At the point, when we got more participation from West Bengal, we had more toppers from India. Now, with more participation from Bangladesh, we've more toppers from Bangladesh/East Bengal. nafSadh did say 05:54, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Removal of Foreign Bengalis with little or no connection to BengalI have noticed that a good number of the foreigners on this list are ethnically Bengali, but have no connection whatsoever to Bengal. The best example I could think of would be Jawed Karim, he was born in Germany and lives in the US. As for his parents, his mother was not Bengali and father was a Bangladeshi-American. What I'd like to say is that although he is a Bengali by fact, he isn't de facto Bengali. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying we should remove all foreigners from the list. People like Fazlur Rahman Khan and Jhumpa Lahiri both had/have strong connections to Bangladesh and West Bengal and so they should stay there. Others, who are Bengali by blood but aren't actually Bengali in any way should be removed. Rihaz (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Well, in that case let's invite whoever is rooting for him to join this discussion and give their opinions. I'm sure we can reach common ground. Rihaz (Talk to me • What I do) 17:06, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Those who have no picture , those who got zero votes , those who got one vote , those who got two to three votes even after being present in the list from the beginning , those who got one vote/two votes/three votes but more than five negative votes ::::::::::remove them .Bengali origin is enough , whether born and brought up in Bengal ::not necessaryC E (talk) 17:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
শুভ নববর্ষ . But we're in the end of polling, so I'd rather not fork another polling thread. nafSadh did say 05:30, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
List of people to strike outHere goes a list of people who we feel should be striked out (not removed) from the list. If you support him/her being striked out, please place your signature (without time stamp) under the "strike out" column and if not, then do so in the other column. Feel free to add more names. If you have anything to say or would like to discuss anything, do so under the table. Thanks Rihaz (Talk to me • Stuff I do) 05:43, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
|
The results
Final standings
Now that the stipulated time is over we can start releasing the numbers. The top 31 names (the last 3 were tied) are:
Bengal/East Bengal/Bangladesh | West Bengal/India | UK/US | |
---|---|---|---|
Men: Military-Political | |||
Men: Art-entertainment | |||
Men: Social-religious | |||
Men: Science-scholarship | |||
Men: other | |||
Women |
Quota for a balanced representation of time and gender
Women
The first quota I would like to invoke is that of women. Half the people can't represent less than a quarter. That would be 8 women. I can agree to 7. Less than that would be one-in-five. Unacceptable. Posting the count shorrtly. Aditya(talk • contribs) 19:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- There is sizable support for only four females, while one (Arundhaty Roy) does not qualify much as a Bengali. We probably would need to rerun a poll for females with a target for reaching to a consensus of 7-9 females. শুভ নববর্ষ ১৪২২Bengali new year | nafSadh did say 19:36, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Name | Yes | No | Count | Claim to fame | Contemporary? | Location |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Irene Khan | 14 | 1 | 13 | Reformer | Y | BD |
Roquia Sakhawat Hussain | 6 | 0 | 6 | Reformer | N | EB |
Pola Uddin, Baroness Uddin | 4 | 0 | 4 | Baroness | Y | UK |
Arundhati Roy | 6 | 2 | 4 | Author | Y | IN |
Suchitra Sen | 5 | 3 | 2 | Film star | N | WB |
Dola Banerjee | 1 | 0 | 1 | Athlete | Y | WB |
Konnie Huq | 1 | 0 | 1 | TV star | Y | UK |
Pritilata Waddedar | 1 | 0 | 1 | Revolutionary leader | N | EB |
Rani Mukherjee | 1 | 0 | 1 | Film star | Y | IN |
Runa Laila | 2 | 1 | 1 | Singer | Y | BD |
Sharmila Tagore | 2 | 1 | 1 | Film star | N | IN |
