1 Million March 4 Children was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 September 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Anti-gender movement. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ studiesLGBTQ studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
A fact from Anti-gender movement appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 September 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Darakchi, Shaban (2019). "'The Western Feminists Want to Make Us Gay': Nationalism, Heteronormativity, and Violence Against Women in Bulgaria in Times of 'Anti-gender Campaigns'". Sexuality & Culture. 23 (4): 1208–1229. doi:10.1007/s12119-019-09611-9. S2CID164787646.
Dietze, Gabriele (2015). "Anti-Genderismus intersektional lesen". Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft (in German and English). 13: Überwachung und Kontrolle 7 (2): 125–127. doi:10.25969/mediarep/1625.
Ďurinová, Petra; Malová, Darina (2017). "Gender issues in Kotleba's People's Party of Our Slovakia: An attempt at a thematic analysis". Human Affairs. 27 (1): 59–74. doi:10.1515/humaff-2017-0006. S2CID152055863.
Fillod, Odile (2014). "L'invention de la 'théorie du genre': le mariage blanc du Vatican et de la science". Contemporary French Civilization (in French). 39 (3): 321–333. doi:10.3828/cfc.2014.19.
Gaweda, Barbara (2017). "The Recent Uprising against Gender Equality. Exploring the discursive construction of the "war on genderism" in Poland". Comunicazione Politica (2): 251–268. doi:10.3270/87223.
Harsin, Jayson (30 November 2017). "Tactical Connecting and (Im-)Mobilizing in the French Boycott School Day Campaign and Anti-Gender Theory Movement". Global Cultures of Contestation: Mobility, Sustainability, Aesthetics & Connectivity. Springer International Publishing. pp. 193–214. ISBN978-3-319-63982-6.
Keil, André (2020). "'We need to rediscover our manliness…': The language of gender and authenticity in German right-wing populism". Journal of Language and Politics. 19 (1): 107–124. doi:10.1075/jlp.19091.kei. S2CID212858517.
Korolczuk, Elżbieta (2020). "Counteracting Challenges to Gender Equality in the Era of Anti-Gender Campaigns: Competing Gender Knowledges and Affective Solidarity". Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society. 27 (4): 694–717. doi:10.1093/sp/jxaa021.
Kuhar, Roman; Pajnic, Mojca (2020). "Populist Mobilizations in Re-Traditionalized Society: Anti-Gender Campaigning in Slovenia". In Dietze, Gabriele; Roth, Julia (eds.). Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European Perspectives and Beyond. transcript Verlag. ISBN978-3-8394-4980-6.
Lavizzari, Anna; Prearo, Massimo (2019). "The anti-gender movement in Italy: Catholic participation between electoral and protest politics". European Societies. 21 (3): 422–442. doi:10.1080/14616696.2018.1536801. S2CID149699658.
Martinsson, Lena (2020). "When gender studies becomes a threatening religion". European Journal of Women's Studies. 27 (3): 293–300. doi:10.1177/1350506820931045. S2CID221097446.
Mayer, Stefanie; Ajanović, Edna (2020). "Man, Woman, Family. Gender and the Limited Modernization of Right-Wing Extremism in Austria". In Sauer, Birgit; Roth, Julia (eds.). Right-Wing Populism and Gender: European Perspectives and Beyond. transcript Verlag. ISBN978-3-8394-4980-6.
Morán Faúndes, José Manuel (2019). "The geopolitics of moral panic: The influence of Argentinian neo-conservatism in the genesis of the discourse of 'gender ideology'". International Sociology. 34 (4): 402–417. doi:10.1177/0268580919856488. S2CID198756100.
Reference ideas for Anti-gender movement
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
O’Sullivan, Míla; Krulišová, Kateřina (2020). "'This agenda will never be politically popular': Central Europe's anti-gender mobilization and the Czech Women, Peace and Security agenda". International Feminist Journal of Politics. 22 (4): 526–549. doi:10.1080/14616742.2020.1796519. S2CID222003458.
Prüller-Jagenteufel, Gunter; Bong, Sharon; Perintfalvi, Rita, eds. (2019). Towards Just Gender Relations: Rethinking the Role of Women in Church and Society. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. ISBN978-3-8470-0985-6.
