User contributions for NothingWorthy

3 February 2009

• 04:0804:08, 3 February 2009 diff hist −185 User talk:NothingWorthy Reverted. I think you started it (You can't just ignore something to make it go away). Why did not you copy the last messages to your talk page.
• 00:0900:09, 3 February 2009 diff hist −1 User talk:NothingWorthy One obseravation on your demagogic stunt today. XOM article still unchanged, after wasting all this time.
• 00:0700:07, 3 February 2009 diff hist 1 User talk:NothingWorthy Now demagouge, do you want to continue learning that there is no difference or not, you seem to have alot of time.
• 00:0300:03, 3 February 2009 diff hist −1 User talk:NothingWorthy Now, copy the last "ExxonMobil Reverts" messages on your talk page if you wish to continue this argument to learn that there is no difference between profit & profitability.
• 00:0300:03, 3 February 2009 diff hist 1 User talk:NothingWorthy Now, copy the lase"ExxonMobil Reverts" messages on your talk page if you wish to continue this argument to learn that there is no difference between profit & profitability.

2 February 2009

• 23:5923:59, 2 February 2009 diff hist −7,997 User talk:NothingWorthy Now, as this is a result of your stunt. write that on your talk page.
• 23:5623:56, 2 February 2009 diff hist 339 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 23:5123:51, 2 February 2009 diff hist 458 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 23:4723:47, 2 February 2009 diff hist 162 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 23:1823:18, 2 February 2009 diff hist 106 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 23:1823:18, 2 February 2009 diff hist −72 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 23:1723:17, 2 February 2009 diff hist 190 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 23:0923:09, 2 February 2009 diff hist 105 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 23:0923:09, 2 February 2009 diff hist 283 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 22:5422:54, 2 February 2009 diff hist 11 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 22:4722:47, 2 February 2009 diff hist 92 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 22:4522:45, 2 February 2009 diff hist 408 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 22:3222:32, 2 February 2009 diff hist 149 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 22:2822:28, 2 February 2009 diff hist −2,043 User talk:NothingWorthy This is my talk page, not yours.
• 22:2622:26, 2 February 2009 diff hist −2,043 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 22:0922:09, 2 February 2009 diff hist 131 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 21:4721:47, 2 February 2009 diff hist 105 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 21:4621:46, 2 February 2009 diff hist 230 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 21:3421:34, 2 February 2009 diff hist 589 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 21:2521:25, 2 February 2009 diff hist −26 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 21:2021:20, 2 February 2009 diff hist 485 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 21:0621:06, 2 February 2009 diff hist 0 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 21:0321:03, 2 February 2009 diff hist 200 User talk:NothingWorthy No edit summary
• 20:3020:30, 2 February 2009 diff hist −7 ExxonMobil STOP wasting time. Have you READ any of the links??
• 20:2220:22, 2 February 2009 diff hist −19 ExxonMobil TAKE A LOOK at this Fortune Magazine list, http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2007/fortune/0707/gallery.global500_profits.fortune/index.html
• 20:1920:19, 2 February 2009 diff hist 0 ExxonMobil And this, http://royaldutchshellplc.com/2008/01/03/999todaycom-the-worlds-most-profitable-firms/
• 20:1820:18, 2 February 2009 diff hist 12 ExxonMobil Reverted last edit. You are the one who has to stop reverting. OPEN any of the links.
• 20:1420:14, 2 February 2009 diff hist 19 ExxonMobil And this, http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/exxon_mobile_most_profitable_company_in_the_world/
• 20:1120:11, 2 February 2009 diff hist −7 ExxonMobil Reverted last edit. Well, what about this?, http://www.finance-weblog.com/50226711/exxon_mobil_most_profitable_year_for_any_company_is_us_history.php
• 18:2218:22, 2 February 2009 diff hist 14 User talk:WillOakland No edit summary
• 18:1518:15, 2 February 2009 diff hist −179 User talk:WillOakland No edit summary
• 17:5917:59, 2 February 2009 diff hist 470 User talk:WillOakland →ExxonMobil: new section
• 17:4917:49, 2 February 2009 diff hist −361 User talk:NothingWorthy Write that on your talk page.
• 17:4217:42, 2 February 2009 diff hist −7 ExxonMobil STOP wasting time. Look at the ranking, http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0806/gallery.G500_biggest_profits.fortune
• 17:0517:05, 2 February 2009 diff hist −7 ExxonMobil Reverted last edit. I don't think this is ambiguous, http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0806/gallery.G500_biggest_profits.fortune
• 07:2907:29, 2 February 2009 diff hist −7 ExxonMobil Reverted last edit. Take this way, http://money.cnn.com/galleries/2008/fortune/0806/gallery.G500_biggest_profits.fortune

1 February 2009

• 03:0303:03, 1 February 2009 diff hist −3 ExxonMobil Reverted last edit. XOM is the world's most profitable publicly traded company.

31 January 2009

• 07:3307:33, 31 January 2009 diff hist 5 ExxonMobil No edit summary

30 January 2009

• 15:3515:35, 30 January 2009 diff hist 18 ExxonMobil No edit summary
• 15:0515:05, 30 January 2009 diff hist 715 ExxonMobil No edit summary
• 14:1614:16, 30 January 2009 diff hist 115 ExxonMobil No edit summary

23 January 2009

• 02:3802:38, 23 January 2009 diff hist −3 Google No edit summary
• 01:5201:52, 23 January 2009 diff hist −29 Google No edit summary
• 01:0601:06, 23 January 2009 diff hist −27 Standard Oil No edit summary
• 01:0301:03, 23 January 2009 diff hist −44 John D. Rockefeller Undid revision 265789495 by 24.158.149.184 (talk)