Jhumpa Lahiri | 4 | 3 | 1 | Author | Y | US |
Anandamayi Ma | 4 | 4 | 0 | Spiritual leader | N | EB |
On this one I request a policy of selecting on the basis of yes votes. That should get all women with 4 or more yes votes into the collage – Irene, Roquia, Arundhati, Suchitra, Pola, Jhumpa, and Anandamayi. Exactly 7 women. Makes a representation. Aditya(talk • contribs) 19:49, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Anandamayi received overwhelming nays and for Arundhati, we can't strongly claim her as Bengali. শুভ নববর্ষ ১৪২২Bengali new year | nafSadh did say 20:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- We can replace them with the next in line - Runa and Sharmila. Aditya(talk • contribs) 20:30, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- comment Based on the net votes received 1 woman, Irene Khan obtained a clear mandate with another, Roquia Sakhawat Hussain receiving 6 net votes (all ayes). If, as appears to be suggested above, more then these are being considered for inclusion in the collage, can the editors please tell us who they suggest will miss out, noting that the possible 'losers' received more votes? thanks.Coolabahapple (talk) 02:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- That makes it – Irene, Roquia, Runa, Suchitra, Pola, Jhumpa, and Sharmila. Now we need 5 boys to move over and make space for the girls. Aditya(talk • contribs) 03:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Following humble gentlemen moved out to make space for the ladies:
- Zainul Abedin ✓ 8 ✗0
- Jasimuddin ✓10 ✗2
- A. K. Fazlul Huq ✓10 ✗2
- Humayun Ahmed ✓11 ✗3
- Shakib Al Hasan ✓12 ✗5
- Abanindranath Tagore ✓6 ✗0
- Muhammad Shahidullah ✓6 ✗0
—শুভ নববর্ষ ১৪২২Bengali new year | nafSadh did say 04:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Antiquity
The second quota I want to invoke is that of antiquity. We have just 3 valid entries before Bengal Renaissance:
- Aisha (8:0:8)
- Chaitanya Mahaprabhu (7:4:3)
- Raja Ganesha (2:5:-3)
I don't think we can throw away any of them. Aditya(talk • contribs) 20:03, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- I'd like to see all three of them; but Raja Genesha received overwhelmingly more nays than two ayes (one of which is mine). So, there is strong consensus for not including him.
- For Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, we can say there is enough consensus to add. শুভ নববর্ষ ১৪২২Bengali new year | nafSadh did say 20:25, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Okay. If there is no objection, I will take this as consensus. Mahaprabhu and Atisha in. Ganesha out. Aditya(talk • contribs) 20:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Okay. We can post a final thirty list and ask an non-involved admin to close. শুভ নববর্ষ ১৪২২Bengali new year | nafSadh did say 20:42, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Okay. If there is no objection, I will take this as consensus. Mahaprabhu and Atisha in. Ganesha out. Aditya(talk • contribs) 20:32, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Closure
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
We started this discussion to chose 30 people to go in the top collage. We had 31 toppers after the polling ended: we counted using Straw poll and 29-31st positions tied. We found some under representations:
- We have only one from antiquity: Atisha
- We have none from medieval era. We had six candidates from this period: Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, Shashanka, Siraj ud-Daulah, Alaol, Gopala I, Raja Ganesha. Amongst these six, three didn't have a photo and Siraj ud Daulah is decided to be not Bengali. Poll standing for remaining two is:
- Chaitanya Mahaprabhu ✓7 ✗ 4 = 3
- Raja Ganesha ✓2 ✗5 = -3
- Hence, Chaitanya Mahaprabhu can be chosen to represent this era.
- We have only 2 women in top 31, which is gross under-representation. Talk:Bengali_people#Women lists the final standings for women. Only Irene Khan and Begum Rokeya received enough consensus. Following candidates got some support:
- Suchitra Sen ✓5 ✗3 = 2
- Pola Uddin, Baroness Uddin ✓4 ✗0 = 4
- Jhumpa Lahiri ✓4 ✗3 =1
- Runa Laila ✓2 ✗1 = 1
- Sharmila Tagore ✓2 ✗1 = 1
- We can add them in the top thirty.