Robcis, Camille (2015). "Catholics, the 'Theory of Gender,' and the Turn to the Human in France: A New Dreyfus Affair?". The Journal of Modern History. 87 (4): 892–923. doi:10.1086/683599. S2CID147228133.
Winkel, Heidemarie (2018). "Global Historical Sociology and Connected Gender Sociologies: On the Re-Nationalization and Coloniality of Gender". InterDisciplines. Journal of History and Sociology. 9 (2). doi:10.4119/indi-1073.
Your proposed change of gender-critical feminism (the article's actual title) to "radical critiques of transgender rights within certain feminist discourses" is not "established," has no consensus, is very badly worded and was literally added days ago with the misleading edit summary 'Minor changes," and is only pushed by you. --Tataral (talk) 15:48, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's not the only thing you changed in the lead - you've added undue weight to the far right connection. and regardless you need to respect WP:BRD and discuss after you've been reverted. The lead has stood like that for three weeks with a number of subsequent edits.Golikom (talk) 15:50, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is exceedingly well supported by the content of the article and there is nothing undue about it, and it is the established version, having been in the article for ages, in fact years,[1] and was only removed recently with a blatantly false, deceptive edit summary. You need to bring your proposal to change that up on talk instead of edit warring. --Tataral (talk) 15:56, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The link to gender-critical feminism should indeed be shown as "gender-critical feminism" rather than the obfuscatory phrase "radical critiques of transgender rights within certain feminist discourses" which the average reader will find confusing.
Let's look at the longer phrase and see why it is so bad. First up, I'm not saying that it was designed to confuse but it is both over-long and unhelpfully vague which renders it confusing. The fact it says we are "certain" what we are referring to but doesn't actually say what that is is just withholding known information from the reader. Also the word radical is misplaced. "Radical Feminism" is the name of a movement but this does not speak of Radical Feminism it speaks of "radical critiques" and who is to say that these particular "critiques" are actually radical? The whole thing seems deeply conservative to me and notable people have said the same. This gets us into a big mess of argument that we just don't need to have if we stick to the original wording.
Now, I'm not a fan of the gender-critical feminism article having that title either. The Gender Critical movement has some of its roots in Radical Feminism but is now a completely separate thing with a mix of feminists, open anti-feminists and people entirely indifferent to feminism among its ranks. Even so, I am not going to argue against the link showing the title of the article because blind links are confusing, unhelpful to our readers and because this is not the right place to argue about the title of a completely different article. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:33, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. I neglected to mention that bit as it is so obvious. We are not censoring "far-right" from the lead. If it is in the body it goes in the lead. The other link, to far-right populism overlaps somewhat but does not make it redundant. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:39, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm looking at the first few sentences and I think there are some more problems than just those in the above section. After trying to make sense of the edit history for a bit, I can't be bothered to work out who first added what. Let's not make this personal anyway. Let's just look at what I think is badly worded right now and see if we can improve it. (Note: I'm using this pretty randomly chosen version as my point of comparison. It is from about three months ago.)
The anti-gender movement is a global phenomenon - "global phenomenon" can be read as promotional (although I'm sure that wasn't intentional). Also "phenomenon" is a very vague term and we should try to be specific whenever we can. The older version says The anti-gender movement is an international movement and I'd definitely favour a return to that. If that sounds too organised then maybe adding "loosely organised" or "informal" would help.
that opposes concepts often referred to as - "concepts" implies that this is an intellectual disagreement rather than an opposition to people's human rights. Older versions used opposes what it refers to as. The old version seems better as it doesn't define these as concepts and it puts the terminology choice on the movement not on the world in general. Of course, that means that the reader has to read further to understand what is actually going on but that is better than to risk giving a misleading impression from the outset.
commonly used by the movement to critique a range of issues - I don't like the use of "critique". It is not in the body at all and it seems to make this sound like a civilised academic disagreement rather than an anti human rights movement. I am not sure if there is a better word or whether it would be better to go back to an older wording that omitted it and just let "opposes" do all the lifting. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:33, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It got fully protected due to a stupid edit war. It's only for a week. If you have valid citations for any uncited content then please drop them here, either as an edit request or just as a list to be added later. --DanielRigal (talk) 16:39, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
