Talk:Bauhaus books coffee

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 September 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bauhaus books coffee redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Food and drink: Beverages Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This redirect is within the scope of the Beverages Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

Blogs as references

A user removed some citations because they were published in blogs. I reinserted them. The issue is summarized at WP:BLOGS.

One of the blogs is published by Rose Tosti, a Seattle Weekly journalist. It is a coffee culture review blog. Here is Tosti's work at the Seattle Weekly. I think that the blog meets reliability requirements to critique the aesthetic of the coffeehouse since it is authored by a named person in the field of reviewing Seattle-area businesses and events.

Alex Garcia is a Seattle-area businessperson who also self-identifies on his blog and likewise is putting his community reputation at stake by publishing quality reviews.

I would like to assert that the material cited is not being questioned and that the authors have standing to give opinions on the matters being cited, and for those reasons, the citations should remain in place. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If Tosti is published in the field, that meets requirements. Alex Garcia is not. There's only one exception to the rule against self-published sources, and that is that the source is a published expert in the field. Published elsewhere by a third party. If you have some examples of published work by Garcia, I'll reconsider. Yworo (talk) 02:48, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Garcia himself is a publisher and in the business of promoting companies - see here for example. The review he wrote about Bauhaus is on his personal website, and I presume he reviewed it just because he likes reviewing things and not because they paid him. Is this sufficient? I think I can pull more on him. Blue Rasberry (talk) 05:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The link you provided is to an article about Garcia. What you need to show is that he has written articles on related topics which have been published by reliable third-party publishers. A book, a journal or magazine article, a newspaper column. If all of Garcia's reviews are self-published, then we cannot use him as a source. The specific exception is worded thusly at WP:SPS: "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable third-party publications." (emphasis added). Having published work in a relevant field is what makes someone an "established expert"; without it, regardless of their other qualifications, their blog is just like mine or yours, not a reliable source. In any case, it appears that his expertise is in promotion and marketing, not in writing neutral journalism or reviews. Of course, the linked article about Garcia could be used as a source for an article about him or his company, if there are other substantive sources to work from. Yworo (talk) 16:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to think about this. Blue Rasberry (talk) 21:28, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]