List
So, the final list of top 30 people to go to the collage:
# | Name | Profession | Era | Region | straw | DOB | WikiMedia | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Amartya Sen | Nobel laureate/Scholar | Contemporary | West Bengal | 18 | 1 | 17 | 1933 | |
2 | Rabindranath Tagore | Nobel laureate/Author | Renaissance | Bengal | 16 | 0 | 16 | 1861 | |
3 | Muhammad Yunus | Nobel laureate/Reformer | Modern | Bangladesh | 15 | 0 | 15 | 1940 | |
4 | Jagadish Chandra Bose | Scientist | Renaissance | Bengal | 15 | 1 | 14 | 1858 | |
5 | Kazi Nazrul Islam | Author | Modern | Bangladesh | 13 | 0 | 13 | 1899 | |
6 | Irene Khan | Reformer | Contemporary | Bangladesh | 14 | 1 | 13 | 1956 | |
7 | Sheikh Mujibur Rahman | Statesman | Modern | Bangladesh | 14 | 1 | 13 | 1920 | |
8 | Ram Mohan Roy | Reformer/Religious leader | Renaissance | West Bengal | 14 | 1 | 13 | 1772 | File:Raja Ram Mohan Roy.jpg |
9 | Salman Khan | Educator | Contemporary | US | 12 | 0 | 12 | 1976 | |
10 | Meghnad Saha | Scientist | Modern | West Bengal | 12 | 0 | 12 | 1893 | |
11 | Ravi Shankar | Musician | Modern | West Bengal | 11 | 0 | 11 | 1920 | |
12 | Bankim Chandra Chattopadhyay | Author | Renaissance | West Bengal | 11 | 0 | 11 | 1838 | |
13 | Satyajit Ray | Film maker | Modern | West Bengal | 12 | 1 | 11 | 1921 | |
14 | Subhas Chandra Bose | Revolutionary leader | Modern | West Bengal | 12 | 1 | 11 | 1897 | , |
15 | Fazle Hasan Abed | Reformer | Contemporary | Bangladesh | 10 | 0 | 10 | 1936 | |
16 | Zainul Abedin |
Painter/Artist | Modern | Bangladesh | 8 | 0 | 8 | 1914 | |
17 | Lalon | Spiritual leader | Renaissance | East Bengal | 11 | 1 | 10 | 1774 | , |
18 | Satyendra Nath Bose | Scientist | Modern | East Bengal | 12 | 2 | 10 | 1894 | |
19 | Jawed Karim | Entrepreneur | Contemporary | US | 9 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | |
20 | Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar | Author/Reformer | Renaissance | West Bengal | 10 | 1 | 9 | 1820 | File:Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar photo.jpg |
21 | A. K. Fazlul Huq |
Policitcal leader | Modern | Bangladesh | 10 | 2 | 8 | 1873 | |
22 | Atisha | Spiritual leader | Ancient | East Bengal | 8 | 0 | 8 | 1000 | |
23 | Brojen Das | Athelete | Modern | Bangladesh | 8 | 0 | 8 | 1927 | |
24 | Begum Rokeya | Reformer | Modern | East Bengal | 6 | 0 | 6 | 1880 | |
25 | Pola Uddin, Baroness Uddin | Baroness | Contemporary | UK | 4 | 0 | 4 | 1959 | |
26 | Chaitanya Mahaprabhu | Spiritual leader | Medieval | Bengal | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1486 | |
27 | Rani Mukherji |
Film star | Modern | West Bengal | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | |
28 | Runa Laila | Singer | Contemporary | Bangladesh | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1950? | File:Runa Laila.jpg |
29 | Sharmila Tagore | Film star | Modern | West Bengal | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1944 | |
30 | Jhumpa Lahiri | Author | Modern | US | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1967 |
Update Due to unavailability of commons compliant images, following faces were replaced:
- Maulana Bhasani ⟨9⟩ ✓12 ✗3 with A. K. Fazlul Huq ⟨8⟩ ✓10 ✗2
- Fazlur Rahman Khan ⟨10⟩ ✓10 ✗0 with Zainul Abedin ⟨8⟩ ✓8 ✗0
- Suchitra Sen with Rani Mukherji
Both replacements form #1 and #2 were candidates co-stood after straw poll at 22-27 with 8 straw polls, and it works out well as both are somewhat from same profession. However, #3 Sen was replaced with next available common compliant face, Mukherji from list of women in the poll. --nafSadh did say 23:34, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Bengal/East Bengal/Bangladesh | West Bengal/India | UK/US | TOTAL | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Military-political |
3 | |||
Art-entertainment |
9 | |||
Social-religious |
10 | |||
Science-scholarship |
5 | |||
Other |
3 | |||
TOTAL | 12 | 15 | 3 | 30 |
Ratification
Polling discussion is in sections above and a overview of survey data is in a spreadsheet. শুভ নববর্ষ ১৪২২Bengali new year | nafSadh did say 03:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Ping: @115ash:, @Aditya Kabir:, @Aftabuzzaman:, @AHLM13:, @Amitrochates:, @Anand2202:, @Anoopkn:, @Arr4: @AsceticRose:, @Calypsomusic:, @Coolabahapple:, @CosmicEmperor:, @Devx101:, @Happiest persoN:, @Kmzayeem:, @Moony22:, @Nafsadh:, @NahidSultan:, @Rihazrihazrihaz:, @Rossi101:, @Royroydeb:, @Samudrakula:, @Sharif uddin:, @Shovon76:, @Tanweer Morshed:, @Vanamonde93:, @Vignesh Mani M:, @Vyom25:, @संजीव कुमार:. — শুভ নববর্ষ ১৪২২Bengali new year | nafSadh did say 03:55, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
Let's ratify the list: **** Add {{agree}} ~~~~ to ratify, after this line. ****
- Agree Aditya(talk • contribs) 04:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Agree nafSadh did say 04:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Agree But the list should be ranked according to History (date of birth).Atisha comes first .CosmicEmperor (talk) 04:28, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that is imperative. I'd venture in creating the collage photo this weekend. nafSadh did say 05:33, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Agree Amitrochates (talk) 07:02, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Agree Arr4 (talk) 06:59, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Agree ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Agree Shovon (talk) 08:45, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- AgreeVignesh Mani M (talk) 20:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- AgreeCoolabahapple (talk) 23:44, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Agree Samudrakula (talk) 13:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
- Agree --Vyom25 (talk) 12:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Disagreement
**** Add {{disagree}} ~~~~ to express your concerns, after this line. ****
Disagree LOL! What is this? It's funny to put those images. There were less than thirty wikipedians to vote and one week was not enough. I can't understand why Salman Khan and Irene Khan obtained so many votes. They don't deserve to be labelled in this article. -- AHLM13 talk 10:26, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes. But the process needs to end. This can not remain open to you guys who are ready to WP:WAR for ever. And WP:CONSENSUS does not mean that everyone is happy. ALL of us can't have our favorites in there and our objections out of the list. May be we can have a subpage to suggest our own versions of the collage, then we ALL can have our demand fulfilled. Aditya(talk • contribs) 15:20, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Disagree Although this is a list of BENGALI PEOPLE, and not GREATEST BENGALIS OF ALL TIME, I still don't like it. It's a shame that people like Ziaur Rahman, Azizul Haque, Muhammad Abdul Bari and Sourav Ganguly have not gained enough votes. Strange that Swami Vivekananda and Rani Mukherjee won't be included here, as they can be labelled even at the Indian one. As soon as the last edit war finished, vandals and sockpuppets began to disturb most of us. Nevertheless, users like NafSadh and Aditya Kabir have put a lot of effort on this issue, and I appreciate this and thank to them. But I believe that this solution is better. We can remove all pictures here and add to Bengali Muslims and Bengali Hindus. --115ash→(☏) 10:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- I was just wondering:
- What happens to Ram Mohan Roy, Rabindranath Tagore, Lalon and Atisha? I don't think they would agree to be on either list.
- How do you disagree to ratify something? Isn't it a bit oxymoronic?
- Just curious. And, I don't think I like the list, or anybody did, because no one would have made this list. The disagreement you have that this and that person should have been there is the exact reason we had this poll. To select not my choice, but our choice. Collective collaboration. Perhaps that's not a difficult idea to grasp with. As I see, looking at the distribution, the collective chose wisely, and much without a collective bias. Aditya(talk • contribs) 15:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Severely, the current collage would be perfect. Otherwise, we go with no images then. --115ash→(☏) 09:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Noted. And completely disagreed. You need to take such a radical decision to a bigger forum like the village pump. Not here. And, NO ONE but you and your team mates agree to the current collage. One request, please do not continue with the edit warring if and when we have a consensus. Aditya(talk • contribs) 11:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Why are you still talking about that Edit warring? It's thousands time better if this article is deleted. --115ash→(☏) 12:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- If I am not entirely wrong, the current collage carries your choice, and you have warred enough to keep it that way. Now, you are saying, if that collage is not kept, the article better be deleted. Isn't this "my way or highway" a bit extreme of a proposal? Aditya(talk • contribs) 16:08, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- P.S. I am talking about edit wars because:
- You and your edit warring were the primary reasons for this poll.
- You have already been engaged in serious edit wars over the collage, including a 3RR.
- You have done the same type of edit war over a similar subject - Asian American collage. You refused to listen to every other editor in that article too.
- I have found a lot of edit war warnings, and a few other unconstructive edit warnings in your talk page - this, this, this, this, this, this, and this. That's a lot of edit warring in 9 months.
- I have a request to make to you - please don't start warring again after we have consensus. Aditya(talk • contribs) 16:58, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Why are you still talking about that Edit warring? It's thousands time better if this article is deleted. --115ash→(☏) 12:56, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Noted. And completely disagreed. You need to take such a radical decision to a bigger forum like the village pump. Not here. And, NO ONE but you and your team mates agree to the current collage. One request, please do not continue with the edit warring if and when we have a consensus. Aditya(talk • contribs) 11:43, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Severely, the current collage would be perfect. Otherwise, we go with no images then. --115ash→(☏) 09:40, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- I was just wondering:
Disagree It is very strange that the list of famous Bengalis does not include Vivekananda. That is like making a list of Gujarati people without including Gandhi. There are other omissions too, but this one is glaringly obvious. Calypsomusic (talk) 12:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- May be Bengal has more than one of Bapu's stature - Chaitanya, Atisha, Ram Mohan, Lalon. None was a politician like Bapu though. Aditya(talk • contribs) 17:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Vivekananda did not get enough support. And your analogy is incorrect. If anything. Rabindranath is most essential member of such list, not really Vivekananda. So, you are denying to ratify, on the basis that one of your dream guy did not make it? None of the people ratified have all their people in. nafSadh did say 17:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Comments
- Comment: I can't completely agree with these names, Sher-e-Bangla A. K. Fazlul Huq must be included in the collage as he had very important role in both Bengal. He had an outstanding political career and did a lot for the people of Bengal. He was rated #4 Greatest Bengalis of All time. That BBC survey had been running for 1 year (2003-2004) and votes were given by millions. I am very surprised how his name can be removed from the list. Dr. Muhammad Shahidullah was one of the greatest linguist Bengalis ever had. He had also an important role in Bengali Language Movement. His dialogue “আমরা হিন্দু বা মুসলমান যেমন সত্য, তার চেয়ে বেশি সত্য আমরা বাঙ্গালি” inspired all walks of Bengalis to be united for the right of Bengali Language. I would suggest to reduce two women's name and add their name. They are more notable than some of the women. Happiest persoN (talk) 08:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- You are upset that Sher-e-Bangla and Dr. M. Shahidullah did not make it to top 23, though made it to top 31. Me too. I am also upset that Shakib, Syed Mujtaba and Humayun Ahmed are not there. Also, there are more people from West than East Bengal. But, we have to understand that this is a photo to represent totality of the Bengali ethnicity; not a mere run for most notables. Women are more than half of the population and they deserve more representation than just 2. nafSadh did say 14:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- "But, we have to understand that this is a photo to represent totality of the Bengali ethnicity; not a mere run for most notables. Women are more than half of the population and they deserve more representation than just 2." - if you agree with this statement and the collage is not to be made up of pictures of the most notables but rather a representation then where are the pictures of Bengali children 25%(see World population), of the population? or the physically disabled 10%(see Disability) of the population? Coolabahapple (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- There are 7 women's name in the list and 5 names wouldn't so bad i think. You are talking about Bengali ethnicity and these duo are born Bengalis (জাত বাঙালি). On the other hand, Sharmila Tagore is a half Bengali, her parents are Assamese and Bengali. In the voting race, she got only 2 votes in favor of her and 1 against her where Mr. Huq got 10 ayes and 2 nays. and Muhammad Shahidullah got 6ayes and 0 nays. Female quota for a collage is little offensive. Why should we put their name if they not eligible enough (by votes)? Happiest persoN (talk) 04:51, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- "But, we have to understand that this is a photo to represent totality of the Bengali ethnicity; not a mere run for most notables. Women are more than half of the population and they deserve more representation than just 2." - if you agree with this statement and the collage is not to be made up of pictures of the most notables but rather a representation then where are the pictures of Bengali children 25%(see World population), of the population? or the physically disabled 10%(see Disability) of the population? Coolabahapple (talk) 16:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- You are upset that Sher-e-Bangla and Dr. M. Shahidullah did not make it to top 23, though made it to top 31. Me too. I am also upset that Shakib, Syed Mujtaba and Humayun Ahmed are not there. Also, there are more people from West than East Bengal. But, we have to understand that this is a photo to represent totality of the Bengali ethnicity; not a mere run for most notables. Women are more than half of the population and they deserve more representation than just 2. nafSadh did say 14:13, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment: Contrary to the discussed quota system above which talked of 2 artists there are now no artists even though Abanindranath Tagore (Author/Arist, Modern, West Bengal) receive 6 ayes and zero nays, a net of 6 - " the first major exponent of swadeshi values in Indian art, thereby founding the influential Bengal school of art, which led to the development of modern Indian painting He was also a noted writer, particularly for children. Popularly known as 'Aban Thakur', his books ... are landmarks in Bengali language children's literature." - from his wikiarticle (also a children's author); while Zainul Abedin (Artist, Modern, Bangladesh) received 8 ayes and zero nays, a net of 8 - unfortunately most of his article has no citations. While the proposed quota had 2 to 4 athletes there is now just one athelete though Saurav Ganguly (Athlete, Contemporary, West Bengal) received 10 ayes and 4 nayes or a net of 6 votes - " He is widely considered to be one of the greatest batsmen of all time. he is the 5th highest run scorer in One Day Internationals (ODIs) and was the 3rd person in history to cross the 10,000 run landmark, after Sachin Tendulkar and Inzamam Ul Haq. In 2002, the Wisden Cricketers' Almanack ranked him the sixth greatest ODI batsman of all time, next to Viv Richards, Sachin Tendulkar, Brian Lara, Dean Jones and Michael Bevan." - from his wikiarticle. The only collector of folklore in the top 30 Jasimuddin, (Author, Bangladesh) received 10 ayes and 2 nays, a net of 8 - "a Muslim Bengali poet, songwriter, prose writer, folklore collector and radio personality. He is commonly known in Bangladesh as Polli Kobi (The Rural Poet), for his faithful rendition of Bengali folklore in his works." - from his wikiarticle. While the hindu Swami Vivekananda (Spiritual leader, Renaissance, West Bengal) received 8 ayes and 2 nays a net of 6 - "He was a key figure in the introduction of the Indian philosophies of Vedanta and Yoga to the Western world and is credited with raising interfaith awareness, bringing Hinduism to the status of a major world religion during the late 19th century." - from his wikiarticle. Sorry, i know that we should be npov but these people are brilliant. Of course, if it is decided that the collage should be more representative and not notables (please see my comment above) then who else are to be left off? Coolabahapple (talk) 17:25, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- I am not saying notability won't matter. I'm saying women are under-represented, while they are still notable. It is hard to justify that these ladies are way more important than those guys who are left out. So the question is, are we willing to see some female representation? Remember that, there are very few female Wikipedians here and I'm afraid there was no participation from any female editors here, which I'm afraid may have induced gender bias in the polling. And just consider, most other ethnicity, with even much richer history, has 24 people in the collage. We are having 30, that is 6 more and let us use that place for ladies. Can we? Shall we? I am a boy, and I like girls :P — nafSadh did say 18:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes. A lot of great Bengalis are not there in the selection for collage. Because there can be only 30 images in the collage, and there are more than 30 great Bengalis. Some did not have free images to use. Some did not get nominated here, for the vote. Some did not get enough votes. Some had a lot of voters objecting. Some did not get enough points to make it to the quota. It is all unfair. But, total fairness is the work of the creator, and not a poor encyclopedia that can not manage more than 30 images in a collage. Aditya(talk • contribs) 03:41, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, so the artists miss out to the singers and filmstars, just like in real life, funny about atheletes/cricketers though,lolCoolabahapple (talk) 17:47, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- ps. i did not receive the "ping" about this but rather this page is on my watchlist so not sure if other "pingees" know of this discussionCoolabahapple (talk) 17:47, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Can you help us by posing on their talk pages? I think there is some settings about notifications for pings (a.k.a. mention you in some place). There is a notification in the top right beside you username in Wikipedia, where you were supposed to see the ping. --nafSadh did say 17:55, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, i have left a message on all the "pingees" talk page except those that have agreed and that have commented. Regarding the ping, thanks, yes i know there is a "your notifications" on top right beside user name (i
regularlyoccasionly receive "thanks" there:))Coolabahapple (talk) 19:34, 18 April 2015 (UTC)- Thanks for doing that :D. I'm not sure why this did happen. Someone should report a bug. I think WikiMedia development team has a feedback system. –nafSadh did say 21:55, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, i have left a message on all the "pingees" talk page except those that have agreed and that have commented. Regarding the ping, thanks, yes i know there is a "your notifications" on top right beside user name (i
- Can you help us by posing on their talk pages? I think there is some settings about notifications for pings (a.k.a. mention you in some place). There is a notification in the top right beside you username in Wikipedia, where you were supposed to see the ping. --nafSadh did say 17:55, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- I am not saying notability won't matter. I'm saying women are under-represented, while they are still notable. It is hard to justify that these ladies are way more important than those guys who are left out. So the question is, are we willing to see some female representation? Remember that, there are very few female Wikipedians here and I'm afraid there was no participation from any female editors here, which I'm afraid may have induced gender bias in the polling. And just consider, most other ethnicity, with even much richer history, has 24 people in the collage. We are having 30, that is 6 more and let us use that place for ladies. Can we? Shall we? I am a boy, and I like girls :P — nafSadh did say 18:51, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
I was re-reading Coolapple's issues, and couldn't help posting a bit of my own mind. While looking at the distribution of the 30 entries, I feel good. But, when I go closer I want to complain – why is there no athlete here? Where are Saurabh, Shakib, Gobar and Dola? Where are the shooters, grand masters and Wasfia, the woman climber of seven summit? Why is there no artist here? Aban, Zainul, Nandalal - where are they? Where are Ramkinkar and Sultan, Novera and Muzharul Islam? And, where are Ramakrishna or his disciple Vivekananda, or Aurobindo? Where are the kings? Or Allauddin Khan, who issued a galaxy of musicians – Ali Akbar, Ravi Shankar, Allarakha, Pannalal – while creating a gharana? For that matter where are Ali Akbar and Pannalal?
I miss Rani Bhabani, the most successful woman revolutionary, and Kedar Rai, the biggest of Bengali bhuyans among baro bhuyans, Jasimuddin and Surya Sen, Khaled Musharraf, the most successful guerilla commander, and Tomy Miah, the king of cooks, the inventor of the thumb print, Kashidash, Uttamkumar, Bidhan Roy, PC Sorcar, and Kishor Kumar? 30 is never enough.
We still have 7 from contemporary times, 15 from modern times, 6 from Bengal renaissance, and 2 from the past. Not ideal, but not bad. The regional distribution is also good. WB: 15 (including 2 marked as Indian, and 1 marked as Bengal), EB: 12 (including 1 from Bengal), diaspora 3 (1 UK/2 US). It is amusing to see that the UK entry is a baroness and the US entries are web entrepreneurs. What is particularly encouraging is the low number of political leaders – 1 statesman, 1 political leader, 1 revolutionary leader. Nice. It is also good that 3 scientists are in, all three with amazing credentials. Aditya(talk • contribs) 02:23, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
- Nice commentary. I missed a lot of people too. BTW, this long discussion has given us enough meat to enrich notable Bengalis section. Right now, that section is crammed list of many people. I am working on a collage to upload. nafSadh did say 06:51, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
[comment removed per WP:TPO]
- Thanks for the commentary and I appreciate it. But I DO NOT LIKE ANYONE USING MY REAL NAME IN WIKIPEDIA TALK PAGES. It is a norm to address Wikipedians by their usernames. I reveal my real name, only because I prefer to avoid anonymity; but that does not mean people should use my real name in talk pages. nafSadh did say 13:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - I do think Happiest Person and Coolabahapple have raised some valid points. Besides, if you cut out the persons selected in the poll, it really discards the very reason behind the poll and would make room for future grudges on this issue. Each of us has missed some of their preferred persons; the best way to deal with it is to strictly go with the original results of the poll. The gender bias, evident in the original list of 31 persons, is really unfortunate, but I don't think we need to remove the selected persons to make room for more women. Perhaps, we could add five more women to the original list of 31 persons which would make it a collage of 36 persons. Zayeem (talk) 05:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- The point that I see in both arguments is that certain people are missing. Is there any other point? We have been discussing quotas from day one. In fact we had a quota system proposed before we had a poll. We had a discussion on it. And NONE of the people, now complaining against a quota system, had any complaints back then.
- The sad thing is - if we create an athelet quota and get Saurabh in there, everyone will be happy. But, if we create a women's quota, most men are upset. Why is that? Aditya(talk • contribs) 07:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Probably because most of them are not man enough. — nafSadh did say 13:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Does anyone know how to request a topic ban? Some extreme POV-pushers might need it soon. Aditya(talk • contribs) 16:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Never did. But, WP:TBAN can be imposed via either WP:ARB/R or WP:CBAN. I think, there could be meat or sock involved. nafSadh did say 17:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Looks like the whole thing is falling apart again and again for one single user. nafSadh did say 17:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- The process need not to fall apart. Since we have enough votes to ratify the list already, let's just put a countdown clock to the ratification process, and close this by end this week. If disruptive edits continue, then there is topic ban. Edit war is enough ground for a topic ban. Keep and eye on the code-names. Both of them. I think I warned about them quite some time back. Aditya(talk • contribs) 02:46, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Looks like the whole thing is falling apart again and again for one single user. nafSadh did say 17:04, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Never did. But, WP:TBAN can be imposed via either WP:ARB/R or WP:CBAN. I think, there could be meat or sock involved. nafSadh did say 17:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Does anyone know how to request a topic ban? Some extreme POV-pushers might need it soon. Aditya(talk • contribs) 16:12, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Probably because most of them are not man enough. — nafSadh did say 13:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- The Collage. I have created a collage Image:Bengali people.jpg, and added it to the article. If the list changes before closure, we can always update the image. – nafSadh did say 00:46, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- One of the lousiest collage. --115ash→(☏) 13:15, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Yes. It was not made by you. Aditya(talk • contribs) 15:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Comment, collage looks good, although why are the ladies mainly down in bottom left corner, would it be better for them to be scattered throughout, or are the pictures in the order they appear for a reason? Coolabahapple (talk) 15:43, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- I think it was done chronologically, by birth date. Aditya(talk • contribs) 15:50, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Most collages I've seen in chronological in order of birth (or something similar). When I instigated the poll, I thought there would enough women and scattered throughout the history. But only in the end while making the collage, it became apparent that they are all from the recent era. It is partly because Bengali women had been underprivileged and still are. You can see, it in this very poll. nafSadh did say 18:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks, now I just need to ratify Coolabahapple (talk) 23:40, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
- Most collages I've seen in chronological in order of birth (or something similar). When I instigated the poll, I thought there would enough women and scattered throughout the history. But only in the end while making the collage, it became apparent that they are all from the recent era. It is partly because Bengali women had been underprivileged and still are. You can see, it in this very poll. nafSadh did say 18:06, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar | ||
well done for everyone involved in the making of the collage, please feel free to copy this to your talk page Coolabahapple (talk) 07:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC) |